The story came out in the Washington Post. Come on with this nonsense.
The dossier is on of the top stories on Yahoo news when I open the site - one of the six with a picture.
Breitbart is a little further than I would go even. Maybe more like the Washington Examiner.
You may not believe this, but I look at Drudge more than I look at HP. Although HP's Congressional reporter is very good and you will learn some things if you check in on his work.
And what I love is that Clinton and DNC people were meeting with and getting information from RUSSIANS....Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
The Washington Post - October 24, 2017
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.1c262e569d07
Awesome. Blame others for a grievous act, before you get caught. I can taste the difference, delicious!
But wait.... the party of blame, is the blame! Delicious!!Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
The Washington Post - October 24, 2017
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.1c262e569d07
I don't suppose any of you saw the part of the report that says a REPUBLICAN originally hired this firm to do 'oppo research' on Trump during the primaries. When Trump got the nomination he no longer had a reason to continue spending his money on it so the DNC and the Clinton campaign picked it up. They did NOT tell the researchers what to look for, Russian or otherwise, just to keep doing the research. Not their fault the Russian connection showed up in the research. Maybe you'll recall that Trump and all his folks denied any meeting with Russians until it was obvious there had been such meetings then they lied about what they were called to the meeting for, until the truth came out about that too.
Who was the Republican ???? More unverified lies from "sources" who won't stand up in front of a camera on the record and tell their story.I don't suppose any of you saw the part of the report that says a REPUBLICAN originally hired this firm to do 'oppo research' on Trump during the primaries. When Trump got the nomination he no longer had a reason to continue spending his money on it so the DNC and the Clinton campaign picked it up. They did NOT tell the researchers what to look for, Russian or otherwise, just to keep doing the research. Not their fault the Russian connection showed up in the research. Maybe you'll recall that Trump and all his folks denied any meeting with Russians until it was obvious there had been such meetings then they lied about what they were called to the meeting for, until the truth came out about that too.
I have no problem with this. All the crooks should be thrown in jail if they are breaking the laws. We wouldn't have many people in government if this were the case including Mr. TrumpClinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
The Washington Post - October 24, 2017
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...3470754bbb9_story.html?utm_term=.1c262e569d07
I don't know but I'd bet the law firm getting paid for this research approached the DNC/ Clinton campaign after the pub that didn't want Trump to be the nominee gave it up and told them they have lots of research on Trump they might be interested in. Totally a guess on my part, I have no idea how that stuff works. I kinda liked the days when a candidate stood up to tell us what he was for and against, not how awful the other candidates were.
