ADVERTISEMENT

To use a line from

A

ag-man

Guest
my friends on mo sports,

Children are dying in Syria and around the world due to violence, and we are worried about jailing an old, fat women because she won't give a marriage license to a couple of Sally's .

And we wonder why people hate America?


And yes, she is correct, it is perverse, and wrong. Nice to see our country is starting to punish people for doing what is right......................... Thanks libs
 
Are you talking about the great follower of Christ who got knocked up by her boyfriend with twins while married only 6 months to another man. That whore has been married four times and is going to judge other people lifestyles? She is afraid she is going to go to hell for giving out a license? I bet she looks about as pretty as your old lady. What a looker.
 
Are you talking about the great follower of Christ who got knocked up by her boyfriend with twins while married only 6 months to another man. That whore has been married four times and is going to judge other people lifestyles? She is afraid she is going to go to hell for giving out a license? I bet she looks about as pretty as your old lady. What a looker.

Spoken like a true lib that has no idea what he is talking about.

Please do keep responding, there is no way I could make you look dumber than you are doing on your own, carry on fine sir.
 
Spoken like a true lib that has no idea what he is talking about.

Please do keep responding, there is no way I could make you look dumber than you are doing on your own, carry on fine sir.

The bible does say a man can divorce if the woman is immoral.

Guess she must be that way a lot.

Republicans tying themselves to this issue look batcrap crazy. Moderate voters just flock away. She will get rich off this.though

Would you feel the same about a soldier converting and refusing to fight??
 
1. Who is she to judge?
2. She took an oath to uphold the constitution. God says if a person take an oath, they are supposed to uphold that oath. Why does she not have to?
 
Spoken like a true lib that has no idea what he is talking about.

Please do keep responding, there is no way I could make you look dumber than you are doing on your own, carry on fine sir.
How is that a true lib?
 
my friends on mo sports,

Children are dying in Syria and around the world due to violence, and we are worried about jailing an old, fat women because she won't give a marriage license to a couple of Sally's .

And we wonder why people hate America?


And yes, she is correct, it is perverse, and wrong. Nice to see our country is starting to punish people for doing what is right......................... Thanks libs
She's totally wrong. I don't know how I feel about jailing her but she cannot do what she did.

Public officials have a different role in society than we do as common citizens. The court order reflects this. Her job is to administer the law as written, not to decide how it should be written.

Further the religious freedom argument is a smokescreen. something tells me if she tried to impose sharia law through her job all of her defenders would rant and rave about how terrible she was even though that falls under the same religious freedom edict they are saying. They don't want religious freedom. They want the right to impose their chosen beliefs, and only their beliefs, on others.
 
The bible does say a man can divorce if the woman is immoral.

Guess she must be that way a lot.

Republicans tying themselves to this issue look batcrap crazy. Moderate voters just flock away. She will get rich off this.though

Would you feel the same about a soldier converting and refusing to fight??

Yes
 
1. Who is she to judge?
2. She took an oath to uphold the constitution. God says if a person take an oath, they are supposed to uphold that oath. Why does she not have to?

She is not judging, she is refusing to take part in something immoral.

So the constitution says you have to give marriage license to gays? Must have missed that part.
 
She's totally wrong. I don't know how I feel about jailing her but she cannot do what she did.

Public officials have a different role in society than we do as common citizens. The court order reflects this. Her job is to administer the law as written, not to decide how it should be written.

Further the religious freedom argument is a smokescreen. something tells me if she tried to impose sharia law through her job all of her defenders would rant and rave about how terrible she was even though that falls under the same religious freedom edict they are saying. They don't want religious freedom. They want the right to impose their chosen beliefs, and only their beliefs, on others.
 
By the way, you all missed the whole point of the thread.

Doesn't surprise me much, other than NM.
 
She is not judging, she is refusing to take part in something immoral.

So the constitution says you have to give marriage license to gays? Must have missed that part.
The constitution says she has to do her job as described by a higher authority. She is choosing to ignore it.
She is judging. She has decided what is moral and immoral. She doesn't get to make that choice.
 
By the way, you all missed the whole point of the thread.

Doesn't surprise me much, other than NM.
No we didn't. You want to impose your moral authority and refuse a discussion about other's opinions. You suggest there is more important things to talk about, then tell us why everyone else is wrong and then attempt to insult our intelligence when we talk about our beliefs.
It's the same kind of stuff JR Kenny tries to pull all the time.
 
While I am opposed to homosexual marriage or any other marriage being sanctioned by the state, she has no legal authority to deny them a liscense. Her moral obligation would be to step down from her position if she believes doing her job would cause her to do something immoral.
 
No we didn't. You want to impose your moral authority and refuse a discussion about other's opinions. You suggest there is more important things to talk about, then tell us why everyone else is wrong and then attempt to insult our intelligence when we talk about our beliefs.
It's the same kind of stuff JR Kenny tries to pull all the time.

Yes, you did.
 
You called him a typical lib. PC without morals.
I think you would call me a typical lib, so then you would call me PC without morals.
Spin it how you want. You are being judgmental.
 
5wSg7nE.png
 
You called him a typical lib. PC without morals.
I think you would call me a typical lib, so then you would call me PC without morals.
Spin it how you want. You are being judgmental.
.

1.) I said true lib, not typical lib

2,) I WAS TALKING TO RUNUOVER. But, I guess if the shoe fits, wear it. I have never seen someone try so hard to be included in such an undesirable group.... Suit yourself.
 
You are correct. True lib. Good job being judgmental. Keep acting like you aren't.
 
To go back to the original post, it would be a good thing for us to have discussion of the toll borne by civilians in places like Syria, Libya, and so on
 
No we didn't. You want to impose your moral authority and refuse a discussion about other's opinions. You suggest there is more important things to talk about, then tell us why everyone else is wrong and then attempt to insult our intelligence when we talk about our beliefs.
It's the same kind of stuff JR Kenny tries to pull all the time.
Wow, this sounds like you are describing the libs on here talking about the conservatives...
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT