More importantly, what do we think MGHS was insinuating there?It is widely recognized as the worst Supreme Court decision in history.
Wrong! That is your opinion. The constitution does not mention AR15s or 30 round clips. It only grants citizens the right to bear arms. A precedent has been set - not all weapons are legal.Nobody is trying to change your mind.... but the constitution and Supreme Court have ruled on this and People do have the Right to a AR-15 with 30 round clips so your belief has nothing do with it.
So the established federal armed forces we have now is detrimental to our rights? Where the hell would we be without them? You do have some VERY strange beliefs.That is the complete opposite of why the wrote the 2nd Amendment. The founding fathers hated the idea of a Standing Federal Army as they saw it was detriment to freedom and rights.
This is not a up for debate they actually wrote about this and it's easily researchable. Jefferson wrote Every Citizen must be a solider
James Madison... described as Standing Army as the greatest mischief that can happen
Teachinghistory.org
teachinghistory.org
George Mason Once a Standing Army is established in any country the people lose their liberty
Alexander Hamilton If circumstances at anytime oblige the govt. to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow citizens. This appears to be the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, AND THE BEST POSSIBLE SECURITY AGAINST IT, if it should exist.
That is pretty blatant right there....
The 2nd Amendment has NOTHING to do with a regulated national Military it is just the Opposite.....the founding fathers wanted a well armed Citizenship ready to fight at a moments notice and not controlled by the Federal Govt.
Don't do that. Those parents have been through enough.This would help. Show the Sandy Hook pictures.
The difference is that abortion was not spelled out in the Constitution as a foundational right for the whole country.... clearly states can now and should rule on that and let the people decide through a vote or elected officials.Like abortion?
So heller/Bruno are the worst Supreme Court Decision in history or the recent ruling on Abortion RVW? Really?It is widely recognized as the worst Supreme Court decision in history.
Again not my opinion it's the Ruling of those who legally entrusted to make those decisions which is the Supreme Court and they decided the people get to choose what weapons are a common use weapon.Wrong! That is your opinion. The constitution does not mention AR15s or 30 round clips. It only grants citizens the right to bear arms. A precedent has been set - not all weapons are legal.
Those Federal Armed forces very well could be detrimental to our rights if you don't see that then I can't help you understand. Every Authoritarian regime has had the backing of the Federal Troops. A standing Military always enforces the Oligarchy will.So the established federal armed forces we have now is detrimental to our rights? Where the hell would we be without them? You do have some VERY strange beliefs.
I guess if they had any idea what kind force the army could bring in this day they would have realized we the people would not stand a chance if they decide to put us under their thumb. You may your AR-15 but they have lots more firepower plus some nice jets and bombs and the like. One reason we should NEVER allow Donald J. Trump anywhere near the WH again.Those Federal Armed forces very well could be detrimental to our rights if you don't see that then I can't help you understand. Every Authoritarian regime has had the backing of the Federal Troops. A standing Military always enforces the Oligarchy will.
The Founding Fathers understood this.. where would the British Empire of been without the Red Coats to enforce the Kings Power?
Where would Putin Be if he didn't have the Power of his Military leaders to enforce his Totalitarian regime.
I'm very divided on the Massive Military we have and the Military Industrial Complex that President Eisenhower warned us about. While having a Volunteer Army that is powerful and technologically advanced on the World Stage gives America Power and Control..... I am not ignorant enough to not be wary of and understand that our Military Might could easily be used as a Oppressive Force on American Citizens to destroy the Republic.
What is strange is that you don't see that my belief's and concerns about a Standing Federal Force is rooted in the beliefs and idea's of the very people who wrote and crafted the Constitution. I guess if you actually take the time to read Jefferson, Madison, Hamilton etc. you would have a better understanding.
You clearly didn't learn anything from Vietnam/Afghan and the tactics to destroy a vastly superior technological force.I guess if they had any idea what kind force the army could bring in this day they would have realized we the people would not stand a chance if they decide to put us under their thumb. You may your AR-15 but they have lots more firepower plus some nice jets and bombs and the like. One reason we should NEVER allow Donald J. Trump anywhere near the WH again.
You know everything about everything, you tell us how many would follow orders? Do you really think it would be enough you and other folks with AR-15's to have shot at fending them off?You clearly didn't learn anything from Vietnam/Afghan and the tactics to destroy a vastly superior technological force.
You also make a bold assumption that all the Military would Follow those in Power... Of course some would but things are not as clear cut as you assume. How many of the People at the Jan. 6th where former Military/LEO personal you might ask yourself that question.
I was talking about Dred Scott. Don’t forget to read the context.So heller/Bruno are the worst Supreme Court Decision in history or the recent ruling on Abortion RVW? Really?
13 Worst Supreme Court Decisions of All Time - FindLaw
Every once in awhile, the Supreme Court will decide a case that has widespread social and political impact, striking down discriminatory laws, upholding cherished institutions, protecting individual liberties. But not all Supreme Court opinions are great. Most are boring, technical, and of...www.findlaw.com
Top 6 Worst Supreme Court Decisions in History
1. Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) I explained elsewhere, 'Although we all learn about the 1857 Dred Scott decision in school, we aren't usually told that it actually should be called the Harriet and Dred Scott decision, since Scott's wife was also a plaintiff in the suit. History.com explains...www.juancole.com
15 Supreme Court Decisions that Shredded the Constitution | Sean J. Rosenthal
From Slaughter-House to Obamacare, the Supreme Court has often abdicated its responsibility to limit state power.fee.org
I don't think anybody adds in Heller/Bruno in that category.
Clearly Dredd Scott and Plessy is the Worst ever and have been swept away.
I know the 2A is very problematic to the Left who wants to tightly control and oppress gun ownership and thwart the very intent of the Amendment. It being built into the Constitution makes it near impossible so those who hate the idea have to make wide leaps and bounds to try and reinvent the meaning and reason behind the Founding Fathers Idea's on guns... guns that most of them carried daily.
Trump and the radical right would love to start a civil war. Luckily, the Pentagon knows he's friggin nuts.You know everything about everything, you tell us how many would follow orders? Do you really think it would be enough you and other folks with AR'15's to have shot at fending them off?
Like I said THIS is why Trump should never be in charge of our military again!
Majorie Taylor Greene says the civil war has already started.Trump and the radical right would love to start a civil war. Luckily, the Pentagon knows he's friggin nuts.
And how many millions of Americans were disgusted by the whole Jan 6 shit show? Millions more than approved!!How many of the People at the Jan. 6th where former Military/LEO personal you might ask yourself that question.
Science fiction? What are you talking about those tactics have stood the test of time with guerilla warfare.... and if you don't think it could happen you clearly don't study history.This has certainly turned into science fiction. I'll wait a while to dig my bunker.
Yes.... but that is not what I'm talking about. A bunch of rabble rousers attacking the capital is not supported by many. I orderly successionAnd how many millions of Americans were disgusted by the whole Jan 6 shit show? Millions more than approved!!
Science fiction? What are you talking about those tactics have stood the test of time with guerilla warfare.... and if you don't think it could happen you clearly don't study history.
Show the pics of the kids in texas that got evaporated.
This is not about Politics at all per say Policies and Laws are not the catalyst for this type of stuff. So in that sense you are correct most People are not engaged deeply in PoliticsMost Americans are ridiculously apathetic about politics. Why in the world would you fight (and die) for something you know nothing about and care nothing about? You wouldn’t.
So, what will happen is that the fringe lunatics will have a tiny pathetic fringe “rebellion” where they take over a building or two of little consequence (most likely full of federal office workers), hole up in it for a bit and then eventually surrender. They’ll think they accomplished something, but the truth is that life will move on without them and their pathetic ideology and they’ll be little more than a blip in history until the next generation forgets them entirely. Nothing over the long term of history suggests that societies will become more conservative in their collective beliefs. Right or wrong, it’s the curse of conservatism: you’ll win here and there, but the arrow of history points only one way. All you are is a failing set of brakes.
What have they been locked out of?Never under estimate the brutality and willingness to cause carnage from the Male Demographic age 18-40 that has been disenfranchised and marginalized. A demographic that has been locked out of the system and has turned it's back on education for the most part.
This is not about Politics at all per say Policies and Laws are not the catalyst for this type of stuff. So in that sense you are correct most People are not engaged deeply in Politics
. Politics is just the window dressing to Fire up the masses.
You fail to factor in the Human Need of belonging to a cause greater than a person's self and the fact a group of people are being neglected and oppressed.
This is a time honored tradition of the Socialist and Communist revolutions that have taken over Countries. This can easily be weaponized by the Conservatives as well.
Charismatic leaders and the oppression of marginalized groups have often led to upheaval on a grand scale. This is also a Historic Fact.... Believing it's not possible in America in this day and age is a bit short sighted IMO, I mean the very country was founded on not paying $$$ to the Crown.
Never under estimate the brutality and willingness to cause carnage from the Male Demographic age 18-40 that has been disenfranchised and marginalized. A demographic that has been locked out of the system and has turned it's back on education for the most part.
With the advent of Social Media and Such ... you don't have to print pamphlets and have secret meetings in the basement to Gin up support for the cause what ever that maybe....
I find it interesting you dismiss the possibility so easily? After what Happened in Portland with Chaz being taken over, the Federal building under siege for weeks, BLM riots for Months.... and then Jan. 6th?
Saying it will only be a blip? With 76 million Americans freaking Voting for Narcissistic Trump just because he wasn't a Lefty like Biden says something about the state of America. Clearly That show's a pretty big divide in the Culture across the Nation.
And yes Free Countries do tend to become more and more liberal until they.... often fade into obscurity or collapse.
I will say this that with the Decreased birth rate of the Left and the turn to Conservatism of parents with Children then long term America could very likely buck the trend and America moves to the middle again. But as you said that is not the Historical timeline.
Having children makes parents more conservative, study finds
Tulane University News and Press Releasesnews.tulane.edu
Having children, not growing old, makes you more right-wing—especially in the U.S.
Study suggests that maternal and paternal behaviors, not getting older, prompt shifts in social attitudes.fortune.com
That's a good point.The fact that such a tiny bloc of people even bother to vote here shows me what I need to know about any kind of sustained rebellion. No one wants to be inconvenienced for very long.
They’d be speaking to a manager in no time.That's a good point.
Make MO Magas stand in line to vote like blacks in urban GA do.
They'd wilt.
Snowflakes.They’d be speaking to a manager in no time.
Snowflakes.
I saw some of those folks in GA stood in line for over 8 hours. That is disenfranchisement to a T. The Rs shut down polling places in urban areas so it's like that.
I'm sure it depends on different circumstances. My point is that Young Males are not going to College or even finishing or thriving in High School.What have they been locked out of?
Are they the ones who turned their back on education or is it the system that has?
I never said there wasn't systemic biases... In fact up until the 60's and 70's systemic bias was built into the system. That has changed and is illegal as it should be so now the system is hard baked with biases... People still do have those biases and Probably always will to a degree.I think MG just made a case for the existence of "systemic" biases.
I never mentioned race..... Why do you interject that into everything.. I Said the young male demographic.Which he will deny later
White males being “disenfranchised” is some rich stuff. So they don’t have total control over every aspect of our lives??
Shame.
I used to think that people under 40 wanting to be famous was the worst thing about our society. But “playing the victim” has blown it out of the water.