I guess you could pray that he dies because I already have.Originally posted by Duck_walk:
Probably not a good question because I pray every day that Miller doesn't reproduce.
I guess you could pray that he dies because I already have.Originally posted by Duck_walk:
Probably not a good question because I pray every day that Miller doesn't reproduce.
There aren't textbooks that need replacing every year?Originally posted by millerbleach:
Yeah, they could waste a lot more....duh.Originally posted by wcowherd:
If the $300k number is $10k per student, I don't think that's unreasonable when you take into account that pays all the teachers and support staff salaries and plus textbooks plus technology, I think you could do a lot worse. I certainly don't think a school district like, say, miller spends too much per student.
Textbooks and technology are not every year expenses.
As I said, there is way too much waste and red tape.
Salaries don't come close to exhausting 10K/student.
Facilities are a big expense but even 1K/student/year would be more than sufficient to cover that.
I'm talking national average not a specific school.
I guess they never taught reading at any of your many ecucational institutions.Originally posted by wcowherd:
There aren't textbooks that need replacing every year?Originally posted by millerbleach:
Yeah, they could waste a lot more....duh.Originally posted by wcowherd:
If the $300k number is $10k per student, I don't think that's unreasonable when you take into account that pays all the teachers and support staff salaries and plus textbooks plus technology, I think you could do a lot worse. I certainly don't think a school district like, say, miller spends too much per student.
Textbooks and technology are not every year expenses.
As I said, there is way too much waste and red tape.
Salaries don't come close to exhausting 10K/student.
Facilities are a big expense but even 1K/student/year would be more than sufficient to cover that.
I'm talking national average not a specific school.
You don't think schools need to pay for Internet every year?
You don't think schools need to pay for IT support?
I want to get to the most astounding comment you've made in quite some time..."1k/student/year.
Let's take Miller as an example. Miller has an enrollment of 152 kids, so under the millerbleach plan, that's $152k for the entire district. If you say that the median teacher's salary in Miller should be $30k per year (that's a pretty pathetic average salary), then Miller can pay for...5 teachers, and nothing else.
LOL. That might be your best idea ever!
It varies greatly from school to school. Some are far below the 11K/student national average the US spends. Some are 25K/yr. It depends largely on what you are paying for. Basic education, extra-curriculars, prestige, location, etc. Several rural Christian schools are 2K/yr or less. Many churches have facilities that are maintained already. Many teachers forego public schools in favor of privates to get more freedom to teach over babysitting problem kids whose parents could care less.Originally posted by generalt:
How much for Private school tuition?? Is it more than the $8500 that a public school requires.
Of course it's crazy low. It's absolutely insane.Originally posted by Neutron Monster:
Yes. It can be higher or lower depending upon the level of services provided.
Most private schools also use public school services in STL for providing special school type of services. Also you have to account for subsidization (some schools are church subsidized) and also for schools that bring a few kids in on scholarship. Also have to account for how fees/extras are handled - book fees, cost of lunches, etc.
In general the bare bones religious schools tend to be cheaper because they offer fewer services and pay the teachers very little. The high end schools are much, much more (rossman, priory, micds, new city, etc.) Private schools have costs which vary with the desired level of service.
If you look at charter schools, which operate under public school mandates but often have more freedom in terms of how they spend money, their costs usually aren't materially less than the public schools.
I think schools could spend money more wisely but the idea that you can manage technology, utilities, food, books, and fixtures for 1k or less seems crazy low to me.
Can you not read either or is this another strawman.Originally posted by Neutron Monster:
I think schools could spend money more wisely but the idea that you can manage technology, utilities, food, books, and fixtures for 1k or less seems crazy low to me.
Cowherd said it then you agreed and expanded it further.Speaking of strawmen where did I claim you said that?
LOLCowherd said it then you agreed and expanded it further.
No strawmen here. You've got that cornered.