ADVERTISEMENT

Real reason people arent for impeachment

You realize the general public reading the Mueller report has no bearing on Congress bringing or not bringing impeachment charges against the President right?

If he had done anything that was ACTUALLY an impeachable offense, Pelosi wouldn't have hesitated. You're just butthurt with a bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.
 
You realize the general public reading the Mueller report has no bearing on Congress bringing or not bringing impeachment charges against the President right?

If he had done anything that was ACTUALLY an impeachable offense, Pelosi wouldn't have hesitated. You're just butthurt with a bad case of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

You truly are pushing Miller for the all-around clueless Mosports poster.

Today 379 former federal prosecutors issued a joint statement saying DJT would have been indicted for obstruction of justice if he were not president. 379. 379 butt hurt prosecutors?
I guess TDS is contagious.

Pelosi knows he should be impeached. All of us who have read the report know he obstructed and should be removed. The republicans in the senate know it. They dont care. They are as sick as you and tard Miller.
 
Last edited:
So collusion is not a crime, but Trump obstructed an investigation into him not committing a crime, so he obstructed a non-existent crime investigation, was declared innocent of the non-crime by the left hero Mueller, publicly declared by the impeccable credentials of the Attorny General and Duck says anyone that doesn't believe he should be impeached is sick.

Got it.
 
This is borderline tard

"was declared innocent of the non-crime by the left hero Mueller, publicly declared by the impeccable credentials of theAttornyGeneral"

Mueller didnt declare him innocent of anything. "Impeccable credentials" of a cover up artist. Do you really not know Barr's history?

It doesnt matter what evidence you people see, your heads are up Trump's arse. If I kill someone I want you jagwads on the jury. There could be 52 eye witnesses, DNA, video and a confession and you would still go with your preconcieved stupidity.
 
This is borderline tard

"was declared innocent of the non-crime by the left hero Mueller, publicly declared by the impeccable credentials of theAttornyGeneral"

Mueller didnt declare him innocent of anything. "Impeccable credentials" of a cover up artist. Do you really not know Barr's history?

It doesnt matter what evidence you people see, your heads are up Trump's arse. If I kill someone I want you jagwads on the jury. There could be 52 eye witnesses, DNA, video and a confession and you would still go with your preconcieved stupidity.

If there's a good reason to impeach then DO IT. Quit crying about it and do it. Reality is, no laws were broken, there is NO justification to impeach or they would have done it. They've been chomping at the bit for two years to impeach, if they don't do it now, it won't get done.

But at least you'll be able to whine like the petulant brat you are and call others by an ableist slur.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 73 winch
This is borderline tard

"was declared innocent of the non-crime by the left hero Mueller, publicly declared by the impeccable credentials of theAttornyGeneral"

Mueller didnt declare him innocent of anything. "Impeccable credentials" of a cover up artist. Do you really not know Barr's history?

It doesnt matter what evidence you people see, your heads are up Trump's arse. If I kill someone I want you jagwads on the jury. There could be 52 eye witnesses, DNA, video and a confession and you would still go with your preconcieved stupidity.

I do know Barr's history. I know Mueller's history.

I also know the dems have nothing. If the did, they would proceed. All this dog and pony show is to appease their naive, blind, hateful, TDS followers.

Seems to be working well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirtyDan17
If there's a good reason to impeach then DO IT. Quit crying about it and do it. Reality is, no laws were broken, there is NO justification to impeach or they would have done it. They've been chomping at the bit for two years to impeach, if they don't do it now, it won't get done.

But at least you'll be able to whine like the petulant brat you are and call others by an ableist slur.
Pelosi doesn't want to impeach because in her mind, an non impeached President Trump is a weakness for the Republican party in 2020.
 
It definitely is.

379 ultra liberal prosecutors with an agenda? Yeah that's totally possible.
The real news here is that out of all the prosecutors in the country, ONLY 379 think Trump could be prosecuted. What for, I don't know.
 
You truly are pushing Miller for the all-around clueless Mosports poster.

Today 379 former federal prosecutors issued a joint statement saying DJT would have been indicted for obstruction of justice if he were not president. 379. 379 butt hurt prosecutors?
I guess TDS is contagious.

Pelosi knows he should be impeached. All of us who have read the report know he obstructed and should be removed. The republicans in the senate know it. They dont care. They are as sick as you and tard Miller.

I really want to get all of this straight....

So he is accused of obstructing justice into an investigation that proved he did not collude with Russia or you want him to found guilty of that? On top of that everybody has said this investigation would have never happened had Trump lost. Most people knew this was just the Dems being sore losers.

So my question and I am serious if you are being investigated for a crime you did not commit and you rail against that how did you obstruct justice if the outcome is what you wanted? I could understand if the report came out and said yes he is guilty of colluding with Russia then he might have obstructed justice, but since the outcome of the report is what he and most sane people believed truly happened with our election, how did he obstruct the outcome that favored him?
 
  • Like
Reactions: millerbleach
I really want to get all of this straight....

So he is accused of obstructing justice into an investigation that proved he did not collude with Russia or you want him to found guilty of that? On top of that everybody has said this investigation would have never happened had Trump lost. Most people knew this was just the Dems being sore losers.

So my question and I am serious if you are being investigated for a crime you did not commit and you rail against that how did you obstruct justice if the outcome is what you wanted? I could understand if the report came out and said yes he is guilty of colluding with Russia then he might have obstructed justice, but since the outcome of the report is what he and most sane people believed truly happened with our election, how did he obstruct the outcome that favored him?
You REALLY have to ask.
 
I really want to get all of this straight....

So he is accused of obstructing justice into an investigation that proved he did not collude with Russia or you want him to found guilty of that? On top of that everybody has said this investigation would have never happened had Trump lost. Most people knew this was just the Dems being sore losers.

So my question and I am serious if you are being investigated for a crime you did not commit and you rail against that how did you obstruct justice if the outcome is what you wanted? I could understand if the report came out and said yes he is guilty of colluding with Russia then he might have obstructed justice, but since the outcome of the report is what he and most sane people believed truly happened with our election, how did he obstruct the outcome that favored him?

It's quite obvious Trump didn't want the truth that he did nothing to be found out and did everything in his power to prevent it.
 
I really want to get all of this straight....

So he is accused of obstructing justice into an investigation that proved he did not collude with Russia or you want him to found guilty of that? On top of that everybody has said this investigation would have never happened had Trump lost. Most people knew this was just the Dems being sore losers.

So my question and I am serious if you are being investigated for a crime you did not commit and you rail against that how did you obstruct justice if the outcome is what you wanted? I could understand if the report came out and said yes he is guilty of colluding with Russia then he might have obstructed justice, but since the outcome of the report is what he and most sane people believed truly happened with our election, how did he obstruct the outcome that favored him?
Ask bill clinton
 
You REALLY have to ask.

Yes I do, we waste enough tax dollars and the government already grinds to a halt. The Dems were so sure that this investigation would prove that Trump only won with the help of the Russians that they pinned everything on Mueller's investigation coming up with that outcome. I remember them saying hey Pubs you will have to except the facts of Mueller's report. How quickly they forgot that when it wasn't the outcome they wanted. So Mueller's report is out there, and there was no Russian collusion, and Mueller could not even for sure say that Trump obstructed justice and he was the one doing the investigation. Let's move on.

By the way if Bidden is the best the Dems have they are going to lose again, Biden who goes out trying to tell the middle class don't worry about China, well the middle class has been feeling the affects of China for decades...Bidden is out of touch!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 73 winch
Yes I do, we waste enough tax dollars and the government already grinds to a halt. The Dems were so sure that this investigation would prove that Trump only won with the help of the Russians that they pinned everything on Mueller's investigation coming up with that outcome. I remember them saying hey Pubs you will have to except the facts of Mueller's report. How quickly they forgot that when it wasn't the outcome they wanted. So Mueller's report is out there, and there was no Russian collusion, and Mueller could not even for sure say that Trump obstructed justice and he was the one doing the investigation. Let's move on.

By the way if Bidden is the best the Dems have they are going to lose again, Biden who goes out trying to tell the middle class don't worry about China, well the middle class has been feeling the affects of China for decades...Bidden is out of touch!!

Tulsi Gabbard is the best candidate the Dems have and she has ZERO shot of getting the nomination. Trump should win in a landslide barring something crazy happening.
 
Yes I do, we waste enough tax dollars and the government already grinds to a halt. The Dems were so sure that this investigation would prove that Trump only won with the help of the Russians that they pinned everything on Mueller's investigation coming up with that outcome. I remember them saying hey Pubs you will have to except the facts of Mueller's report. How quickly they forgot that when it wasn't the outcome they wanted. So Mueller's report is out there, and there was no Russian collusion, and Mueller could not even for sure say that Trump obstructed justice and he was the one doing the investigation. Let's move on.

By the way if Bidden is the best the Dems have they are going to lose again, Biden who goes out trying to tell the middle class don't worry about China, well the middle class has been feeling the affects of China for decades...Bidden is out of touch!!

If didnt cost you a dime. They confiscated enough Manafort funds to pay for the hoe dam fing.

If the Clinton campaign had 200 contacts with russians during the campaign and they helped her win, would you have wanted an investigation?

If she had ordered people to lie, fired those leading the investigation and used numerous methods to block the investigation herself would you say she was obstructing?

As a voter if Hillary had known the russians were helping her win and refused to admit it would that make you kiss her arse like you kiss Trump's? If she hired an AG to stonewall congress would you be cheering?
 
Mueller's report, which I have read, details dozens of contacts between the campaign and russia. Acting like that never happened because he cant "prove" they conspired in advance of their actions is what you are doing. Not having enough evidence to indict does not prove someone innocent.

He is clearly guilty of obstructing a valid and needed investigation.
 
Yes I do, we waste enough tax dollars and the government already grinds to a halt. The Dems were so sure that this investigation would prove that Trump only won with the help of the Russians that they pinned everything on Mueller's investigation coming up with that outcome. I remember them saying hey Pubs you will have to except the facts of Mueller's report. How quickly they forgot that when it wasn't the outcome they wanted. So Mueller's report is out there, and there was no Russian collusion, and Mueller could not even for sure say that Trump obstructed justice and he was the one doing the investigation. Let's move on.

By the way if Bidden is the best the Dems have they are going to lose again, Biden who goes out trying to tell the middle class don't worry about China, well the middle class has been feeling the affects of China for decades...Bidden is out of touch!!
That is NOT what Mueller said about obstruction and you know it. He cited 10 times he thinks Trump obstructed justice and 4 times that were were worse than the others. Not once did he say Trump was cleared of obstruction, that's the Barr version of the Mueller report.
 


2. Trump welcomed that help.



What part about Mueller stating "No American knowingly conspired with Russia" is hard to understand?


If the democratic nominee knows a certain demographic, such as African Americans, or gays are going to help them win an election, should they publicly shun them?
 
3. Trump tried to obstruct the investigation of his actions.

What actions?

"No American knowingly conspired with Russia"

Dude, give it up
 
Mueller's report, which I have read, details dozens of contacts between the campaign and russia. Acting like that never happened because he cant "prove" they conspired in advance of their actions is what you are doing. Not having enough evidence to indict does not prove someone innocent.

He is clearly guilty of obstructing a valid and needed investigation.
Having business contacts with Russian citizens has nothing to do with conspiring with the government of Russia.

Biden said last week that he had been talking to foreign leaders who were asking him to run to unseat Trump. Isn’t that conspiring with a foreign government who is trying to influence a presidential election??
 
Having business contacts with Russian citizens has nothing to do with conspiring with the government of Russia.

Biden said last week that he had been talking to foreign leaders who were asking him to run to unseat Trump. Isn’t that conspiring with a foreign government who is trying to influence a presidential election??

No.
 
Having business contacts with Russian citizens has nothing to do with conspiring with the government of Russia.

Biden said last week that he had been talking to foreign leaders who were asking him to run to unseat Trump. Isn’t that conspiring with a foreign government who is trying to influence a presidential election??

Business contacts? Read the MF report. Dont comment again until you do, fool.
 
Last edited:
If a cop is chasing a man down the street and I tackle the cop but it turns out the man didnt commit a crime am I obstructing justice. YOU ARE DAMN RIGHT I AM. GET A FREAKIN CLUE.
 
If the report exonerates Trump, then why not have Barr get the grand jury portions released and let them see the entire report?

If Trump did nothing wrong why fight the subpoenas?

If Trump did nothing wrong, why lie every freakin day for 2 years?
 
You're obviously not familiar with how the American justice system works.

You obviously arent familiar with having high standards for the presidency.

If the report exonerates Trump, then why not have Barr get the grand jury portions released and let them see the entire report?

If Trump did nothing wrong why fight the subpoenas?

If Trump did nothing wrong, why lie every freakin day for 2 years?
 
If the report exonerates Trump, then why not have Barr get the grand jury portions released and let them see the entire report?

Are you familiar with the term "moving the goalpost?

You stated for two years that the Mueller report would get Trump impeached. It didn't.

When it didn't you screamed for the unredacted version. That didn't lead to impeachment either.

Now you're screaming for the Grand Jury portions hoping that it will make a difference and get baby what he wants.

This is called a fishing expedition. You keep casting li(n)es hoping you can snag something. Why do you get to fish indefinitely using taxpayer money?
 
Are you familiar with the term "moving the goalpost?

You stated for two years that the Mueller report would get Trump impeached. It didn't.

When it didn't you screamed for the unredacted version. That didn't lead to impeachment either.

Now you're screaming for the Grand Jury portions hoping that it will make a difference and get baby what he wants.

This is called a fishing expedition. You keep casting li(n)es hoping you can snag something. Why do you get to fish indefinitely using taxpayer money?

When it didn't you screamed for the unredacted version. No I didnt. Wth are you talking about? Read the entire report, fool.

You cant answer simple questions. Can you.


If the report exonerates Trump, then why not have Barr get the grand jury portions released and let them see the entire report?

If Trump did nothing wrong why fight the subpoenas?

If Trump did nothing wrong, why lie every freakin day for 2 years?

Answer the questions Dan.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT