... and Barr whtewashed it !Most of it is true.
The Mueller report is also true.
... and Barr whtewashed it !Most of it is true.
The Mueller report is also true.
If this was on the up and up why did they continue the investigation after they found out the Steel Dossier was 100% a lie and fabricated.
I could post a link of the timeline of when they figured out it was false, their own documents proving that but links seem to not be appreciated.
And you know as well as I the old guard Rep. hated Trump as much as the Dems most of them are RINO even though that term is very fluid.
If this was on the up and up why did they continue the investigation after they found out the Steel Dossier was 100% a lie and fabricated.
I could post a link of the timeline of when they figured out it was false, their own documents proving that but links seem to not be appreciated.
And you know as well as I the old guard Rep. hated Trump as much as the Dems most of them are RINO even though that term is very fluid.
Can't wait for another 3 page explanation as to why this is wrong. Just wait for it because he thinks if he uses enough words everybody will have to think he's right on every subject every time!Did the F.B.I. open the investigation because of the dossier?
No. Mr. Trump and his allies have insinuated that the F.B.I. based the Russia investigation on the dossier. But when counterintelligence agents launched the effort on July 30, 2016, they did not yet know about the dossier. An inspector general report established that Mr. Steele’s reports reached that counterintelligence team on Sept. 19, 2016.
The basis for the investigation was instead that WikiLeaks had disrupted the Democratic National Convention by releasing Democratic emails believed to have been stolen by Russian hackers, and that an Australian diplomat said a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser had bragged to him about apparent outreach from Russia involving an offer to help the campaign by anonymously releasing information damaging to Mrs. Clinton.
Why the Discredited Dossier Does Not Undercut the Russia Investigation (Published 2021)
Donald J. Trump and his backers say revelations about the Steele dossier show the Russia investigation was a “hoax.” That is not what the facts indicate.www.nytimes.com
He's really a legend. The best. Everyone says so.Can't wait for another 3 page explanation as to why this is wrong. Just wait for it because he thinks if he uses enough words everybody will have to think he's right on every subject every time!
Did the F.B.I. open the investigation because of the dossier?
No. Mr. Trump and his allies have insinuated that the F.B.I. based the Russia investigation on the dossier. But when counterintelligence agents launched the effort on July 30, 2016, they did not yet know about the dossier. An inspector general report established that Mr. Steele’s reports reached that counterintelligence team on Sept. 19, 2016.
The basis for the investigation was instead that WikiLeaks had disrupted the Democratic National Convention by releasing Democratic emails believed to have been stolen by Russian hackers, and that an Australian diplomat said a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser had bragged to him about apparent outreach from Russia involving an offer to help the campaign by anonymously releasing information damaging to Mrs. Clinton.
Why the Discredited Dossier Does Not Undercut the Russia Investigation (Published 2021)
Donald J. Trump and his backers say revelations about the Steele dossier show the Russia investigation was a “hoax.” That is not what the facts indicate.www.nytimes.com
No that one guy thinks that way. He was always like that.The Rise and Fall of the ‘Steele Dossier’
A case study in mass hysteria and media credulity.www.thenation.com
Even this Left wing outlet get's it....To bad the NYT doesn't. They still maintain the party line.
That one guy just thinks like that way always ..what one guy the writer for a Leftwing propaganda magazine who basically trashes Trump with baseless and demeaning accusations but then refutes the validity of the Dossier cause he just thinks that way ...gotcha and because the article and analysis of the Dossier was from 1/21 that makes it less relevant for Veer2Eternity for Reasons....the Dossier hasn't changed from it's release as being false and made up.No that one guy thinks that way. He was always like that.
Also that's 1/21.
Most of the dossier was fact.
Not sure how much has been disproven.
That's how intel works.
stop citing trashThat one guy just thinks like that way always ..what one guy the writer for a Leftwing propaganda magazine who basically trashes Trump with baseless and demeaning accusations but then refutes the validity of the Dossier cause he just thinks that way ...gotcha and because the article and analysis of the Dossier was from 1/21 that makes it less relevant for Veer2Eternity for Reasons....the Dossier hasn't changed from it's release as being false and made up.
Jeez you do know that more and more info is coming out about how it was a political John Durham's investigation is delving into that rather deeply. Sure the MSM will lie and say try to discredit the investigation but what's strange is they are producing evidence.
Clinton 2016 campaign, lawyer, tech exec in ‘joint venture’ to smear Trump, Durham alleges
The claim is arguing for the admission of additional evidence ahead of Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann’s pending trial for allegedly lying to the FBI.nypost.com
The point is as the writer for The Nation stated ...BOTH parties play Dirty and political games. I get that but you seem to have a hard time buying into the idea that the Dem's are masters as Dirty underhanded political games....I actually applaud the Dem. party they are way better than the Pubs at this type of stuff it's not even close.
LOL and you site CNN and NYT that is a hoot....Seriously that all you got is that the source is Trash. I get it you got no defense so you attack......stop citing trash
In 2017, the New York Post was reported to be the preferred newspaper of U.S. president Donald Trump,[54][55] who maintains frequent contact with its owner Murdoch.[55] The Post had promoted Trump's celebrity since at least the 1980s.[56] In October 2020, the Post endorsed Trump for re-election, citing his "promises made, promises kept" policy.[57] Weeks after Trump was defeated and he sought to overturn the election results, the Post published a front-page editorial asking the president to "stop the insanity", stating that he was "cheering for an undemocratic coup", commenting: "If you insist on spending your final days in office threatening to burn it all down, that will be how you are remembered. Not as a revolutionary, but as the anarchist holding the match." The Post characterized Trump attorney Sidney Powell as a "crazy person", and his former national security advisor Michael Flynn’s suggestion to declare martial law as "tantamount to treason."[58][59]
Around March 2021, Keith Poole, a top editor at The Sun, another Murdoch-owned tabloid, was appointed as the editor in chief[60] at the New York Post.[61][62] Around the same time, at least eight journalists had left the paper.[62]
NY Post is complete garbage. It's for people who can't do higher order thinking.LOL and you site CNN and NYT that is a hoot....Seriously that all you got is that the source is Trash. I get it you got no defense so you attack......
Thanks for your opinion, clearly you're a higher order thinker, since you are so in the know on the legitimacy of media outlets
influence peddling and corruption?CNN, Wall St. Journal, and the NY Slimes are all jumping on the Hunter Biden story, which is really a story about influence peddling, and ultimately Addled Joe and his brother's corruption.
influence peddling and corruption?
Ivanka's china deals might be a place for you to start.
clearly.Addled Joe has a longer and much more vibrant history of influence peddling. We will start with him. Besides, they need to prosecute him for his crimes before he is completely incompetent...he is halfway there now.
Do approval ratings matter now? Biden won't run again.In case you forgot, Joe Xiden is the president, has been for over a year. What's his approval rating again?
clearly.
Do approval ratings matter now? Biden won't run again.
Please let the GOP take back congress and have more benghazis.
The sad part is JFK Jr. would probably be president today if not for his plane crash. We got trump and biden instead.Won't run again? LOL...that's an understatement. He can barely stand--or talk for that matter. As Don Rickles would say, "He's two blocks away from the cemetery."
Man you even attacked a way left leaning Source that refuted the NYT/CNN/MSNBC/CBS/NBC/ABC/WashPost false narrative about the Steel Dossier and the Mueller investigation.NY Post is complete garbage. It's for people who can't do higher order thinking.
Basically any Murdoch publication is there to make him money and he does that by influencing politics.
Don't need a defense against clearly biased hack publications. Only a fool believes them.
I got nothing of substance but I gotta reply to save face so here it goes.....
You must have been Charlie Brown's teacher.
Typical...You must have been Charlie Brown's teacher.