ADVERTISEMENT

Trump grounded

If the standard is Trump or X, the answer is nearly always X.
It's funny watching them carry signs saying "Love Trumps Hate" and then fawning over "comedians" who cut the heads off of paper mache' effigies of Donald Trump, call his wife a prostitute, and his son mentally-challenged. Then they run around the streets like wild animals, burning people's cars, beating up Trump voters, and smashing store windows. Ghenghis Kahn and the Golden Horde could take lessens in barbarism from these people who think of themselves as elitists. The only thing they are elite in is in cruel intolerance. I am sure they'd join the Jihadists in cutting a real person's head off if they weren't afraid of going to jail.

Yes, indeed, what a great group of "I'm a lover" people are these Democrats. They are exactly the brain-dead, hate-filled lunatics that our Founders wrote the Constitution to protect civilized people from.
 
It's funny watching them carry signs saying "Love Trumps Hate" and then fawning over "comedians" who cut the heads off of paper mache' effigies of Donald Trump, call his wife a prostitute, and his son mentally-challenged. Then they run around the streets like wild animals, burning people's cars, beating up Trump voters, and smashing store windows. Ghenghis Kahn and the Golden Horde could take lessens in barbarism from these people who think of themselves as elitists. The only thing they are elite in is in cruel intolerance. I am sure they'd join the Jihadists in cutting a real person's head off if they weren't afraid of going to jail.

Yes, indeed, what a great group of "I'm a lover" people are these Democrats. They are exactly the brain-dead, hate-filled lunatics that our Founders wrote the Constitution to protect civilized people from.
Did you block out the entire Trump campaign and his rallies?

I'm not going to deny the tone from some is bad, and some things are beyond the pale, but Trump is a vulgar, indecent, combustible man who condoned violence.

You have no moral high ground to defend here. You gave that up when you nominated and voted for him.
 
Contrast Trump's action to the great Liberal Muslim Mayor of London, who says that terrorism is "a normal part of big city life just like hailing a cab," and has therefore made the Muslim bloodbath in England a self-fulfilling prophesy. Would even any of you crazy Libs want THAT guy as your President instead of Trump?
To answer your question yes I would prefer him and the fact that he is Muslim should not be so problematic to you, but it does help me understand where you are coming from.
 
It's funny watching them carry signs saying "Love Trumps Hate" and then fawning over "comedians" who cut the heads off of paper mache' effigies of Donald Trump, call his wife a prostitute, and his son mentally-challenged. Then they run around the streets like wild animals, burning people's cars, beating up Trump voters, and smashing store windows. Ghenghis Kahn and the Golden Horde could take lessens in barbarism from these people who think of themselves as elitists. The only thing they are elite in is in cruel intolerance. I am sure they'd join the Jihadists in cutting a real person's head off if they weren't afraid of going to jail.

Yes, indeed, what a great group of "I'm a lover" people are these Democrats. They are exactly the brain-dead, hate-filled lunatics that our Founders wrote the Constitution to protect civilized people from.
Your words seem rather hate filled, but carry on much like the so called President you make your own case for us hateful Dems.
 
To answer your question yes I would prefer him and the fact that he is Muslim should not be so problematic to you, but it does help me understand where you are coming from.
Khan's comments were a bit absurd although it's ridiculous for the President of the US to basically tell people to panic about terrorism. Governments are supposed to get things back to normal when this stuff happens.
 
Did you block out the entire Trump campaign and his rallies?

I'm not going to deny the tone from some is bad, and some things are beyond the pale, but Trump is a vulgar, indecent, combustible man who condoned violence.

You have no moral high ground to defend here. You gave that up when you nominated and voted for him.
I think
Khan's comments were a bit absurd although it's ridiculous for the President of the US to basically tell people to panic about terrorism. Governments are supposed to get things back to normal when this stuff happens.
Agreed, but I would take him over Trump every single time.
 
Nope the workplace is apolitical. Make sure they are the following: dependable, hard working and (you will really hate this one) morally grounded. Folks like that succeed.
tofat I hate seeing you become a punk. Totally unnecessary comment about what I hate. You were the one moaning about being someone who has hired many of them and can tell most act as though their "hard" work is over and we should just give them a paycheck. My comment do a better job hiring and (you will really hate this one) selecting morally grounded people. Makes no sense that you complain about being a screw up when it comes to hiring, and continue doing it.?????
 
Did you block out the entire Trump campaign and his rallies?

I'm not going to deny the tone from some is bad, and some things are beyond the pale, but Trump is a vulgar, indecent, combustible man who condoned violence.

You have no moral high ground to defend here. You gave that up when you nominated and voted for him.

Does Trump and his supporters go around chanting LOVE trumps hate? That was the point of his post nolt that Trump was the king of love.
 
I think

Agreed, but I would take him over Trump every single time.
There's no info about Trump planning to go to London. In fact, he postponed an earlier planned visit until October at the earliest, because he felt that Britain was not a safe place to visit. And, as usual, he was right.
 
There's no info about Trump planning to go to London. In fact, he postponed an earlier planned visit until October at the earliest, because he felt that Britain was not a safe place to visit. And, as usual, he was right.
If you believe this, you are really, really gullible.

He was in Britain during the campaign in 2016. He was in Brussels less than two weeks ago. Etc.

The President has not skipped London because it is unsafe for him. Give me a break.
 
There's also a decent chance Trump's visit is outside of London to avoid protestors - this is a more realistic concern than terror. Trump showing up in London, Paris, Berlin is an invitation for massive protests.
 
If you believe this, you are really, really gullible.

He was in Britain during the campaign in 2016. He was in Brussels less than two weeks ago. Etc.

The President has not skipped London because it is unsafe for him. Give me a break.

And you know Trumps reasoning?
 
And you know Trumps reasoning?
You should be asking that question to Ohio who seems to know the facts. Neuty is just citing some different scenario's Please follow along. Ohio claims fact and Neuty says there is a chance:eek::confused::eek::confused:
 
And you know Trumps reasoning?
The claim is absurd. Trump just went to the hotbed of European jihad in Brussels. The idea that he skipped London for that reason is just silly.

Absurd claims demand evidence from those making them, not from the other side.

I have no idea what the exact reason is why the US/UK state visit is later this year, but the idea that he skipped London because of terror is just absurd.

What about October makes London (which remains on the October itinerary according to all available reporting) suddenly safe then? Why is he scheduled to go to Manila later this year when the Philippines has a viable Muslim insurgency?

the claim is ridiculous.
 
For example, it would be more believable (but still not proven in any way) to say the US would have preferred to combine the state visit with his trip to the Middle East and Europe but PM May didn't want a state visit from the extraordinarily unpopular US President right before the general election on June 8.
 
So in other words, you have no idea. It is your opinion. But never let a chance go to waste to insult someone with a different opinion. Got it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ohioreturns
So in other words, you have no idea. It is your opinion. But never let a chance go to waste to insult someone with a different opinion. Got it.
He didn't state it as an opinion. Read the post.

One can have no idea of the real reason but still gauge that a presented option is very likely to be wrong. Not all options are reasonable. That one was preposterous. Believing that one is a sign that someone needs to start thinking more critically and start reading better news sources that wouldn't promote that sort of idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ohioreturns
So in other words, you have no idea. It is your opinion. But never let a chance go to waste to insult someone with a different opinion. Got it.
Further, not all opinions are created equally, and no one on this board should pretend they are. Some ideas are clearly wrong and deserve to be dismissed from the discussion absent evidence that gives them some sort of credibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Expect2Win
And you know Trumps reasoning?
Answer a simple question: why is it ok for him to go to Britain in 2016, Brussels in May 2017, and London in the fall but miraculously not now? Especially when a state visit would have been scheduled and planned well in advance.
 
Maybe the President of the United States of America has better intelligence than you?

The fact that you responded three times to my post says something.

Keep trying to convince yourself and others.

Night
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ohioreturns
Maybe the President of the United States of America has better intelligence than you?

The fact that you responded three times to my post says something.

Keep trying to convince yourself and others.

Night
You keep acting like you are talking in facts when clearly you are not. Alternative facts do not count Kelly Anne eags
 
Maybe the President of the United States of America has better intelligence than you?

The fact that you responded three times to my post says something.

Keep trying to convince yourself and others.

Night
Yes, he does, but he lies about everything to where the average person can't trust him when he says this sort of thing (which I'm not sure that he did - can you find a link to where he said this?)

The claim remains preposterous.
 
No. My position is that the Dems are claiming to be better while the facts show they are anything but.
Right now, in the US, the Dems are the better party at this, in spite of some bad actors. Some people are definitely losing their heads, though.
 
There's also a decent chance Trump's visit is outside of London to avoid protestors - this is a more realistic concern than terror. Trump showing up in London, Paris, Berlin is an invitation for massive protests.
Thanks for proving my point. Safety is not that complicated to understand.
 
Right now, in the US, the Dems are the better party at this, in spite of some bad actors. Some people are definitely losing their heads, though.
The Dems are definitely losing their heads, good for nothing is the accurate term.
The government's "Justice" Department is total joke. And being a government bureaucracy means it's a 98% Democratic Party "Justice" Department. It's the "Justice" Department that does everything possible to invent negative stories about Trump and then leak them anonymously and illegally to the press.
Trump has no reason to respect those people. Comey didn't respect them either. He had to go public with the knowledge that Ms. Clinton was under investigation by the FBI for stealing classified State Department documents, because he knew that Obama's "Justice" Department would suppress the prosecution. Comey knew the DOJ was corrupt. He called them out on it, and in the process sent Ms. Clinton packing.
So don't blame Trump. Blame Comey. Or, you can put the blame where it belongs, on a corrupt DOJ filled to the brim with Democrat political hacks. Trump has rooted Sally Yates out of there, but there are a lot more that need rooting. That will take time.
 
The Dems are definitely losing their heads, good for nothing is the accurate term.
The government's "Justice" Department is total joke. And being a government bureaucracy means it's a 98% Democratic Party "Justice" Department. It's the "Justice" Department that does everything possible to invent negative stories about Trump and then leak them anonymously and illegally to the press.
Trump has no reason to respect those people. Comey didn't respect them either. He had to go public with the knowledge that Ms. Clinton was under investigation by the FBI for stealing classified State Department documents, because he knew that Obama's "Justice" Department would suppress the prosecution. Comey knew the DOJ was corrupt. He called them out on it, and in the process sent Ms. Clinton packing.
So don't blame Trump. Blame Comey. Or, you can put the blame where it belongs, on a corrupt DOJ filled to the brim with Democrat political hacks. Trump has rooted Sally Yates out of there, but there are a lot more that need rooting. That will take time.
Yes 3.5 years to get rid of the minority party of Trump. OOps my bad according to Mitch McConnell only 2.5 because your last year doesn't count
 
Yes 3.5 years to get rid of the minority party of Trump. OOps my bad according to Mitch McConnell only 2.5 because your last year doesn't count
Could you not equate bad government in years? 8 years you held the big cheese. You guys suck at life. Returning to neutrality now. Lol
 
Could you not equate bad government in years? 8 years you held the big cheese. You guys suck at life. Returning to neutrality now. Lol
Instead of fighting ISIS, fixing Obamacare, cutting taxes, or even funding highways....
Instead of NSA abuses, Un-Masking, Private Servers in Bathrooms, and 30,000 deleted emails.
This is what our worthless, mouth-breathing Congress hold hearings on a frivolous inquiry. Well, big whoop! A president wants loyalty from those who work for him. How utterly outrageous!
 
Instead of fighting ISIS, fixing Obamacare, cutting taxes, or even funding highways....
Instead of NSA abuses, Un-Masking, Private Servers in Bathrooms, and 30,000 deleted emails.
This is what our worthless, mouth-breathing Congress hold hearings on a frivolous inquiry. Well, big whoop! A president wants loyalty from those who work for him. How utterly outrageous!
Are you seriously suggesting Congress should not investigate when a President fires an FBI director and then goes on national TV to say I fired him to stop the Russia investigation???
 
Are you seriously suggesting Congress should not investigate when a President fires an FBI director and then goes on national TV to say I fired him to stop the Russia investigation???
Nice word salad. That may work on illiterate people. Not so much on those of us that can read.
 
Ignored for stupidity and hopelessness. You'd be going nuts if Obama had done this with ample justification.
The Left doesn't require proof that Trump has done anything illegal. That he is President is all the proof they require.
They take Comey's statement as an indictment, rather than what it is - his attempt to squirm his way out of trouble.
It is easy to put yourself on Trump's shoes watching this fake news circus and desperately looking any remaining federal employees in the justice department or national security that would be ethical and moral people that would help to stop the madness. It is easy to understand that.
The fascinating revelation here is that none existed. They were all sufficiently embedded in the Democrat machine that they were going to support any and all nefarious, crooked and even illegal (assuming they believed they had enough cover) means to destroy the man that would clear the swamp... meaning them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: millerbleach
The Left doesn't require proof that Trump has done anything illegal. That he is President is all the proof they require.
They take Comey's statement as an indictment, rather than what it is - his attempt to squirm his way out of trouble.
It is easy to put yourself on Trump's shoes watching this fake news circus and desperately looking any remaining federal employees in the justice department or national security that would be ethical and moral people that would help to stop the madness. It is easy to understand that.
The fascinating revelation here is that none existed. They were all sufficiently embedded in the Democrat machine that they were going to support any and all nefarious, crooked and even illegal (assuming they believed they had enough cover) means to destroy the man that would clear the swamp... meaning them.

NM doesn't want to hear different opinion's than his....... Stop it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: millerbleach
There is ample, well sourced reporting that trump has asked the FBI director, the head of the CIA, and the DNI to do something to end the Russia investigations.

And that he bragged to the Russians that firing comey would lower the pressure.

Of course congress is going to investigate this so they understand what happened.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT