ADVERTISEMENT

MSHSAA changes??

wahoolives

Well-Known Member
Jan 9, 2006
525
150
43
What do these two proposals that passed mean for basketball?

PROPOSAL 9 - (Sport and Activity Classification) - (PASSED) - 376 FOR, 51 AGAINST

Amends By-Law 5.1, District and State Tournament Procedures, to restructure the procedures for sport and activity classification for districts and the state series.


PROPOSAL 10 - (Competitive Equity between Public and Non-Public Schools) - (PASSED) - 294 FOR, 133 AGAINST

Amends By-Law 5.1.5, Co-Ed Enrollments, by removing the 1.35 enrollment multiplier that is currently in place for non-public and charter schools, and replaces it with New By-Law 5.1.7, Championship Factor, which re-classifies non-public and charter schools based on a point system connected to advancement in districts and the state series over a six-year period.
 
What do these two proposals that passed mean for basketball?

PROPOSAL 9 - (Sport and Activity Classification) - (PASSED) - 376 FOR, 51 AGAINST

Amends By-Law 5.1, District and State Tournament Procedures, to restructure the procedures for sport and activity classification for districts and the state series.


PROPOSAL 10 - (Competitive Equity between Public and Non-Public Schools) - (PASSED) - 294 FOR, 133 AGAINST

Amends By-Law 5.1.5, Co-Ed Enrollments, by removing the 1.35 enrollment multiplier that is currently in place for non-public and charter schools, and replaces it with New By-Law 5.1.7, Championship Factor, which re-classifies non-public and charter schools based on a point system connected to advancement in districts and the state series over a six-year period.
Basketball will go to 6 classes. Proposal 10, anybodies guess.
 
If I understand this correctly, a few strong privates have to move up due to the new "championship factor", and a lot get to move down due to the multiplier being eliminated. This sounds like it was written by a private school committee and the wool was pulled over the eyes of the admins who voted for it.
Your understanding matches the discussion about this topic on the football board.
 
What's the anticipated number of teams in each class for 6 classes?
 
What's the anticipated number of teams in each class for 6 classes?

This is from _charger_ over on the boys forum. This seems about right to me.

My friend who is an AD sent this to me...
Class 1 (112 teams) Enrollment: 10-80
Class 2 (108 teams) Enrollment: 81-148
Class 3 (104 teams) Enrollment: 149-261
Class 4 (92 teams) Enrollment: 262-509
Class 5 (71 teams) Enrollment: 510-1000
Class 6 (71 teams) Enrollment: 1001-1834
 
This is from _charger_ over on the boys forum. This seems about right to me.

My friend who is an AD sent this to me...
Class 1 (112 teams) Enrollment: 10-80
Class 2 (108 teams) Enrollment: 81-148
Class 3 (104 teams) Enrollment: 149-261
Class 4 (92 teams) Enrollment: 262-509
Class 5 (71 teams) Enrollment: 510-1000
Class 6 (71 teams) Enrollment: 1001-1834
This lines up with a guideline that i read on the football board. Other than class 1 obviously, the goal was to have the largest school in each class be no more than double the size of the smallest school in each class.
 
This is from _charger_ over on the boys forum. This seems about right to me.

My friend who is an AD sent this to me...
Class 1 (112 teams) Enrollment: 10-80
Class 2 (108 teams) Enrollment: 81-148
Class 3 (104 teams) Enrollment: 149-261
Class 4 (92 teams) Enrollment: 262-509
Class 5 (71 teams) Enrollment: 510-1000
Class 6 (71 teams) Enrollment: 1001-1834
When would this proposal go into effect?
 
Whatever makes it easier for Glendale to FINALLY AT LONG LAST bring home a state title, I'm for! Period! Full Stop! The End!
 
Remaining in Class 5 would be fine. Now, we just need to stop getting in our own way and get the job done after 56 years.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT