ADVERTISEMENT

Who gets the upset tonight....

I wouldn’t bet money on it but I think neosho has at least a shot to take down a short handed Carthage.

And I think Webb city will beat #2 grain valley although I’m not sure that’s really an upset other than on paper.
Neither is what they were in that C5 quarterfinal for sure. Have not seen Webb in person but have GV I see others talking about them being the most physical team Kearney played. Ummmm maybe. I still go Fort Week 1. In saying that no way to figure these intersectional games................
  • Like
Reactions: cardsfan200306

Maybe

The issue stems back to 2016. The Democrats planned on 8 years of Hilary and did not feel like they had to have another viable candidate until 2024. Trump won the election and it set off a firestorm in the Democrats because they needed a new popular candidate that they did not truly believe they would need to have for the 2020 election. Then it gets made worse in part due to their effort to derail Trump in the perception of the American public rather than focus on finding someone that independents could get behind.

Michelle Obama was probably their choice to groom for 2024 but the private sector of making money off of political influence has been nice to the Obamas, post-White House. Furthermore, Democrats need a candidate that is genuinely appealing to the old guard as well as the new guard of progressives. Remember, many Democrats are old-school farmers and they are grounded in their faith and service toward people, and not many can relate to the new "woke' ideals of the younger generations. Harris just is not relatable to people overall because she comes across as fake, disingenuous, and condescending. (Yes, I understand that Trump fits that mold).

All in all the Democrats are probably in more disarray than they would like to admit to right now. These individuals will not be considered, but could bridge a gap to the 2032 or 2036 elections: Steve Bullock, Joe Manchin, Andy Beshear, Josh Shapiro. Moderate, moderate, moderate...
Thats nonsense about Michelle Obama, she had made it very clear when hates politics and the political life and would never consider running.

JD estimates they can deport a million a year

Trying to find something newer this is from 2017 But even with those numbers it looks like it would be cheaper to deport. They have the cost of deportation at $124 billion, so cost have con down!

But I tend to agree with this synapses.
  • Researchers agree that illegal immigrants overwhelmingly have modest levels of education — most have not completed high school or have only a high school education. There is also agreement that immigrants with this level of education are a significant net fiscal drain, creating more in costs for government than they pay in taxes.
  • The NAS estimated the lifetime fiscal impact (taxes paid minus services used) of immigrants based on their educational attainment. Averaging those estimates and applying them to the education level of illegal immigrants shows a net fiscal drain of $65,292 per illegal — excluding any costs for their children
  • Based on this estimate, there is a total lifetime fiscal drain of $746.3 billion. This assumes 11.43 million illegal immigrants are in the country based on the U.S. government's most recent estimate.
  • The fiscal cost created by illegal immigrants of $746.3 billion compares to total a cost of deportation of $124.1 billion, assuming a FY 2016 cost per deportation, or $67.6 billion using FY 2012 deportation costs.
  • Like
Reactions: Arcola and 65TPT

Trump just needs a tie

Your “I can have serious intellectual discussions with Trump voters” act is hilarious.

They voted for someone who thinks foreign countries pay the tariffs and he can stop both those wars in 24 hours. He said kids are going to public schools and coming home a different gender without parent permission. And they voted for him.
And you think they will listen to your logical arguments????

No, I don't. I obviously just like to hear myself talk. And when I'm listening to myself, I like to at least sound civil.

Maybe

😂 lot of soul searching going on? Pete will fix the Supreme Court? Pete will fix the government? Can Pete fix all those diddy tapes? You are too funny. I guess you really think 72 plus million people voted for the second coming of Hitler?

You know it was his vice president-elect who specifically called him that, right? I don't think he's the second coming of Hitler, but J.D. Vance certainly did.
  • Like
Reactions: HomeyR

Maybe

The issue stems back to 2016. The Democrats planned on 8 years of Hilary and did not feel like they had to have another viable candidate until 2024. Trump won the election and it set off a firestorm in the Democrats because they needed a new popular candidate that they did not truly believe they would need to have for the 2020 election. Then it gets made worse in part due to their effort to derail Trump in the perception of the American public rather than focus on finding someone that independents could get behind.

Michelle Obama was probably their choice to groom for 2024 but the private sector of making money off of political influence has been nice to the Obamas, post-White House. Furthermore, Democrats need a candidate that is genuinely appealing to the old guard as well as the new guard of progressives. Remember, many Democrats are old-school farmers and they are grounded in their faith and service toward people, and not many can relate to the new "woke' ideals of the younger generations. Harris just is not relatable to people overall because she comes across as fake, disingenuous, and condescending. (Yes, I understand that Trump fits that mold).

All in all the Democrats are probably in more disarray than they would like to admit to right now. These individuals will not be considered, but could bridge a gap to the 2032 or 2036 elections: Steve Bullock, Joe Manchin, Andy Beshear, Josh Shapiro. Moderate, moderate, moderate...
  • Like
Reactions: 65TPT and Arcola

Why is Willard terrible?

I agree. And I also understand why coaches make wholesale changes sometimes also. Most of the time, especially in smaller schools they see how hard a the kids work and just want to put them in a position to be competitive.
My little town in KS ran flexbone. We simply ran out of big kids up front. They simply were none in the school. We had skill kids so the change was made to the spread to get the ball out fast. But that example is from a school with less than 250 kids total. A bigger school should have fewer issues with this.

I make the argument all the time that big offensive linemen, while useful in any offense, aren't needed to run the flexbone successfully. Smaller athletic linemen are perfectly fine because I believe, in high school at least, athletic linemen beat chunky linemen far more often than not. Would I prefer larger O linemen (or larger athletic O linemen, ideally)? Of course I would if given the choice, but if you have a D lineman you can't block...don't block him; read him and double team the D lineman at the point of attack. It's not the most glorious offense, and certainly can be boring, but it is one that is very sustainable with lesser talent and size. It's also one that can easily adapt to being in the pistol/gun and adding spread elements when the talent/situation calls for it.

Maybe

Pete is brilliant. He is an incredible debater and interviewee. He has a plan to fairly setup the Supreme Court to get rid of partisanship and he has a lot of other great ideas for fixing the government.
😂 lot of soul searching going on? Pete will fix the Supreme Court? Pete will fix the government? Can Pete fix all those diddy tapes? You are too funny. I guess you really think 72 plus million people voted for the second coming of Hitler?
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT