A lot of interesting stuff on there.
Not sure how these meetings go, does the name by it mean that is the Coach that talks about it or initiates it? It seems like Coach Naeger is talking about the private schools issues. Not trying to be vicious, but genuinely trying to learn about these.I mean the fact that the private school stuff is at least being discussed is a step in the right direction I suppose. But surely this isn't the first time it has been discussed and not much has been accomplished.
I believe it means that is the person who has got it put on the agenda to be discussed.Not sure how these meetings go, does the name by it mean that is the Coach that talks about it or initiates it? It seems like Coach Naeger is talking about the private schools issues. Not trying to be vicious, but genuinely trying to learn about these.
I think out-of-state students need to be enrolled at the school at 9th grade. All other out-of-state students need to relocate physically to Missouri. There should be zero gray area. Live in Kansas and want to transfer your student to Rockhurst in their junior year? Too bad unless you physically move to Missouri and within the 25-mile radiusFew thoughts:
• ban cowbells those things hurt my ears GDMIT
• out of state need permanent address in district
• film video all schools post games within 48 hrs to hudl. Helps kids and encourages fair play
• field condition expectation
• Private school cap removal asap. Effective March 2025 based on rules
I think he has thrown out several proposals trying to get 1 or more. The problem is I think some of them will need to apply across the board and not just to footballWonder what elimination of private schools from classifications means?
Remove all privates. Break into even classes. Class 1 schools shouldn't have a 1 in 32 chance while 2-5 have a 1 in 56 chance that's asinine. Even classes will cut some traffic down.I like the cap @ 32 on class 1 but make it public schools only.
Remove all privates. Break into even classes. Class 1 schools shouldn't have a 1 in 32 chance while 2-5 have a 1 in 56 chance that's asinine. Even classes will cut some traffic down.
No we wouldn't because you have not seen my plan. As I have not put one out separating them. I've only put out equal classes and it didn't exceed 2.0The top 10% of public schools win championships at a high rate than private schools do. Should we kick them out too?
Class one should be capped at the 2.0 ratio. If we follow you plan class one would have schools ranging from like 90 to 240.
Mshsaa isn’t staying at 6 classes if it separates public and private schools.No we wouldn't because you have not seen my plan. As I have not put one out separating them. I've only put out equal classes and it didn't exceed 2.0
It's on this board if you wanna read em.
You will see the plan for that next week.Mshsaa isn’t staying at 6 classes if it separates public and private schools.
Yours or the board? I don’t see football separating publics and privates. It will have to be Mshsaa wide.You will see the plan for that next week.
I will put forward my idea next week but also next week mshsaa will attempt to hear the idea as wellYours or the board? I don’t see football separating publics and privates. It will have to be Mshsaa wide.
That would be a 150!The top 10% of public schools win championships at a high rate than private schools do. Should we kick them out too?
Class one should be capped at the 2.0 ratio. If we follow you plan class one would have schools ranging from like 90 to 240.
There is no good team running 2-7My thoughts
Pros
• separate of Private and public be a good thing
• dropping to 5 classes for public if this does go through
Cons
• Class 1 shouldn’t be 32 I say 42, or 48
. If Class 1 does go to 32. What will the new Class 5 was 6 look like. The enrollment difference in Class 6 this year is already spread out from 1278-1762. I say 32 in supposedly the new C5 and Split C1 to C4 Evenly and evenly divided C1-C5 Public Schools.
• don’t like the ideal of taking the top 4 schools in each district. What if we get another C3 D3 next year if they do vote this in and some good teams left out of the bracket!!!
5 and 2 would be great.Mshsaa isn’t staying at 6 classes if it separates public and private schools.
They need to play better. If you don't finish in the top 4 of 8 during the regular season do you DESERVE to be in?• don’t like the ideal of taking the top 4 schools in each district. What if we get another C3 D3 next year if they do vote this in and some good teams left out of the bracket!!!
Not sure how these meetings go, does the name by it mean that is the Coach that talks about it or initiates it? It seems like Coach Naeger is talking about the private schools issues. Not trying to be vicious, but genuinely trying to learn about these.
Are there more than one coach in Missouri named Naeger? Probably not…. So probably yes!If that’s the head coach at Valle, what could he possibly have to say? Is this going to be a “Valle isn’t like the other private schools, so we shouldn’t be punished like them” speech? I’m not saying it will be, but that seems to be the rag we’ve heard on here so I’m just curious.
2. You can attend an out-of-district public school and pay the tuition already. Some districts like Springfield and St. Joseph have "open enrollment" already.1. Separate public and private. We had the chance to do this in the early 2000s and for some reason that’s still not clear, the coaches’ association voted it down. Let’s not make the same mistake again.
2. Make the enrollment radius the same for public and privates. If privates can draw from a max of 30 miles, publics should, too. If a kid in Ashland or Fulton wants to attend Blair Oaks, fine. His family shouldn’t have to go through a charade of owning land in the BO district or some such BS when any kid whose family can afford it can go to Helias - don’t even have to be Catholic.
I will put forward my idea next week but also next week mshsaa will attempt to hear the idea as well