ADVERTISEMENT

MSHSAA might as well wait until all the small schools close

My point was that the so called Dark one was well know for using the Bible for His own devious purposes in a twisted manner...... So toots using the Biblical references really really reeks of that.

Now if you are suggesting I'm a atheist that is far from the truth, I 100% believe in GOD but I don't 100% believe the Bible is Gods word written down by him through humans.

I get it now; I misunderstood what you were saying.
 
Really? Then please tell me how trademark laws work! Also, this is NOT America. Its MoSports!!

Big difference in speech and business, I can say the word buccees all day I can't operate a business named that. Not even close to same thing nincompoop.

Mosports is American nice try bozo
 
Strange because as someone well versed in Anthropology, Sociology, Criminal Justice and Psychology working in the latter for 30 yrs+ their have been a lot of brain mapping studies to gauge the level of empathy and compassion toward other humans. In fact those studies where mostly spurred on to determine what was the Root cause of human violence upon the so Called Others. In short how and why do what seems like well adjusted humans so easily devolve into genocide and mass homicide on what is often their neighbors.

And those studies have shown for the most part you are not correct. People's brains do not show the same emotion or empathy when shown video's or pictures of people who are different(Race, Religion, Culture, Sexual Orientation etc.) in distress, pain or danger. These are not learned traits at all as they also manifest in children as well again less or no empathy is shown in the mapping for those who appear different than from those who appear to be the same as the child. One study even went so far as to gauge how one's empathy level rose the closer the person looked to one's self even within peer groups ie.... that person looks like me so they could be a possible relative and how that empathy level fell the less a person looked like one's self.

These responses make perfect since when put into a evolutionary context where the battle for resources and territory was necessary for survival of your tribe. One of the first things we learned in Anthropology was that the first known meeting of two tribes of Modern Humans at a watering hole ended in extreme Violence, death and possible cannibalism. Humans do not have to be taught to be violent it is hardwired into us as a basic Flight or Fight survival.

This is no different in the Chimp kingdom...they are well known to organize war upon rival groups or to even kill within the their own Groups.

Of course you understand this because having a Master degree in biology you know that certain Genes are related to violence and aggression.

Now I want to say don't twist all this.... while Humans are prone to hate, fear and dislike the different and other and clearly that natural instinct can be nurtured and increased in a negative environment....we do have the ability to Control and Reject those ancient chemical reactions with logic and reason.

But one really needs to admit and address this issue from the bottom up and at the bottom is the fact we are hardwired to survive and that brings on a whole host of issues that are often not compatible with modern society.
Nice try, ChatGPT! You should meet the resident MoSports AI bot, @trumanbulldog42 ! You two would get along well!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: shoot90draw
Nice try, ChatGPT! You should meet the resident MoSports AI bot, @trumanbulldog42 ! You two would get along well!

Strange because as someone well versed in Anthropology, Sociology, Criminal Justice and Psychology working in the latter for 30 yrs+ their have been a lot of brain mapping studies to gauge the level of empathy and compassion toward other humans. In fact those studies where mostly spurred on to determine what was the Root cause of human violence upon the so Called Others. In short how and why do what seems like well adjusted humans so easily devolve into genocide and mass homicide on what is often their neighbors.

And those studies have shown for the most part you are not correct. People's brains do not show the same emotion or empathy when shown video's or pictures of people who are different(Race, Religion, Culture, Sexual Orientation etc.) in distress, pain or danger. These are not learned traits at all as they also manifest in children as well again less or no empathy is shown in the mapping for those who appear different than from those who appear to be the same as the child. One study even went so far as to gauge how one's empathy level rose the closer the person looked to one's self even within peer groups ie.... that person looks like me so they could be a possible relative and how that empathy level fell the less a person looked like one's self.

These responses make perfect since when put into a evolutionary context where the battle for resources and territory was necessary for survival of your tribe. One of the first things we learned in Anthropology was that the first known meeting of two tribes of Modern Humans at a watering hole ended in extreme Violence, death and possible cannibalism. Humans do not have to be taught to be violent it is hardwired into us as a basic Flight or Fight survival.

This is no different in the Chimp kingdom...they are well known to organize war upon rival groups or to even kill within the their own Groups.

Of course you understand this because having a Master degree in biology you know that certain Genes are related to violence and aggression.

Now I want to say don't twist all this.... while Humans are prone to hate, fear and dislike the different and other and clearly that natural instinct can be nurtured and increased in a negative environment....we do have the ability to Control and Reject those ancient chemical reactions with logic and reason.

But one really needs to admit and address this issue from the bottom up and at the bottom is the fact we are hardwired to survive and that brings on a whole host of issues that are often not compatible with modern society.
giphy.gif
 
you can but people can still use them as long as they are not operating a business with them, nice try clown move along
Your knowledge of trademark laws is quite narrow. Trademark laws do prevent others from operating a business. They ALSO protect your brand's identity and reputation. It can also protect your intellectual property rights and prevent competitors from using similar phrases.

So by trademarking a catch phrase or slogan, you can stop people from using them. Even in non-business capacities. NICE TRY BOZO!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: shoot90draw
Your knowledge of trademark laws is quite narrow. Trademark laws do prevent others from operating a business. They ALSO protect your brand's identity and reputation. It can also protect your intellectual property rights and prevent competitors from using similar phrases.

So by trademarking a catch phrase or slogan, you can stop people from using them. Even in non-business capacities. NICE TRY BOZO!!!
yeah cause noone walks around using trademarked phrases, furthermore the company would have no legal argument that a random human using their catchphrase is hurting their business it is in fact free advertising and any lawsuit would be thrown out.

furthermore if you want to get into trademark law please show me your trademark on any of your so called phrases.

once again clown move around you lose you get nothing
Lose Willy Wonka GIF
 
  • Wow
Reactions: shoot90draw
yeah cause noone walks around using trademarked phrases, furthermore the company would have no legal argument that a random human using their catchphrase is hurting their business it is in fact free advertising and any lawsuit would be thrown out.

furthermore if you want to get into trademark law please show me your trademark on any of your so called phrases.

once again clown move around you lose you get nothing
Lose Willy Wonka GIF
Obviously NONE of my catch phrases are actually trade marked. Be better!

But if a company does have a catch phrase or slogan trademarked, they can absolutely come after some random individual using it. Now granted, a company is usually going to go after someone who is more in the public eye. Like someone with a YouTube channel or what not. Because while you might see it as "free advertising" the company can see it infringement or creating confusion with the company's brand. Plenty of case law out there around this. NICE TRY!!
 
Obviously NONE of my catch phrases are actually trade marked. Be better!

But if a company does have a catch phrase or slogan trademarked, they can absolutely come after some random individual using it. Now granted, a company is usually going to go after someone who is more in the public eye. Like someone with a YouTube channel or what not. Because while you might see it as "free advertising" the company can see it infringement or creating confusion with the company's brand. Plenty of case law out there around this. NICE TRY!!
HEY!! I think you did that on purpose!!! That's MY THING!!
 
Obviously NONE of my catch phrases are actually trade marked. Be better!

But if a company does have a catch phrase or slogan trademarked, they can absolutely come after some random individual using it. Now granted, a company is usually going to go after someone who is more in the public eye. Like someone with a YouTube channel or what not. Because while you might see it as "free advertising" the company can see it infringement or creating confusion with the company's brand. Plenty of case law out there around this. NICE TRY!!
yeah sure! plenty of case law and lack there of lmao
 
How can you have plenty of something but then also be lacking?? NICE TRY!!
i mean you have plenty of sausage in your belly but lacking any leaving the pelvic region bahahahahaha

actually how you can have both is because of all the instances of trademark phrases being used maybe only 10% go to legal recourse, you dont have paper work on the other 90% so the 10 appears to be a lot
 
i mean you have plenty of sausage in your belly but lacking any leaving the pelvic region bahahahahaha

actually how you can have both is because of all the instances of trademark phrases being used maybe only 10% go to legal recourse, you dont have paper work on the other 90% so the 10 appears to be a lot
Do you have any sources? I'd like to learn about this. On either of your points. Sausages in my belly and the % of trademark cases that go to legal recourse. Lol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: shoot90draw
maybe if there wasnt so many sausages going in your mouth to your belly you could do your own research
Ah. So one anecdotal source on the sausages and zero sources on trademark legal recourse. Got it.

If you want an EXPERT opinion on the sausages. Im more of a bacon guy! UNLESS you're talkin' brats. Then you're speaking my language!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: shoot90draw
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT