Any idea why coaches would vote it down? Lose rivalries?
Cheapens the post-season tournament.Any idea why coaches would vote it down? Lose rivalries?
At least they're not allowed to host state title games at their own stadium. Not that would be an unfair advantage!My take on private schools has always been this: If you can afford to send your child to a private school, then you are probably doing decent financially. Which means you can also likely afford to send your child to athletic camps in the off season, you can afford to pay for the better, top notch summer leagues, you can afford private tennis and golf lessons from top not professionals. All of which helps a child become a better athlete. If your child likes a certain sport, you send him/her to the private school that excels in that sport every year.
Is there a certain degree of recruiting? Possibly, by a few schools, but not by all private schools.
The reason it gets voted down is very simple. Very few schools in the state are affected by the private school issue. There's only a small handful of private schools in Class 1 and Class 2 and rarely are any of those schools a true threat to make any noise in the basketball playoffs. In the other three classes, there are several that are strong contenders most years (Barstow, Tolton, Borgia, Chaminade, CBC, etc). And while these are the schools the get the focus, it's still a small sample. How many schools even care if Barstow wins state in Class 3? Does East Prairie, Twin Rivers, Doniphan, Fredericktown even care? They have very little chance of ever playing a private school unless they made it out of district play. So right there you've got another handful of schools that have no reason or interest to vote yes on a private/public separation. The ones that care are the ones that get hit by the private school roadblock. A team like Strafford, which has had strong teams recently but run into the Barstow juggernaut that has most of its lineup from the state of Kansas. Is that fair? From that perspective I can definitely see why they would need to separate them. Although that still wouldn't deal with the public school fiasco that happens in St. Louis with all these players transferring to Vashon. That's a whole other issue.
East Prairie, Twin Rivers, Doniphan, Fredericktown...etc, etc. SE Missouri- private schools aren't their problem. SCC and Charleston are. And they're as public as it gets. So they have to find other excuses.
Sorry, I misunderstood your point.That's my point. Which is why the public/private issue always gets voted down.
If I were them (and I'm not), that's exactly what I would do.I am all for 1 division. I've seen lower classes not win their state titles but beat the upper class state champion before. MSHSAA would lose a lot of money if that happens. If MSHSAA does separate private and public, what keeps the private schools from dropping out of MSHSAA all together and doing their own association?
I am all for 1 division. I've seen lower classes not win their state titles but beat the upper class state champion before. MSHSAA would lose a lot of money if that happens. If MSHSAA does separate private and public, what keeps the private schools from dropping out of MSHSAA all together and doing their own association?
So you were asking for people's opinions so that you could assail them? Lovely. So glad you're here.At least we all know how unreasonable your view is now. We don't have 12 divisions like Nebraska (or whatever it is) but why should an orange have to compete in a best apple contest?