Your assuming that every school in the state doesn't want to play private schools. Your assuming the existing system is not fair, and this will make the new system fair. Your assuming that private schools want to exclusively play private schools, and based on subjective opinion, with no guarantee that this is backed up by empirical data, that this would be a feasible alternative. What about private school's that struggle to field a football team does this improve their situation? What about the kids that want to compete against public school kids? Are the private school participants across the board physically better than a public school kid or just 9? If not, what's the number? 5?A couple of simple solutions...no transfer rules period for any school public or private MSHSAA get's out of that business just let kids go where they want anytime the want. Or just let Private schools fund and run their own Sports organization and leave MSHSAA and then MSHSAA could focus resources on finding cheater among the public schools.
Are kids truly being damaged by losing a football game? Lets get real. Niether one of us is playing. Have you asked every high school football player if they'd prefer to not play Trinity? Is this an important question or is it up to God's of fairness and equality to decide what's best? It's just not that important to kick out an segment of the population because football equality is the overall aim. Ridiculous.
Last edited: