You of all people would be against accountability.
Pretty sure mshsaa is not funded by any tax dollars if that is what you are saying. They are not affiliated with the Dept of Education
No they are not given money from the DE but the Public does fund them as I said. Member schools fund them as well as the revenue from state events.
With the salaries they're paid, they need to produce some results.
I'm pretty sure nobody voted to make class .5 districts the way they are.
They are a bunch of knuckleheads. And yes, knuckleheads is my thing!
Here, here! Take notice, MoSports posters!! The term 'knuckleheads' is officially @mosofan 's thing.
WHOA HOOOOOO!!! Bosko likey!!Hopefully they see it didn't work this year and fix it for next year.
Here is the problem often some member schools have detached yes women school boards who don’t pay a dang bit of attention to sports and even have a huge dislike for the whole barbaric games of sports. This leads to administrations who are apathetic to the whole process and the outcome is what we get. So yes some of the blame is on the member schools and the public. But at the end of the day the people hired and paid a wage that is in the upper percentile of incomes across the state are not doing the job with ethics. While they speak out of the other side of their mouths and preach all that stuff their actions expose their blatant bias and corruption.
That's all good. Get enough easy paths to the final and you'll end up in class 3 again.
this response from this poster tells me the school so I don’t need to ask!
Well see you get people on the boards at MSHSAA....
Class 2 districts were compiled north and south!!! Bowling Green being in the west is a figment of one’s imagination!
The larger schools are representing more students. Why should a school that represents the interests of 100 kids get the same representation as a school that represents 1,500 student voices?
Except they did it the exact same way last year: BG was district 7 / Northwest region was district 8.
I agree why should bigger schools get more votes on issues?? I guess he is for people with bigger incomes and bigger households to have weighted voting as well in all types of elections and can cast more ballots.
Because the wants and needs of a 100 kids are as important as those same needs/wants of 1,500 kids in a different location.
How are you getting from how the govt elects Rep. to go to congress when those Reps are not under any Obligation to vote in mass with each other and they often don’t within states that have more Rep's based on populace. Now you want to apply that to a organization of member schools who choose to belong and then would agree to having reduced voting power and thus under represent their own interests always being a junior member? If you wanted it to mirror the House of Rep. then bigger schools would need elected members to cast those weighted votes among their own citizens as they might not all have the same idea's and interests of those now deciding how to cast votes.... so No there is zero correlation at all. A better correlation although not perfect would be the Senate each state get's equal number of Senators and each get one vote!
