MSHSAA might as well wait until all the small schools close
- Thread starter Veer2Eternity
- Start date
No i will refer to them as their given name so once again you are wrong. That's the issue as well. You cannot force us to participate in your mental illness
Be careful with talk like this. Apparently in a free society it's okay to hate others for simply being themselves. At least that's what one poster was advocating for!
LOL I'm saying it's anyone's God given right to hate. And yes it's Okay to hate if you so desire. Why are you so against someone exercising their freedom and hating?
Sure some people do and some people hate the Majority or those who are near genetic perfection or heterosexual in nature. A lot of people hate religions or atheist to. The point is people have the right to hate, now acting on that hate is a whole other topic.
Sorry you are correct I sometimes get Pol Pot and Mao Tse-Tung switched...
And yes it's Okay to hate anyone.. again it's how you control that emotion that matters. To deny human nature and human emotion is counter productive.
I have no issue with a Male pretending to be a Female and adopting a female name or vice versa. It's freedom to do so. But I also have no issue with People not feeding into to that fantasy or delusion and not participating in their delusion... that is also freedom.
People are under no obligation to Like, Love, or Accept those outside the Norm's of society. People do have a legal obligation to tolerate them to a degree but that is all. Hating them, disliking them is well within the bounds of normal human behavior.
I often have people in a session tell me they hate no one and my stock response is then you are a unreliable historian. AKA a liar. Funny thing is they will deny this but then begin to describe in text book fashion the emotion of hate toward their Siblings, Parents, Foster parents, Teachers, Aunts, Uncles etc.
Denying the emotion of hate, would be like denying you are happy, sad, or in love and they are not emotions people feel in their lives, everyone has felt hate.
Last edited:
Yes it's Ok to hate someone in a Free society. ... But it's not OK to act violently or coercive to those you hate because in a civilized society we have laws to protect people from such acts and rightfully so.
But Hate is a Normal human emotion that cannot be wished away or denied either.
So yes. Hate might be considered a natural human emotion but it's not a blanket application. Case in point, there is a MASSIVE difference in hating your siblings, parents, foster parents, teachers, aunts, or uncles. Compared to hating some random gay, disabled, or minority person you don't even know, just because they are gay, disabled, or a minority. One of these things isn't like the other
Don’t drag me into this- no opinion
Why am I AGAINST someone HATING another person for simply EXISTING!? You really DONT think before you post! NICE TRY NINCOMPOOP!!!!
I don't disagree in principle with the basic premise that in a free society it is one of many rights to hate and that manifestations of hate that do another person harm are what is to be avoided, but is "God-given" the best phrase to use here?
Be sure to let us all know how your weightlifting goes this spring/summer, Bosko!
WHOA HOOOO! BOSKO LIKEY!! As does @J. Kane
Be sure to let us all know how your weightlifting goes this spring/summer, Bosko!
I hate a lot of things. Like lining up in shotgun on fourth and short.
I hate shotgun period. It's just one more thing you have to get right before a play can even start.
It's not my offense of choice, but I do like it. I'm more of a flexbone type, but I don't mind supplementing the flexbone with some wing T plays, especially bucksweep and trap.
I remember that Ray Pec used to run that to death (of their opponent) back when they were beating everyone in the early 2000's.
I hate to be pedantic, but that’s not a grammar issue.
Correct they are different, hating something that is outside the Norm and Different is hate born of our biological defense mechanism and genetic survival instincts. Hating those close to you is way worse and often counter productive and born of other emotions envy, power dynamics etc.
You can be against what ever you desire..... but others can freely hate others for simply existing or being born. IF you truly embrace freedom of choice then you should have no problem with others hating as long as they don't enact violence or coercion upon those they hate.
Why would a Atheist spout Christian rhetoric? And there is no doubt people Manipulate to try and garner empathy and sympathy for self centered personal gain. Using lies, emotional blackmail and not taking responsibility for one's own self determination and choices and expecting others to pay the Bills is as vile and evil as authoritarianism. I am not my brothers keeper.
As someone with a masters in biology, you are grossly over estimating hate. IF hate was hard wired into our survival instincts it would be closer to "I hate bears because that could kill me. I'd better run." Or "I hate that venomous snake because it could kill me." Not even remotely close to walking down the street, seeing someone in wheelchair and thinking, "I hate you because you're in a wheelchair!" Or when ordering food and your server is gay you think, "Another gay person?? I hate them!"
Neither of those last two examples have ANYTHING to do with our biology or hardwired instinct to survive.
Last edited:
Hard science vs. soft science pretending it's hard science.
Exactly! Thank you for agreeing. The hate MGHS is trying justify as simple survival instinct makes zero sense!
NERD ALERT!!!! But I get your point. NICE TRY @MGHS !!!
Sounds like you need to review the "Whats YOUR Thing" thread! Because "NERD ALERT" is one of MY things! I've tagged you for easy finding.
Whoa Nelly I am THE MOSports head nerd, Bosko!
Well, crap. You brought this on all of us if it starts a holy war: How can an atheist know either what God is "about" or what is "God-given" or what is "evil?" To an atheist, good and evil should have no absolute meaning; they're both arbitrarily relative to the individual. To appear to argue from a theistic perspective about rights and free-will as an atheist (complete with Bible reference) is arguing in bad faith (arguing a point or from a perspective you don't believe in order to "win" the argument).
Now, we all know that bad-faith arguments are this forum's lifeblood, so let's dispense with the notion that you aren't also doing that at times, including now.
