ADVERTISEMENT

"There are plenty of Class 4 teams that can beat Kearney."

JoeyNorthlandoKCMO

Well-Known Member
BlizzardX quote of the year...

"The biggest difference between Kearney, Staley, Park Hill, Fort and LN is size, strength, explosiveness, speed and depth. After that, that's where they get ya.
Yes, Kearney is going to do well in the playoffs, perhaps pull off an upset. Kearney is Kearney, they are over achievers and giant killers at times. But faced with equal tradition, and few more skill players they are over-matched and nature takes over. They are a marvel of getting the most of what they have, but it's not enough when that can't run as fast (Lol). I think there are plenty of class 4 teams out there that can beat Kearney."

Yeah, 15-5 against those teams Blizz...but since Kearney is Class 4, and even thought they have done better against common opponents than Fort, Park Hill and Staley...they must be inferior. I mean, they are class 4..
 
Kearney is one of the best coached teams in the NWMO, KCMO area. Jones and co have those kids so well prepared week in and week out. I'll be shocked if Kearney doesn't win Saturday and easily. There is ONE class 4 team that can beat Kearney this year and they'll meet at the dome. I'm not counting Kearney out in that one either.
 
BlizzardX quote of the year...

"The biggest difference between Kearney, Staley, Park Hill, Fort and LN is size, strength, explosiveness, speed and depth. After that, that's where they get ya.
Yes, Kearney is going to do well in the playoffs, perhaps pull off an upset. Kearney is Kearney, they are over achievers and giant killers at times. But faced with equal tradition, and few more skill players they are over-matched and nature takes over. They are a marvel of getting the most of what they have, but it's not enough when that can't run as fast (Lol). I think there are plenty of class 4 teams out there that can beat Kearney."

Yeah, 15-5 against those teams Blizz...but since Kearney is Class 4, and even thought they have done better against common opponents than Fort, Park Hill and Staley...they must be inferior. I mean, they are class 4..
Buffy, all of this was written in the context of 2015 seasonNo way to settle the argument. Kearney didn't play S, PH and FO this year. The past has little to do with 2015. Having seen all of these teams play, I do think Kearney would lose those 3 games. I stand by what I wrote. K vs Staley is Kearney's super bowl. From Staley's standpoint, it's an annoying little game.
I'm flattered you re-visited and re-posted my writing. If Kearney beats Webb in the final, then that only say's the great Webb has fallen. Not that Kearney is any better than those 4 teams in 2015.

If you want to continue to talk recent past let's look at the scores of the games versus Lee's Summit Schools. Say, when LSW won it all. K, barely beat FO on a questionable call at FO and was turbo-clocked out of the stadium vs LSW. A team they played well in the first half, but soon found out that faster kid's run faster than slower kid's.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: alongquads
Staley is
Buffy, all of this was written in the context of 2015 seasonNo way to settle the argument. Kearney didn't play S, PH and FO this year. The past has little to do with 2015. Having seen all of these teams play, I do think Kearney would lose those 3 games. I stand by what I wrote. K vs Staley is Kearney's little super bowl. From Staley's standpoint, it's an annoying little game.
I'm flattered you re-visited and re-posted my writing. If Kearney beats Webb in the final, then that only say's the great Webb has fallen. Not that Kearney is any better than those 4 teams in 2015.
By history, by any rational metric, and by performance... you are wrong and have no credibility. Even 810 Varsity has Kearney ranked higher than Staley or Park Hill. Calpreps has them ranked higher than all three. Staley found Kearney annoying because they got their ass beaten by them (42-0) and (28-7) in 2013. Kearney's history with them is one of domination. A Super Bowl? Hardly...why would anyone think a team that you are 6-3 against is a Super Bowl...now you are starting to sound like a Platte County fan, and think there is some sort of rivalry? BlizzTARD strikes again.
 
Last edited:
Staley is

By history, by any rational metric, and by performance... you are wrong and have no credibility. Even 810 Varsity has Kearney ranked higher than Staley or Park Hill. Calpreps has them ranked higher than all three. Staley found Kearney annoying because they got their ass beaten by them (42-0) and (28-7) in 2013. Kearney's history with them is one of domination. A Super Bowl? Hardly...why would anyone think a team that you are 6-3 against is a Super Bowl...now you are starting to sound like a Platte County fan, and think there is some sort of rivalry?
810 varsity doesn't follow HS football. They re-print irrational rankings from the 2001.
 
I give you Fort...they might be able to squeak by Kearney. Their defense is inferior to Kearney, but their offense is ...well, wait a minute... No Kearney would beat them again like their did in the Class 5 quarters two years ago.
Joey, at least your thinking in the context of 2015.
 
If you want to continue to talk recent past let's look at the scores of the games versus Lee's Summit Schools. Say Class 5 Sched, when LSW won it all. K, barely beat FO on a questionable call at FO and was turbo-clocked out of the stadium vs LSW. A team they played well in the first half, but soon found out that faster kid's run faster than slower kid's.

In 2013-14 they gave up 77 to Lee's Summit and 42 to LSW. Beat LN by one point. Beat a down Staley team 2 times that season. One by blowout, the other by 21. Shall I go on?
Ok...In 2012-2013 6-3 reg season losses to Ray South, Staley PC, Beat LN by 4, Beat Tonka in 2 OT's Lost to Staley, and Park Hill South in C5 playoffs. "Figure it Out" Buffy. pile on more doo doo using the C5 playoff success.

Kearney is good. A well coached great program. Year in and out always a team that is tops in KC for they have what two SC's ?

Look at KHS success in C5. How can any rational person not see this. Buffoon's can't see the fallacy of their reasoning. Kearney is no Webb, but who they heck is? And who can somehow summon the ghosts of past success and beat the crap out of people like they consistently do other than Webb.

Class 4 Playoffs in recent times have not been kind either since they won it all in 2009-10. Oh PC and Savannah come to mind without looking it up.

In 2008-09 championship game that team was awesome. No one argues that was one of the greatest most physical teams in KHS lore. A team that would woop this year's team.
Until KHS get's those dominant athlete's that like they had back yonder...please
 
Last edited:
If you want to continue to talk recent past let's look at the scores of the games versus Lee's Summit Schools. Say Class 5 Sched, when LSW won it all. K, barely beat FO on a questionable call at FO and was turbo-clocked out of the stadium vs LSW. A team they played well in the first half, but soon found out that faster kid's run faster than slower kid's.
In 2013-14 they gave up 77 to Lee's Summit and 42 to LSW. Beat LN by one point. Beat a down Staley team 2 times that season. One by blowout, the other by 21. Shall I go on?
Ok...In 2012-2013 6-3 reg season losses to Ray South, Staley PC, Beat LN by 4, Beat Tonka in 2 OT's Lost to Staley, and Park Hill South in C5 playoffs.
Kearney is good. A well coached great program. Look at their success in C5. How can any rational person not see this. Buffoon's can't see the fallacy of their reasoning. Kearney is no Webb.

I'll grant you Lee's Summit West. Without Harrison, the game is a dead heat two years ago. But no one else:
1. Staley 3-6. (Kearney 264 PF v. 101 PA.) Not enough football talent to hang. Slow and weaker than Kearney.
2. Park Hill 0-2 (Kearney 70 PF - 28. PA) Butt kicking both times.
3. Fort 1-2 (Kearney 37-29.) You obviously were not at the game you mentioned. They did not win it on a questionable call. Fort would have had maybe one or two more chances to try to score with less than 30 seconds left, but they were still behind. Fort Lost--quit making excuses for them. Kearney has a 2-1 record on them. What does Webb have to do with anything? Nothing about your comments touched on that...I am talking about your idiotic idea that Kearney couldn't beat KC's class 5 teams..the ones they have beaten and dominated over the years.
 
Last edited:
I'll grant you Lee's Summit West. Without Harrison, the game is a dead heat two years ago. But no one else:
1. Staley 3-6. (Kearney 264 PF v. 101 PA.) Not enough football talent to hang. Slow and weaker than Kearney.
2. Park Hill 0-2 (Kearney 70 PF - 28. PA) Butt kicking both times.
3. Fort 1-2 (Kearney 37-29.) You obviously were not at the game you mentioned. They did not win it on a questionable call. Fort would have had maybe one or two more chances to try to score with less than 30 seconds left, but they were still behind. Fort Lost--quit making excuses for them. Kearney has a 2-1 record on them.
Whatevah. Kearney is Kearney this year, ho hum.
 
I'll grant you Lee's Summit West. Without Harrison, the game is a dead heat two years ago. But no one else:
1. Staley 3-6. (Kearney 264 PF v. 101 PA.) Not enough football talent to hang. Slow and weaker than Kearney.
2. Park Hill 0-2 (Kearney 70 PF - 28. PA) Butt kicking both times.
3. Fort 1-2 (Kearney 37-29.) You obviously were not at the game you mentioned. They did not win it on a questionable call. Fort would have had maybe one or two more chances to try to score with less than 30 seconds left, but they were still behind. Fort Lost--quit making excuses for them. Kearney has a 2-1 record on them. What does Webb have to do with anything? Nothing about your comments touched on that...I am talking about your idiotic idea that Kearney couldn't beat KC's class 5 teams..the ones they have beaten and dominated over the years.
UH well PH was in the poop bowl and was on a gazzillion game losing streak. Staley was a NEW SCHOOL you idiot though they rose quickly Kearney has been playing FB a thousand years longer.
Any Fort victories are super impressive.
 
UH well PH was in the poop bowl and was on a gazzillion game losing streak. Staley was a NEW SCHOOL you idiot though they rose quickly Kearney has been playing FB a thousand years longer.
Any Fort victories are super impressive.
So I guess Battle is ho-hum? Hannibal that beat battle is ho-hum, and undefeated Westminster is ho-hum? LOL...you are a clown.
 
Just spit balling here. What is their rate the past 5-10 with teams in SWMO?
last 5 years 0-1..... 10 years 1-2 '09 won it all good job. So 1-3. Ball just must be tougher down south?? This is fun.
 
I guess I missed something O-line?? No just fighting through a Friday. Trying to have some fun with the KC boys, Ready for the Semi. this Saturday. You all are just fighting for 2nd place. an I'm not even a Webbie. Just know good football and coaching when I see it.
 
Just spit balling here. What is their rate the past 5-10 with teams in SWMO?
last 5 years 0-1..... 10 years 1-2 '09 won it all good job. So 1-3. Ball just must be tougher down south?? This is fun.
Just spitballing back...why not go back 15 years? Why stop at 10? Oh, Kearney is 3-2 against Webb since 2000..this IS FUN. I guess your theory doesn't work.
 
So I guess Battle is ho-hum? Hannibal that beat battle is ho-hum, and undefeated Westminster is ho-hum? LOL...you are a clown.
You posted Plenty of 4A teams can beat Kearney. YES. YES, the C4 teams can beat K. And furthermore you have written Kearney could win C5. NO, NO, they wouldn't, not this year, and the record in the C5 playoffs proves my point. Buffy you're an ass clown with pea brain that scare's little kid's at your circus act of not knowing what you're talking about. For the love of our maker, grow a brain!
 
Last edited:
I guess I missed something O-line?? No just fighting through a Friday. Trying to have some fun with the KC boys, Ready for the Semi. this Saturday. You all are just fighting for 2nd place. an I'm not even a Webbie. Just know good football and coaching when I see it.
No, I was talking about Blizz and Joey. You've got the most valid point here. Who cares what Kearney would do in Class 5 this year
 
Just spitballing back...why not go back 15 years? Why stop at 10? Oh, Kearney is 3-2 against Webb since 2000..this IS FUN. I guess your theory doesn't work.
Yes, Battle is average. Yes Hannibal evidently is not good. Yes, IDK about Westmin. No clue. I hope Kearney wins.
If KHS beats Webb, Webb has fallen, period. Not for all time, but in 2015.
The greatest single season team State Champ was a Kearney team. They turbo-clocked every opponent from game one to SCGame with 40ish guys. Who cares, those guys are all in there 30's. Jones was still somewhere in between PHS and Arkansas. Irrelevant because it was a long time ago[/
 
Last edited:
BlizzTARD...again, they dropped the "A" off the classifications years ago. 4A and 5A don't exist anymore. Someone has to help keep you from looking like a moron.

Tell you what...IF Kearney doesn';t win by 28 or more tomorrow...then you might have a shred of credibility...if they win by Turboclock....you are a bigger blizz TARD than you will ever acknowledge.
 
Yes, Battle is average. Yes Hannibal evidently is not good. Yes, IDK about Westmin. No clue. I hope Kearney wins.
If KHS beats Webb, Webb has fallen, period. Not for all time, but in 2015.
The greatest single season team State Champ was a Kearney team. They turbo-clocked every opponent from game one to SCGame with 40ish guys. Who cares, those guys are all in there 30's. Jones was still somewhere in between PHS and Arkansas. Irrelevant because it was a long time ago[/
BlizzTARD...again, they dropped the "A" off the classifications years ago. 4A and 5A don't exist anymore. Someone has to help keep you from looking like a moron.

Tell you what...IF Kearney doesn';t win by 28 or more tomorrow...then you might have a shred of credibility...if they win by Turboclock....you are a bigger blizz TARD than you will ever acknowledge.
Are you two meeting up to listen/watch the Battle game tonight!?!?!? I had suggested in an earlier thread a pizza joint or coffee shop.......
 
Are you two meeting up to listen/watch the Battle game tonight!?!?!? I had suggested in an earlier thread a pizza joint or coffee shop.......
I'll be in my mom's basement eating pork rids and listening on my 2005 Dell XP computer...doing laundry and watching a re-run of M.A.S.H.
 
Just spitballing back...why not go back 15 years? Why stop at 10? Oh, Kearney is 3-2 against Webb since 2000..this IS FUN. I guess your theory doesn't work.


Although true its kinda funny. So Kearney has made it that far 5 times since 2000 thats precious. WEBB in that same time span has been that far 13 times with 9 rings! Please dont compare...
 
Although true its kinda funny. So Kearney has made it that far 5 times since 2000 thats precious. WEBB in that same time span has been that far 13 times with 9 rings! Please dont compare...
You did get that I was saying his logic was flawed right? Where did I compare them? Let me explain...he cherry picked games to show that teams from the SW are better. So I cherry picked a timeframe too...and in that time span Kearney beat Webb, at Webb, three times. LOL Good for them. Three rings.
 
Last edited:
So I guess Battle is ho-hum? Hannibal that beat battle is ho-hum, and undefeated Westminster is ho-hum? LOL...you are a clown.
Hannibal is awesome. Fort up 35/6 at half over Battle. Battle scores on TD on a long run, great play...the other on a prayer that Fort tipped to a lucky rec.
 
Last edited:
Are you two meeting up to listen/watch the Battle game tonight!?!?!? I had suggested in an earlier thread a pizza joint or coffee shop.......
images

Buffy, I know it's hard to believe but you are wrong.
 
Yay! Fort got their third turbo clock win of the year...but wait, it was against a team that lost to Ho hum Hannibal. I suppose we need to put an asterisk by this win. *Against a bad team that lost to a bad Class 4 team?
Hannibal played the weakest schedule. HANNIBAL BEAT BATTLE BY 7 POINT'S DUFUS
What a bad undefeated team. Hannibal would not win the MRVC, Odessa and Oak Grove are better, Lexington and Higginsville would hang tough, Maryville would beat them and Harrisonville would slap them silly.
 
Last edited:
How bad will Kearney turbo clock Westminster? Will Kearney finally play a team that will fight back? In the semi's? You'd think Kearney is the second coming of the 85 bears.
 
Joey "NOT IMPRESSED BY FORT" Northlando...
I was not impressed with Battles easy road last year. Guess their string of playing bad teams in the playoffs showed up against Fort. I mean how does this team make it to the Semi's?
There's 5 teams in the Northland that would beat Battle.
 
Last edited:
I'll grant you Lee's Summit West. Without Harrison, the game is a dead heat two years ago. But no one else:
1. Staley 3-6. (Kearney 264 PF v. 101 PA.) Not enough football talent to hang. Slow and weaker than Kearney.
2. Park Hill 0-2 (Kearney 70 PF - 28. PA) Butt kicking both times.
3. Fort 1-2 (Kearney 37-29.) You obviously were not at the game you mentioned. They did not win it on a questionable call. Fort would have had maybe one or two more chances to try to score with less than 30 seconds left, but they were still behind. Fort Lost--quit making excuses for them. Kearney has a 2-1 record on them. What does Webb have to do with anything? Nothing about your comments touched on that...I am talking about your idiotic idea that Kearney couldn't beat KC's class 5 teams..the ones they have beaten and dominated over the years.
I was at that Fort Kearney game 2 yrs ago and I remember their stud rb Ezra Vaoifi was hurt, causing them to totally change their game. Depending on Skylar T as a sophomore (who held his own). Anyway, that Fort team is not as good as their squad this yr. Sima Thompson would give ANY O-line in the state a hard time. Jonah Tuimaseve probably the most underrated player on that defense, actually played snaps as a freshman against Kirkwood in their trip to the dome in '12 (loss). Sorry got long winded, but my point is you can never compare past records to this yr. lol Having said all that, Kearney is playing great ball and hopefully they take down Class 4 Goliath at the dome. Also hope Fort and BS South take the trophies home in their respective classes.
 
I'll grant you Lee's Summit West. Without Harrison, the game is a dead heat two years ago. But no one else:
1. Staley 3-6. (Kearney 264 PF v. 101 PA.) Not enough football talent to hang. Slow and weaker than Kearney.
2. Park Hill 0-2 (Kearney 70 PF - 28. PA) Butt kicking both times.
3. Fort 1-2 (Kearney 37-29.) You obviously were not at the game you mentioned. They did not win it on a questionable call. Fort would have had maybe one or two more chances to try to score with less than 30 seconds left, but they were still behind. Fort Lost--quit making excuses for them. Kearney has a 2-1 record on them. What does Webb have to do with anything? Nothing about your comments touched on that...I am talking about your idiotic idea that Kearney couldn't beat KC's class 5 teams..the ones they have beaten and dominated over the years.
PH-111909999.jpg&Maxw=583

Because this isn't a "questionable call?" I doubt you were there at this game. Although, this doesn't matter now as Fort Osage deserves where they're at now in the 2015 Class 5 State Championship. Kearney is also going to the dome this year, but don't be surprised when you refresh twitter to see 30-0 Webb City at halftime.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT