ADVERTISEMENT

Live feed

Forum list Trending threads

Live feed

 Posts

Shot Clock

TadQueasy
MoSooner69 said:
So is this a way to get it in when the majority do not want it? Hope it sticks to those few tournaments but not sure it will.
Click to expand...
No way it stays with only a few tournaments. This is definitely the way they get this done with Admin being against it. Coaches as a whole want it. No matter what the response is over the next couple years the state will say it has been well received and push on to do what they want. The state is going to do what the state wants and the writing as been on the wall for awhile on this.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: Rshs1991

How did the Big 4 in Joplins jamboree look?

cru66
I2R I said:
Everyone wants to hate on Joplin, but IMO I thought they looked fine. It is always difficult to tell because coaches are simply keeping it vanilla and getting kids on tape to finalize the preseason depth chart. O line has good size but may be a bit soft. QB has a good arm but was a little off target on some throws. The TE and WRs looked good. Defense gave up some plays to Seneca but still respectable overall. I’ll predict a 3rd place finish in the COC with a ceiling of 2nd and floor of 4th.

WC looked small and slow I think they look terrible in the jamboree every year but by years end, I’m sure they’ll be coached up. Floor 5th and ceiling 3rd.

Seneca looked good. Probably the best of the 4 teams if Class size is considered.

Lamar only had a little over 50 kids suited up. Also not very big size wise. I thought their play was comparable to WC but considering they’re class 2 and not 5, they’ll be just fine.
Click to expand...

Thx for the info. After what joplin lost 3rd place would be good finish. WC usually finishes strong. Looking forward to some football finally.
Click to expand...

How did the Big 4 in Joplins jamboree look?

I2R I
cru66 said:
Asking for a friend.
Click to expand...
Everyone wants to hate on Joplin, but IMO I thought they looked fine. It is always difficult to tell because coaches are simply keeping it vanilla and getting kids on tape to finalize the preseason depth chart. O line has good size but may be a bit soft. QB has a good arm but was a little off target on some throws. The TE and WRs looked good. Defense gave up some plays to Seneca but still respectable overall. I’ll predict a 3rd place finish in the COC with a ceiling of 2nd and floor of 4th.

WC looked small and slow I think they look terrible in the jamboree every year but by years end, I’m sure they’ll be coached up. Floor 5th and ceiling 3rd.

Seneca looked good. Probably the best of the 4 teams if Class size is considered.

Lamar only had a little over 50 kids suited up. Also not very big size wise. I thought their play was comparable to WC but considering they’re class 2 and not 5, they’ll be just fine.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: sw5890 and Arcola

Midland Empire Conference

W
thetophat2021 said:
Just read this! St. Pius X looks and coach sounds every bit the part. I don't like them in the opener (won't be in Pick Em) but gotta be favored in all the other games except the annual toughie vs. St. James Academy but THIS could be the year they get that one!

Savannah also reads well. Looks overall like another "no middle class" league unless that team is Chillicothe.
Click to expand...
Seen Chilli at Moberly tonight. Good size and RB has good speed. Prolly correct on the middle class of the conference. Looked good against Boonville and not so good against Centralia in Jamboree.
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: thetophat2021
Load more
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back