ADVERTISEMENT

Public & Private

Failures... like Coaching a team that was the last seed in districts. Then, instead of teaching kids a valuable lesson in perseverance, you want to forfeit the game. Then, admin does the right thing and makes you play anyway, and you cry about it . Failures like that?
jim-carrey.gif
No, failure in the classic sense- not winning football games. And excuse making in the classic sense- looking for someone else or something out of your own control as to why you repeatedly achieve failure.
 
What other advantages do you have other than no boundaries? Is the academy and behavioral standards. No transportation system? Let’s not forget those feeder programs strongly supported by community and typically run by the HS head coach.
Boundaries are huge, even cross state lines, can limit enrollment, no special needs, can limit problem kids-if they want, basically can hand pick their student body in terms of total numbers and individual they want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bullitpdq68
Boundaries are huge, even cross state lines, can limit enrollment, no special needs, can limit problem kids-if they want, basically can hand pick their student body in terms of total numbers and individual they want.
47a36e69-a881-4fc1-ab07-e2e4a43562ba_text.gif
 
No special needs program that has to be offered. Class 2 and 3 schools probably have 60-100 kids on IEPs that will never play a sport, not saying a kid on an IEP can't play just unlikely in most cases. Take them away from their enrollment and a lot would drop a Class.
That's a very interesting take, and I agree that is something many do not think about.
 
A Class 2 school with 100 students on an IEP?
It's says something when you have to exaggerate to make your point......
Ah the classic twisting of the words. I said 60-100 and Class 2 and 3. I taught at a class 3 school with 6 SPED teachers that had 14-17 students on their case load.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bullitpdq68
What private schools do not offer a Special Services program?

Not sure if the link works or not, not real tech savvy. But Helias did not offer until around 2018 if I remember correctly.
 
Ah the classic twisting of the words. I said 60-100 and Class 2 and 3. I taught at a class 3 school with 6 SPED teachers that had 14-17 students on their case load.
"Class 2 and 3 schools probably have 60-100 kids on IEPs..."
Those were your exact words. I didn't twist them. Didn't need to. You were exaggerating to make your point.
 

Not sure if the link works or not, not real tech savvy. But Helias did not offer until around 2018 if I remember correctly.
That article does nothing to show that they do not have a special services program. Any other examples of private schools that do not offer a Special Services program?
 
"Class 2 and 3 schools probably have 60-100 kids on IEPs..."
Those were your exact words. I didn't twist them. Didn't need to. You were exaggerating to make your point.
"A Class 2 school with 100 students on an IEP" were your words. I never said specifically that a class 2 school had 100 students on an IEP. I just told you a class 3 school that did. I taught there...as a SPED teacher.
 
That article does nothing to show that they do not have a special services program. Any other examples of private schools that do not offer a Special Services program?
Reading comprehension must not be your strongest asset. I just said Helias has a special ed program but it didn't start until around 2018. The article was to show how privates can not allow a student back with special needs if they choose not to. That can't happen at a public school. Twist it how you want but it's a fact.
 
A Class 2 school with 100 students on an IEP?
It's says something when you have to exaggerate to make your point......
I never said 100 students, but point in fact that it is a reality. Some private schools do offer special services, but is more of a recent trend. But, it is a factor that many do not think about.
 
Reading comprehension must not be your strongest asset. I just said Helias has a special ed program but it didn't start until around 2018. The article was to show how privates can not allow a student back with special needs if they choose not to. That can't happen at a public school. Twist it how you want but it's a fact.
I read fine. I can see why you would want to move onto personal insults, though. If my argument was as flimsy and questionable as yours, I would consider the same. My question was "What private schools do not offer a special services program?" And you answered with a link to an article about a private school that does, in fact, offer a special services program.
 
Last edited:
I read fine. I can see why you would want to move onto personal insults, though. If my argument was as flimsy and questionable as yours, I would consider the same. My question was "What private schools do not offer a special services program?" And you answered with a link to an article about a private school that does offer a special services program.

Here's a link to the number of students with special services by each district. And again, you can read it how you want to. I live in mid-mo, I would be shocked if Helias has 10 kids on an IEP. They didn't offer special services until around 18, like I already acknowledged. So up until then they had 0 students on an IEP. Going by their school directory Lutheran North has 1 Special services teacher...how many students do you think they're serving? 10-15 tops? Cardinal Ritter has 2 Learning Support Teachers. Not sure if they offer IEP or 504 Plans. Take a school with similar size, Lafayette County, and they have 5 SPED Teachers. Take those students away from LC and they're Class 1. Lamar would be similar.

You can argue all you want, but the fact is Privates don't HAVE to offer Special Services and if they do offer them they have a substantially less amount of students that have them.
 

Here's a link to the number of students with special services by each district. And again, you can read it how you want to. I live in mid-mo, I would be shocked if Helias has 10 kids on an IEP. They didn't offer special services until around 18, like I already acknowledged. So up until then they had 0 students on an IEP. Going by their school directory Lutheran North has 1 Special services teacher...how many students do you think they're serving? 10-15 tops? Cardinal Ritter has 2 Learning Support Teachers. Not sure if they offer IEP or 504 Plans. Take a school with similar size, Lafayette County, and they have 5 SPED Teachers. Take those students away from LC and they're Class 1. Lamar would be similar.

You can argue all you want, but the fact is Privates don't HAVE to offer Special Services and if they do offer them they have a substantially less amount of students that have them.
I'm not arguing anything. Just trying to get you to back up your contention that some private schools do not offer special services. You've yet to do that, as I expected.
 
I'm not arguing anything. Just trying to get you to back up your contention that some private schools do not offer special services. You've yet to do that, as I expected.
My original response was they don't HAVE to offer them. I'm almost certain MICDS does not offer special services. I believe Jomjam said he had a son attend. I'd love his input.
 
They do not HAVE to offer, but they cant refuse admission, solely, on the bases of their physical or intellectual disability. (they have to find another reason)
 
I received some smoke signals from someone... we'll call them option3temporary...

I'll summarize his thoughts.
Simple fix: You are classified by the district population you pull from. Fixed.
and the playoff seeding thing can be fixed by using a sagarin-like number instead of just rewarding people for playing clinton (I disagree Clinton won 2 games) and springfield central
 
No special needs program that has to be offered. Class 2 and 3 schools probably have 60-100 kids on IEPs that will never play a sport, not saying a kid on an IEP can't play just unlikely in most cases. Take them away from their enrollment and a lot would drop a Class.

Boundaries are huge, even cross state lines, can limit enrollment, no special needs, can limit problem kids-if they want, basically can hand pick their student body in terms of total numbers and individual they want.
Those are huge advantages.... and really no oversite either.
 
Without a doubt Armymike you have at the least shown those who are paying attention that you are a bigot willing to weaponize Race as a Shield and a Bludgeon to personally degrade another person without Cause or justification.

It is rather disturbing from a mental health perspective that I can say from a professional standpoint. Trying to characterize another person as Racist without cause, proof or justification denotes a rather cruel and crude personality disorder.

You have done this on several instances to various posters not only does it reflect on the weakness of your personality it also seems to be your go to crutch when you fail in the arena of cerebral debates and discussion. Which is often I might add. Sorry you know it and I know it you don't cut muster on in even the most mundane debates. Now call my arrogant and Narcissistic to your Hearts desire it won't change what you know.

I of course figure you will try to deflect my analysis by saying you where just using humor or joking.... or maybe you will even double down and entrench yourself in the belief that Everyone you disagree with is Racist and hunker down with that mindset and try propagating that idea across this form.

Either way it really doesn't manner because you have Clearly by your own hand exposed your true personality and it's rather concerning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J. Kane
Without a doubt Armymike you have at the least shown those who are paying attention that you are a bigot willing to weaponize Race as a Shield and a Bludgeon to personally degrade another person without Cause or justification.

It is rather disturbing from a mental health perspective that I can say from a professional standpoint. Trying to characterize another person as Racist without cause, proof or justification denotes a rather cruel and crude personality disorder.

You have done this on several instances to various posters not only does it reflect on the weakness of your personality it also seems to be your go to crutch when you fail in the arena of cerebral debates and discussion. Which is often I might add. Sorry you know it and I know it you don't cut muster on in even the most mundane debates. Now call my arrogant and Narcissistic to your Hearts desire it won't change what you know.

I of course figure you will try to deflect my analysis by saying you where just using humor or joking.... or maybe you will even double down and entrench yourself in the belief that Everyone you disagree with is Racist and hunker down with that mindset and try propagating that idea across this form.

Either way it really doesn't manner because you have Clearly by your own hand exposed your true personality and it's rather concerning.

Not gonna deflect but you try way to hard to minimize other people.
 
Again I will break apart and chastise a persons view point...... I don't minimize people or attack them at a personal level.

Tearing away at the idea's or view points on Subjects Like Private/Public and Playoff systems structure's is not a Personal attack.

The idea's might be flawed and not well thought out and if that Counter Debate is put forth and the weakness is exposed that is not in anyway Minimizing or attacking that person.

But Calling Someone a Racist without Cause or Evidence is Labeling to Gain Power. It's actually one of the Classic definition of using Statements to Minimize and Pigeon hole someone. You did this nobody else was involved.

Calling someone or even trying to infer people or groups of people are Racist or that the crux of their idea's come from a Racist perspective is not something that is trivial.

Invoking the Klan on a Public Forum is real serious stuff and pointing that finger at a Poster who has not displayed on shred of Racist intent is a very very disgraceful thing to do IMO. If you have a clear conscious on the Subject matter then so be it.

While I think that the whole Words have power schtick is way over blown..... I always feel that caution should be used on throwing the term Racist around willy nilly. In this day and age Nobody is going tolerate Racist or Racial discrimination which is a Great Stride. Throwing innocent person into that disgusting minority group can do harm that cannot be repaired.
 
Again I will break apart and chastise a persons view point...... I don't minimize people or attack them at a personal level.

Tearing away at the idea's or view points on Subjects Like Private/Public and Playoff systems structure's is not a Personal attack.

The idea's might be flawed and not well thought out and if that Counter Debate is put forth and the weakness is exposed that is not in anyway Minimizing or attacking that person.

But Calling Someone a Racist without Cause or Evidence is Labeling to Gain Power. It's actually one of the Classic definition of using Statements to Minimize and Pigeon hole someone. You did this nobody else was involved.

Calling someone or even trying to infer people or groups of people are Racist or that the crux of their idea's come from a Racist perspective is not something that is trivial.

Invoking the Klan on a Public Forum is real serious stuff and pointing that finger at a Poster who has not displayed on shred of Racist intent is a very very disgraceful thing to do IMO. If you have a clear conscious on the Subject matter then so be it.

While I think that the whole Words have power schtick is way over blown..... I always feel that caution should be used on throwing the term Racist around willy nilly. In this day and age Nobody is going tolerate Racist or Racial discrimination which is a Great Stride. Throwing innocent person into that disgusting minority group can do harm that cannot be repaired.

I simply pointed out potential racism established by a pattern of behavior and actions. How it was taken after that says more about others than it does me.
 
Can you give specific details of racism exhibited on this Board and copy and paste? If you do have evidence then you must deem if it’s your civic duty to report this to mosports if you believe that action is necessary so proper action can be taken.

I have read nothing at all from any poster on here that even minimally touches racism outside of you declaring and labeling whole areas and the others in those areas as racist. That is an overt and actual action without context. I view your opinion as misguided and reporting you would do little to change your actual issues. I feel it’s enough for you to expose yourself.

Clearly the burden of evidence is upon you. And I’m not sure what potential racism is? Or what patterns of behavior you have witnessed to come to those conclusion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 503_Maple
Can you give specific details of racism exhibited on this Board and copy and paste? If you do have evidence then you must deem if it’s your civic duty to report this to mosports if you believe that action is necessary so proper action can be taken.

I have read nothing at all from any poster on here that even minimally touches racism outside of you declaring and labeling whole areas and the others in those areas as racist. That is an overt and actual action without context. I view your opinion as misguided and reporting you would do little to change your actual issues. I feel it’s enough for you to expose yourself.

Clearly the burden of evidence is upon you. And I’m not sure what potential racism is? Or what patterns of behavior you have witnessed to come to those conclusion.
I think if anyone’s actions are closer to being racist? It’s absolutely Mike’s comments the past few weeks. He’s the racist here. He’s projecting a lot of hate onto others.
 
I think if anyone’s actions are closer to being racist? It’s absolutely Mike’s comments the past few weeks. He’s the racist here. He’s projecting a lot of hate onto others.

Maybe you need to look up the definition of racism.
 
Can you give specific details of racism exhibited on this Board and copy and paste? If you do have evidence then you must deem if it’s your civic duty to report this to mosports if you believe that action is necessary so proper action can be taken.

I have read nothing at all from any poster on here that even minimally touches racism outside of you declaring and labeling whole areas and the others in those areas as racist. That is an overt and actual action without context. I view your opinion as misguided and reporting you would do little to change your actual issues. I feel it’s enough for you to expose yourself.

Clearly the burden of evidence is upon you. And I’m not sure what potential racism is? Or what patterns of behavior you have witnessed to come to those conclusion.

Look I’m not going through all the posts about St Mary’s, Lutheran North and, even more recently, Center.

And let’s not pretend like I’m the only one that has pointed it out. The worst part is, the reaction is always the same and makes the board look more racist.

For example what is something consistently said about football teams made up of our black brothers and sisters?
Athletic but poorly coached and undisciplined. I’ve seen it on here so many times it can’t be counted. Even in the last few weeks it was said about St Mary’s and CBC until a few of the more mellow posters stating that wasn’t the case. I’m sure you’ll type out an essay denying it though.

Anyway keep calling me racist. I find it hilarious giving I belong to the only ethic group that has to get a federal ID. It’s whatever though 🤪
 
Look I’m not going through all the posts about St Mary’s, Lutheran North and, even more recently, Center.

And let’s not pretend like I’m the only one that has pointed it out. The worst part is, the reaction is always the same and makes the board look more racist.

For example what is something consistently said about football teams made up of our black brothers and sisters?
Athletic but poorly coached and undisciplined. I’ve seen it on here so many times it can’t be counted. Even in the last few weeks it was said about St Mary’s and CBC until a few of the more mellow posters stating that wasn’t the case. I’m sure you’ll type out an essay denying it though.

Anyway keep calling me racist. I find it hilarious giving I belong to the only ethic group that has to get a federal ID. It’s whatever though 🤪
giphy.gif
 
Look I’m not going through all the posts about St Mary’s, Lutheran North and, even more recently, Center.

And let’s not pretend like I’m the only one that has pointed it out. The worst part is, the reaction is always the same and makes the board look more racist.

For example what is something consistently said about football teams made up of our black brothers and sisters?
Athletic but poorly coached and undisciplined. I’ve seen it on here so many times it can’t be counted. Even in the last few weeks it was said about St Mary’s and CBC until a few of the more mellow posters stating that wasn’t the case. I’m sure you’ll type out an essay denying it though.

Anyway keep calling me racist. I find it hilarious giving I belong to the only ethic group that has to get a federal ID. It’s whatever though 🤪

AND...you are a holocaust DENIER too.
 
It's also a possibility that you or I win the Powerball drawing this weekend. I've got a gambler in the family that says so.
I think your odds would be better than you think. I have 3 kids on IEP out of 5 that is over 50%.

I have one in Private school and they don't offer IEP not even sure they know what that is? But they seem to do fine.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT