ADVERTISEMENT

Promises kept, baby.

Dont sweat it Veer. Miller and Diaper Dan arent just internet tough guys. They are bagel store tough guys in striped polo shirts also.

 
Some of the others I can go with you, but is it immoral for a person or company to be worth billions, well that is a loaded question and depends on how they got that billions and what do they do with it once they have it? Amazon is a good example. They are the driving force behind wanting to raise minimum wage. So let's say they are successful in lobby the government to raise minimum wage They have the power they have the clout and the certainly have the money! By doing that they are forcing the local mom and pop stores out most cannot pay that, especially in small towns like yours and mine. Thus driving more customers to their business model. Using that power money for their own personal gain I would say is immoral. So I think it depends on how you use your money you could certainly do immoral things with your billions.
Of course what people do can be immoral and it doesn't take billions for that. Libs say it is immoral for someone to have so more than most do and it must be stopped.
 
What does the bible tell us?

Ill say no but ill let you biblical scholars pick and choose which of God's laws to follow as usual
Congrats on answering a question....sort of. And you are correct the Bible is the authority on matters of morality.
The Bible says what we do determines morality not what we have.
 
I like how you invoke the Bible but offer no specific verses.
Oh, he can use specific verses. He thinks he's gotcha all the time by pulling one verse out of context and applying it to places it isn't applicable. That is the purpose of his question to me.
We've done this many times and when he gets shown his foolishness he not only won't answer the questions, he quits posting for months hoping everyone forgot.
 
Of course what people do can be immoral and it doesn't take billions for that. Libs say it is immoral for someone to have so more than most do and it must be stopped.

Very true, so companies and CEO's need to be mindful of that, especially in their actions when chasing profit. I think right now we have many corporations chasing more and more profit and the top dogs are taking more of that profit and leaving the workers out. I think you would agree with that also. Look at what big pharmacy companies do to Americas versus the rest of the countries in Drug prices. That is because other countries see that they are chasing profit and put limits on what they can charge customers. I don't think it is wrong to threaten companies or those who run the companies with higher taxes if you don't start acting right.
 
Very true, so companies and CEO's need to be mindful of that, especially in their actions when chasing profit. I think right now we have many corporations chasing more and more profit and the top dogs are taking more of that profit and leaving the workers out. I think you would agree with that also. Look at what big pharmacy companies do to Americas versus the rest of the countries in Drug prices. That is because other countries see that they are chasing profit and put limits on what they can charge customers. I don't think it is wrong to threaten companies or those who run the companies with higher taxes if you don't start acting right.
I don't see any proposals based on actions though. Every liberal is saying having is all that's required.
 
Typical Veer. Avoid, distract, and insult.
When the Bible says women are to keep silent, how does that apply to men?
Who was the Levitical law given to according to scripture)?
What was its purpose (according to scripture)?
Was it replaced (according to scripture)?
I know you won't answer these questions just like every other time. If you don't know what you speak of, there is a way to avoid looking foolish, maybe you should consider it.
 
Typical Veer. Avoid, distract, and insult.
When the Bible says women are to keep silent, how does that apply to men?
Who was the Levitical law given to according to scripture)?
What was its purpose (according to scripture)?
Was it replaced (according to scripture)?
I know you won't answer these questions just like every other time. If you don't know what you speak of, there is a way to avoid looking foolish, maybe you should consider it.
Its in the bible.
You pick and choose what to follow.
Excuses.
Speaking of looking foolish...keep talking about the economy
 
  • Like
Reactions: HomeyR
Its in the bible.
You pick and choose what to follow.
Excuses.

Yes, it's in the Bible, so how does a man apply something written to women? If you want to discuss the passage fine, but it CAN'T be applied to men.
Answer the questions.....no of course. You always run and hide.
Veer has no substantial opinions other than everyone except him is stupid (wait, that isn't substantial either). My point is proven by you EVERY time.
 
Typical Veer. Avoid, distract, and insult.
When the Bible says women are to keep silent, how does that apply to men?
Who was the Levitical law given to according to scripture)?
What was its purpose (according to scripture)?
Was it replaced (according to scripture)?
I know you won't answer these questions just like every other time. If you don't know what you speak of, there is a way to avoid looking foolish, maybe you should consider it.
I guess Veer doesn't post on Saturdays or he would surely have answered all these because "Veer doesn't run".
 
Yes, it's in the Bible, so how does a man apply something written to women? If you want to discuss the passage fine, but it CAN'T be applied to men.
Answer the questions.....no of course. You always run and hide.
Veer has no substantial opinions other than everyone except him is stupid (wait, that isn't substantial either). My point is proven by you EVERY time.
I guess Veer must be pretty busy looking up answers since he NEVER avoids/runs/hides from questions.
 
I guess Veer must be pretty busy looking up answers since he NEVER avoids/runs/hides from questions.
You have vdr and me educating you isnt going to fix it.
Its in the bible so its God's word no matter what excuses you make for it.
 
I don't see any proposals based on actions though. Every liberal is saying having is all that's required.

I don't know what the answer it, but I think more of a tax code that leans towards giving cuts based on employee wages, like do they pay a fair and living wage versus what the CEO is paid. If a CEO is paid $86 million and their average working is making $18,000 and needs food stamps to get by... then yeah they need to pay for that thru extra taxes. If your CEO makes $86 million but your average working is making $58,000 a year then you should get a tax break based on paying a fair wage. And that wage needs to take into account foreign wages, They need to pay those people a good wage.
 
I don't know what the answer it, but I think more of a tax code that leans towards giving cuts based on employee wages, like do they pay a fair and living wage versus what the CEO is paid. If a CEO is paid $86 million and their average working is making $18,000 and needs food stamps to get by... then yeah they need to pay for that thru extra taxes. If your CEO makes $86 million but your average working is making $58,000 a year then you should get a tax break based on paying a fair wage. And that wage needs to take into account foreign wages, They need to pay those people a good wage.
What CEO of a major company 'only' makes makes 86 million these days?
 
I don't know what the answer it, but I think more of a tax code that leans towards giving cuts based on employee wages, like do they pay a fair and living wage versus what the CEO is paid. If a CEO is paid $86 million and their average working is making $18,000 and needs food stamps to get by... then yeah they need to pay for that thru extra taxes. If your CEO makes $86 million but your average working is making $58,000 a year then you should get a tax break based on paying a fair wage. And that wage needs to take into account foreign wages, They need to pay those people a good wage.

There should be a WAR for CEOs like there is for baseball. Wins above replacement. If there is absolutely no other human being in the world who could perform to help their company make billions, then you get $86 mil a year. If there is, then you dont get near that.
 
There should be a WAR for CEOs like there is for baseball. Wins above replacement. If there is absolutely no other human being in the world who could perform to help their company make billions, then you get $86 mil a year. If there is, then you dont get near that.

Yes I'm sure what the world needs is the financial advise of a socialist ex-PE teacher...
 
What verse?
He pulls verses out of the Levitical law that was given to a certain people for a certain purpose for a certain time frame and wants to know why we ignore "Gods words" by not following it.
He claims to be a Christian but doesn't like to be told what the Bible says.
 
He pulls verses out of the Levitical law that was given to a certain people for a certain purpose for a certain time frame and wants to know why we ignore "Gods words" by not following it.
He claims to be a Christian but doesn't like to be told what the Bible says.

I just wanted to know what specific verses he was pointing to. He just keeps saying "well the Bible says", but won't say specifically what verse to back up his assertion.
 
He pulls verses out of the Levitical law that was given to a certain people for a certain purpose for a certain time frame and wants to know why we ignore "Gods words" by not following it.
He claims to be a Christian but doesn't like to be told what the Bible says.
Id try to explain it to you but its like trying to teach RPO to 2nd graders.
Bless your heart
 
Dodge because you're wrong. If you were half as smart as you think you are it would be nothing to explain and prove your point.
This has played out multiple times on here. He can't answer the questions but he always brings it up. It's like he can't remember how foolish he looked last time. At least this time he didn't just disappear but he is still dodging, ducking, avoiding, and trying to claim superiority which probably just makes him look worse than disappearing.
 
There should be a WAR for CEOs like there is for baseball. Wins above replacement. If there is absolutely no other human being in the world who could perform to help their company make billions, then you get $86 mil a year. If there is, then you dont get near that.

What is funny we recycle CEO's like the NFL does football coaches or Baseball does Managers. Just like an NFL or Baseball team a company is only as good as the talent it assembles. The better the talent the better odds that the coach can win, just like the CEO of a company the better employee's and product they create they too increase the odds that the company will be successful. So that wealth should be spread out better than it is today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duck_walk
Id try to explain it to you but its like trying to teach RPO to 2nd graders.
Bless your heart
Who was the Levitical law given to according to scripture)?
What was its purpose (according to scripture)?
Was it replaced (according to scripture)?
I know you won't answer these questions just like every other time. If you don't know what you speak of, there is a way to avoid looking foolish, maybe you should consider it.

Let me show the answers and you can explain why i'm wrong (I know you won't again).
Galatians chapter 2:
15 “We are the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, so that we may be justified by the Law; since the Law no flesh will be justified.17 But if, while seeking to be justified in Christ, we ourselves have also been found the Law I the Law, so that I might live to God.20 I have been the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Law, then Christ died needlessly.”

Galatians chapter 3:
23 But before faith came,we were kept in custody under the law, being shut up to the faith which was later to be revealed. 24 Therefore the law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith. 25 But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor.

Those are just a couple of the many passages IN SCRIPTURE that say we are no longer to follow the law. Do I need to explain further since I can post MANY more?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT