MSHSAA might as well wait until all the small schools close

[r14veer]

My point was that the so called Dark one was well know for using the Bible for His own devious purposes in a twisted manner...... So toots using the Biblical references really really reeks of that.

Now if you are suggesting I'm a atheist that is far from the truth, I 100% believe in GOD but I don't 100% believe the Bible is Gods word written down by him through humans.

I get it now; I misunderstood what you were saying.

 

[cardsfan200306]

Really? Then please tell me how trademark laws work! Also, this is NOT America. Its MoSports!!

Big difference in speech and business, I can say the word buccees all day I can't operate a business named that. Not even close to same thing nincompoop.

Mosports is American nice try bozo

 

[BoosterBosko]

Strange because as someone well versed in Anthropology, Sociology, Criminal Justice and Psychology working in the latter for 30 yrs+ their have been a lot of brain mapping studies to gauge the level of empathy and compassion toward other humans. In fact those studies where mostly spurred on to determine what was the Root cause of human violence upon the so Called Others. In short how and why do what seems like well adjusted humans so easily devolve into genocide and mass homicide on what is often their neighbors.

And those studies have shown for the most part you are not correct. People's brains do not show the same emotion or empathy when shown video's or pictures of people who are different(Race, Religion, Culture, Sexual Orientation etc.) in distress, pain or danger. These are not learned traits at all as they also manifest in children as well again less or no empathy is shown in the mapping for those who appear different than from those who appear to be the same as the child. One study even went so far as to gauge how one's empathy level rose the closer the person looked to one's self even within peer groups ie.... that person looks like me so they could be a possible relative and how that empathy level fell the less a person looked like one's self.

These responses make perfect since when put into a evolutionary context where the battle for resources and territory was necessary for survival of your tribe. One of the first things we learned in Anthropology was that the first known meeting of two tribes of Modern Humans at a watering hole ended in extreme Violence, death and possible cannibalism. Humans do not have to be taught to be violent it is hardwired into us as a basic Flight or Fight survival.

This is no different in the Chimp kingdom...they are well known to organize war upon rival groups or to even kill within the their own Groups.

Of course you understand this because having a Master degree in biology you know that certain Genes are related to violence and aggression.

Now I want to say don't twist all this.... while Humans are prone to hate, fear and dislike the different and other and clearly that natural instinct can be nurtured and increased in a negative environment....we do have the ability to Control and Reject those ancient chemical reactions with logic and reason.

But one really needs to admit and address this issue from the bottom up and at the bottom is the fact we are hardwired to survive and that brings on a whole host of issues that are often not compatible with modern society.

Nice try, ChatGPT! You should meet the resident MoSports AI bot, @trumanbulldog42 ! You two would get along well!

 

[BoosterBosko]

Big difference in speech and business, I can say the word buccees all day I can't operate a business named that. Not even close to same thing nincompoop.

Mosports is American nice try bozo

You can trademark catch phrases and slogans! NICE TRY NINCOMPOOP!!

 

[trumanbulldog42]

Nice try, ChatGPT! You should meet the resident MoSports AI bot, @trumanbulldog42 ! You two would get along well!

Strange because as someone well versed in Anthropology, Sociology, Criminal Justice and Psychology working in the latter for 30 yrs+ their have been a lot of brain mapping studies to gauge the level of empathy and compassion toward other humans. In fact those studies where mostly spurred on to determine what was the Root cause of human violence upon the so Called Others. In short how and why do what seems like well adjusted humans so easily devolve into genocide and mass homicide on what is often their neighbors.

And those studies have shown for the most part you are not correct. People's brains do not show the same emotion or empathy when shown video's or pictures of people who are different(Race, Religion, Culture, Sexual Orientation etc.) in distress, pain or danger. These are not learned traits at all as they also manifest in children as well again less or no empathy is shown in the mapping for those who appear different than from those who appear to be the same as the child. One study even went so far as to gauge how one's empathy level rose the closer the person looked to one's self even within peer groups ie.... that person looks like me so they could be a possible relative and how that empathy level fell the less a person looked like one's self.

These responses make perfect since when put into a evolutionary context where the battle for resources and territory was necessary for survival of your tribe. One of the first things we learned in Anthropology was that the first known meeting of two tribes of Modern Humans at a watering hole ended in extreme Violence, death and possible cannibalism. Humans do not have to be taught to be violent it is hardwired into us as a basic Flight or Fight survival.

This is no different in the Chimp kingdom...they are well known to organize war upon rival groups or to even kill within the their own Groups.

Of course you understand this because having a Master degree in biology you know that certain Genes are related to violence and aggression.

Now I want to say don't twist all this.... while Humans are prone to hate, fear and dislike the different and other and clearly that natural instinct can be nurtured and increased in a negative environment....we do have the ability to Control and Reject those ancient chemical reactions with logic and reason.

But one really needs to admit and address this issue from the bottom up and at the bottom is the fact we are hardwired to survive and that brings on a whole host of issues that are often not compatible with modern society.

 

[cardsfan200306]

You can trademark catch phrases and slogans! NICE TRY NINCOMPOOP!!

you can but people can still use them as long as they are not operating a business with them, nice try clown move along

 

[Toots_mcgee]

And from YOUR pictures, you look like a stupid bird!! NICE TRY NINCOMPOOP!

That’s an eagle, our national bird you plump dooosh nozzle.

 

[BoosterBosko]

you can but people can still use them as long as they are not operating a business with them, nice try clown move along

Your knowledge of trademark laws is quite narrow. Trademark laws do prevent others from operating a business. They ALSO protect your brand's identity and reputation. It can also protect your intellectual property rights and prevent competitors from using similar phrases.

So by trademarking a catch phrase or slogan, you can stop people from using them. Even in non-business capacities. NICE TRY BOZO!!!

 

[BoosterBosko]

That’s an eagle, our national bird you plump dooosh nozzle.

Obviously thats an eagle. Doesnt mean its not a stupid bird!!! A national bird can still be stupid! NICE TRY!!!

 

[cardsfan200306]

Your knowledge of trademark laws is quite narrow. Trademark laws do prevent others from operating a business. They ALSO protect your brand's identity and reputation. It can also protect your intellectual property rights and prevent competitors from using similar phrases.

So by trademarking a catch phrase or slogan, you can stop people from using them. Even in non-business capacities. NICE TRY BOZO!!!

yeah cause noone walks around using trademarked phrases, furthermore the company would have no legal argument that a random human using their catchphrase is hurting their business it is in fact free advertising and any lawsuit would be thrown out.

furthermore if you want to get into trademark law please show me your trademark on any of your so called phrases.

once again clown move around you lose you get nothing

 

[BoosterBosko]

yeah cause noone walks around using trademarked phrases, furthermore the company would have no legal argument that a random human using their catchphrase is hurting their business it is in fact free advertising and any lawsuit would be thrown out.

furthermore if you want to get into trademark law please show me your trademark on any of your so called phrases.

once again clown move around you lose you get nothing

Obviously NONE of my catch phrases are actually trade marked. Be better!

But if a company does have a catch phrase or slogan trademarked, they can absolutely come after some random individual using it. Now granted, a company is usually going to go after someone who is more in the public eye. Like someone with a YouTube channel or what not. Because while you might see it as "free advertising" the company can see it infringement or creating confusion with the company's brand. Plenty of case law out there around this. NICE TRY!!

 

[HomeyR]

Man... does this 💩 💩 💩 💩 💩 💩 need to DIE !!!

 

[revno]

 

[trumanbulldog42]

Obviously NONE of my catch phrases are actually trade marked. Be better!

But if a company does have a catch phrase or slogan trademarked, they can absolutely come after some random individual using it. Now granted, a company is usually going to go after someone who is more in the public eye. Like someone with a YouTube channel or what not. Because while you might see it as "free advertising" the company can see it infringement or creating confusion with the company's brand. Plenty of case law out there around this. NICE TRY!!

HEY!! I think you did that on purpose!!! That's MY THING!!

 

[BoosterBosko]

HEY!! I think you did that on purpose!!! That's MY THING!!

 

[trumanbulldog42]

 

[cardsfan200306]

Obviously NONE of my catch phrases are actually trade marked. Be better!

But if a company does have a catch phrase or slogan trademarked, they can absolutely come after some random individual using it. Now granted, a company is usually going to go after someone who is more in the public eye. Like someone with a YouTube channel or what not. Because while you might see it as "free advertising" the company can see it infringement or creating confusion with the company's brand. Plenty of case law out there around this. NICE TRY!!

yeah sure! plenty of case law and lack there of lmao

 

[BoosterBosko]

yeah sure! plenty of case law and lack there of lmao

How can you have plenty of something but then also be lacking?? NICE TRY!!

 

[cardsfan200306]

How can you have plenty of something but then also be lacking?? NICE TRY!!

i mean you have plenty of sausage in your belly but lacking any leaving the pelvic region bahahahahaha

actually how you can have both is because of all the instances of trademark phrases being used maybe only 10% go to legal recourse, you dont have paper work on the other 90% so the 10 appears to be a lot

 

[BoosterBosko]

i mean you have plenty of sausage in your belly but lacking any leaving the pelvic region bahahahahaha

actually how you can have both is because of all the instances of trademark phrases being used maybe only 10% go to legal recourse, you dont have paper work on the other 90% so the 10 appears to be a lot

Do you have any sources? I'd like to learn about this. On either of your points. Sausages in my belly and the % of trademark cases that go to legal recourse. Lol

 

[cardsfan200306]

Do you have any sources? I'd like to learn about this. On either of your points. Sausages in my belly and the % of trademark cases that go to legal recourse. Lol

maybe if there wasnt so many sausages going in your mouth to your belly you could do your own research

 

[BoosterBosko]

maybe if there wasnt so many sausages going in your mouth to your belly you could do your own research

Ah. So one anecdotal source on the sausages and zero sources on trademark legal recourse. Got it.

If you want an EXPERT opinion on the sausages. Im more of a bacon guy! UNLESS you're talkin' brats. Then you're speaking my language!

 

[r14veer]

maybe if there wasnt so many sausages going in your mouth to your belly you could do your own research

 

[thetophat2021]

Ah. So one anecdotal source on the sausages and zero sources on trademark legal recourse. Got it.

If you want an EXPERT opinion on the sausages. Im more of a bacon guy! UNLESS you're talkin' brats. Then you're speaking my language!

 

[BoosterBosko]

WHOA HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! BOSKO LIKEY!!! Bosko DOUBLE likey!!!

 

[trumanbulldog42]

WHOA HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! BOSKO LIKEY!!! Bosko DOUBLE likey!!!

 

[BoosterBosko]

Its okay. As a bot, I wouldnt expect you to understand how a human could double likey that GIF. Those are some strong emotions even for humans. Much less a bot

 

[MGHS]

I don't think anyone, myself included, would argue against survival being humans #1 instinct. Because it absolutely is. But the fatal flaw in your argument is humans fighting for survival, resources, and/or territory. While that's all entirely true. Another tribe coming to take my territory. Another tribe coming to kill my tribe for food. Someone in my OWN tribe attempting to take my spot at the watering hole. These will all end in violence and are great examples of humans natural instinct to survive. However, that's not the case in the hate you're attempting to justify.

In my previous post, I used the examples of someone in a wheelchair simply rolling down the street or a gay person serving your food. Neither of these two are attempting anything remotely similar to what you have presented. Neither of these two are attempting to steal my resources, kill me, or take my spot at the watering hole. Now unless the person in a wheelchair is rolling down the sidewalk with a shotgun. Yelling, "I'm gonna kill you, you SOB!!" Or the gay server brings you your food and then attempts to stab you in the neck. Then your fight or flight response should probably kick in.

Simply seeing or even interacting with someone who is in a wheelchair, gay, or a minority should not trigger a fight or flight response. Much less hatred for simply existing.

Your missing my point and somewhat ignoring what data I pointed out. The Fear of the unknown or different manifest itself in the Form of Hate. I'm not saying that the emotion is rational, I'm saying those response are born from evolution and survival. We didn't develop those instincts as Modern Humans, you need to go much farther back when anything outside the Norm would mostly be conceived as a threat and treated as such.

The weak the different in all cultures have often had a very very rough go of it to put it lightly. If this hate isn't inborn then you must believe all hate is a nurtured and cultivated expression?

This isn't some theory I pulled from thin air this is pretty accepted within the Anthropological field and within the Mental health field.

I get you have a hard time accepting that when people perceive differences or oddities in a person it generates a negative emotion as opposed to Empathy, and that response is then generated into hate.

Let look at a disabled person and how through out most of early human history the weak, infirm and disabled where seen as a liability, a detriment to resources and a out right drain on the tribal structure. While we do have some instances of healing and protection, there are more examples of this not being the case at all and a grim outcome happened. What as a species is necessary for that to happen? Rational thought or a irrational emotional response?

Same with homosexual's in a small tribal setting with a limited breeding pool and life's only reason for existing is to beget the next generation, what would be the natural course of action to the possible over abundance of homosexual's be? For survival I think we all know what was the case.

As a biology oriented person I find it strange you seem to be a nurture over nature type.

 

[Veer2Eternity]

Your missing my point and somewhat ignoring what data I pointed out. The Fear of the unknown or different manifest itself in the Form of Hate. I'm not saying that the emotion is rational, I'm saying those response are born from evolution and survival. We didn't develop those instincts as Modern Humans, you need to go much farther back when anything outside the Norm would mostly be conceived as a threat and treated as such.

The weak the different in all cultures have often had a very very rough go of it to put it lightly. If this hate isn't inborn then you must believe all hate is a nurtured and cultivated expression?

This isn't some theory I pulled from thin air this is pretty accepted within the Anthropological field and within the Mental health field.

I get you have a hard time accepting that when people perceive differences or oddities in a person it generates a negative emotion as opposed to Empathy, and that response is then generated into hate.

Let look at a disabled person and how through out most of early human history the weak, infirm and disabled where seen as a liability, a detriment to resources and a out right drain on the tribal structure. While we do have some instances of healing and protection, there are more examples of this not being the case at all and a grim outcome happened. What as a species is necessary for that to happen? Rational thought or a irrational emotional response?

Same with homosexual's in a small tribal setting with a limited breeding pool and life's only reason for existing is to beget the next generation, what would be the natural course of action to the possible over abundance of homosexual's be? For survival I think we all know what was the case.

As a biology oriented person I find it strange you seem to be a nurture over nature type.

you type just to hear your keyboard click.

Phew.

 

[TadQueasy]

 

[The Last Black Man In Missouri]

lol that is football related. Schools will close. It's going to happen when this passes. You can whine about whatever. The pride flags? Meh. THe litter boxes. Didn't happen. it was always 'that other school'.

Phew.

Veer...the Litter box genie is out of the bottle

High school students identifying as cats & using litterboxes & leashes in class target of new crackdown with $25k fine - NewsBreak

A TEXAS bill is cracking down on students who use litter boxes and wear animal accessories like leashes and tails in class. The Forbidding Unlawful Represe

share.newsbreak.com

 

[shoot90draw]

As a biology oriented person I find it strange you seem to be a nurture over nature type.

I am equal parts nurtured and nature. Case in point, human evolution. The points you're making about survival are very applicable in a fight or flight type situation. However, that's isnt the case now. If simply seeing a gay, disabled, or some one from a minority group triggers hate and your need for survival, I'm not sure any science can help.

 

[Ap2493]

Me after reading the last three pages of this thread.

 

[BoosterBosko]

Your missing my point and somewhat ignoring what data I pointed out. The Fear of the unknown or different manifest itself in the Form of Hate. I'm not saying that the emotion is rational, I'm saying those response are born from evolution and survival. We didn't develop those instincts as Modern Humans, you need to go much farther back when anything outside the Norm would mostly be conceived as a threat and treated as such.

The weak the different in all cultures have often had a very very rough go of it to put it lightly. If this hate isn't inborn then you must believe all hate is a nurtured and cultivated expression?

This isn't some theory I pulled from thin air this is pretty accepted within the Anthropological field and within the Mental health field.

I get you have a hard time accepting that when people perceive differences or oddities in a person it generates a negative emotion as opposed to Empathy, and that response is then generated into hate.

Let look at a disabled person and how through out most of early human history the weak, infirm and disabled where seen as a liability, a detriment to resources and a out right drain on the tribal structure. While we do have some instances of healing and protection, there are more examples of this not being the case at all and a grim outcome happened. What as a species is necessary for that to happen? Rational thought or a irrational emotional response?

Same with homosexual's in a small tribal setting with a limited breeding pool and life's only reason for existing is to beget the next generation, what would be the natural course of action to the possible over abundance of homosexual's be? For survival I think we all know what was the case.

As a biology oriented person I find it strange you seem to be a nurture over nature type.

 

[Toots_mcgee]

Me after reading the last three pages of this thread.

This should clear up MG’s issues for you.

 

[Veer2Eternity]

Veer...the Litter box genie is out of the bottle

High school students identifying as cats & using litterboxes & leashes in class target of new crackdown with $25k fine - NewsBreak

A TEXAS bill is cracking down on students who use litter boxes and wear animal accessories like leashes and tails in class. The Forbidding Unlawful Represe

share.newsbreak.com

Still no litter boxes found. It's VAST FURRY CONSPIRACY!!!11!!!!eleven!!11!!!

 

[r14veer]

Me after reading the last three pages of this thread.

 

[shoot90draw]

Is that Kane and the Mox!?

 

[BoosterBosko]

Is that Kane and the Mox!?

Kane does enjoy a good party. As long the party has booze, Kane aint asking too many questions!

 

[cardsfan200306]

you type just to hear your keyboard click.

Phew.

Ok pot meet kettle