Like veer says, typical liberal who only cares if money is spent on their priorities.Last I checked, Missouri wasn't supporting abortions, LGBT or weed with my tax dollars.
Like veer says, typical liberal who only cares if money is spent on their priorities.Last I checked, Missouri wasn't supporting abortions, LGBT or weed with my tax dollars.
there has never been a material society that didn't have some sort of taxation. Societies require order that can only be achieved through a shared social system. That system has a cost.Not that the year is that important. Just so I don't get called out on a technicality youngster, at some point in history, the government decided to make it legal to steal my money. That should cover it.
The cost is to high .
I now support my "State Government" which we the people still have control over.
nonsense, the people have control over bothThe cost is to high .
I now support my "State Government" which we the people still have control over.
not totally true, think of the reason Medicaid expansion isn't the law of the land everywhere, they can't compel states to do whatever they want when the states have clearly delineated powersFederal law is still Law of the Land. You can support state and local all you want, end of the day if the federal government says "Jump" through legislation, the states have to say "How high, sir."
Fact.
not totally true, think of the reason Medicaid expansion isn't the law of the land everywhere, they can't compel states to do whatever they want when the states have clearly delineated powers