He did ask for a link (not his own) not a statement.The draft Senate bill allows the Sec. of Treasury to allow buybacks at will.
He did ask for a link (not his own) not a statement.The draft Senate bill allows the Sec. of Treasury to allow buybacks at will.
I get that this guy didn’t take them together but maybe Trump is on to something..."HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine"
This is absurd nonsense that the President should not be saying.
It isn't proof but it is as valuable of information as the obligatory stories about the random child on a ventilator. There are exceptions in everything.I get that this guy didn’t take them together but maybe Trump is on to something...
It’s good that people are trying things. But come on that’s an anecdote. Not a controlled trial of a drug. A 52 year old recovering from coronavirus one time in front of doctors who’ve never treated it before is not proof that a drug does or does not work.I get that this guy didn’t take them together but maybe Trump is on to something...
No, they don’t. They are trying it and many other potential treatments No country or serious health agency is saying it works. Stop with the misinformation.It isn't proof but it is as valuable of information as the obligatory stories about the random child on a ventilator. There are exceptions in everything.
Other countries deeper into this illness say the drug helps.....some say a lot.
Well if you watched the video within the article, there was actually a second person who credits the drug with helping him combat the virus and even says it’s helped SK.It’s good that people are trying things. But come on that’s an anecdote. Not a controlled trial of a drug. A 52 year old recovering from coronavirus one time in front of doctors who’ve never treated it before is not proof that a drug does or does not work.
I read the article.Well if you watched the video within the article, there was actually a second person who credits the drug with helping him combat the virus and even says it’s helped SK.
But why would you read/listen to the whole article.
Did you or did you not watch the video within the article?I read the article.
and again that article flat sucks as evidence of anything. For one they’re not going to interview someone who took it and died because they’re dead. And two there’s a reason we base medical treatments on controlled trials of what works and what does. You have to study a population with a credible sample size and compare it to a sample that doesn’t get the drug. Lots of 52 year olds get the disease and go home fine without getting the drug. That doesn’t tell you anything on its own
I didn’t and I don’t care to because it’s a meaningless anecdote.Did you or did you not watch the video within the article?
Trying is fine. We should be trying a lot of things. But don’t pretend we know anything yet. 1 or 2 people living is not evidence of anything.No one said it was a flat out cure but early test and results show that it May in acute cases slow the virus allowing the body's immune system to catch up. The Jury is still out but it's being used.
Of course, it doesn’t fit your narrative.I didn’t and I don’t care to because it’s a meaningless anecdote.
Find me an actual controlled study from an American hospital.
I'm not going to read their BS. I've heard the one life saved mouthed by these idiots. If this were the metric, they'd ban cars.Nice headline, CNN. Guess they’ll do whatever for clicks.
People you should be very skeptical of any of these claims. There’s going to be a lot of people trying to pretend they have a solution. Let the experts work on it and experiment. They’ll let us know when they have something. Listen to them. Stay home with your close family. Wash your hands. Do the right thing.
It isn't just SK. Japan has lots of results too.Well if you watched the video within the article, there was actually a second person who credits the drug with helping him combat the virus and even says it’s helped SK.
But why would you read/listen to the whole article.
This is delusional. Be better.The narrative is the Democrats want a depression.
Japan had very few cases and no serious amount of trials. Try againIt isn't just SK. Japan has lots of results too.
Don't you know we need 5 years of red tape as opposed to other countries use results? Come on.....the experts!
Self medicating with a malaria pill that you don’t understand is insane. Jesus.You are overstating the danger of people trying to self medicate..with quinine. Clearly in a effort to make Trump look bad.
Self medicating? Who is promoting that? You can't get it off the shelf in Walgreens!Self medicating with a malaria pill that you don’t understand is insane. Jesus.
You started a thread using the term "bailouts" looming. Which is false. Be better.This is delusional. Be better.
Self-medicating is the new term. Why is the media driving a wedge between Dr. Fauci and Trump?Self medicating? Who is promoting that? You can't get it off the shelf in Walgreens!
The media will go to know lengths. NBC ran the story that some crazy women took chloroquine phosphate and it put her in the ICU and killed her husband. It's just beyond idiocy. Fish tank cleaner? Fish tank cleaner! It says not for human consumption on the bottle! I feel sorry for people that are so stupid!Self-medicating is the new term. Why is the media driving a wedge between Dr. Fauci and Trump?
Dont forget the most important MEDIA question for the DNC to ask is how your relationship with Dr. F? IDIOTS.Don't forget some experts have ties to Big Pharm...
Dont forget the most important MEDIA question for the DNC to ask is how your relationship with Dr. F? IDIOTS.
Giving billions of dollars of grants to a Fortune 500 company without wiping the equity to zero is the definition of a bailout.You started a thread using the term "bailouts" looming. Which is false. Be better.
You supported the Dem Bill by writing this thing is going to be "Christmas". Be better.
The democrats were not even debating oversight.Giving billions of dollars of grants to a Fortune 500 company without wiping the equity to zero is the definition of a bailout.
And the Christmas tree comment wasn't meant as a compliment. People know the bill has to pass and it's a bottomless pit of money so they're trying to shove all sorts of stuff in it.
You're really close to being ignored, this is just total nonsense.
This is funny.TRIGGERED!!!!!!!!! ..... Again......
You have anger issues.
He watches the DNC media. Follow the narrative or you will be ignored.The democrats were not even debating oversight.
Tell the truth bruh. The bill had been worked on by both parties and Schumer had fundamentally agreed to it. Pelosi shows up with Schumer's nuts in her purse and rejects the Republican bill out of hand though it had been worked on and writes a new bill by inserting random garbage. She then prevents any type of discussion by filibustering 3 separate times.
Now you can have a reasonable conversation in the oversight provisions on the loans to be provided by the treasury department. I've already posted my personal preference. We both know the banks are in the best position to decide who is going to survive and who isn't. I don't want politicians with no expertise in business deciding who and how these loans are handed out. I don't like Treasury doing it either. If the banks, backed by the Treasury, are taking the risk they're more likely to decide what is best. Certainly not these morons in congress particularly by the democrat side as shown clearly in their garbage bill and the debate they were having.
Pelosi held it up for no good reason. We were already going to have additional spending.The democrats were not even debating oversight.
Tell the truth bruh. The bill had been worked on by both parties and Schumer had fundamentally agreed to it. Pelosi shows up with Schumer's nuts in her purse and rejects the Republican bill out of hand though it had been worked on and writes a new bill by inserting random garbage. She then prevents any type of discussion by filibustering 3 separate times.
Now you can have a reasonable conversation in the oversight provisions on the loans to be provided by the treasury department. I've already posted my personal preference. We both know the banks are in the best position to decide who is going to survive and who isn't. I don't want politicians with no expertise in business deciding who and how these loans are handed out. I don't like Treasury doing it either. If the banks, backed by the Treasury, are taking the risk they're more likely to decide what is best. Certainly not these morons in congress particularly by the democrat side as shown clearly in their garbage bill and the debate they were having.
There's no agreement when you haven't sat down with the group that runs the House of Representatives.The democrats were not even debating oversight.
Tell the truth bruh. The bill had been worked on by both parties and Schumer had fundamentally agreed to it. Pelosi shows up with Schumer's nuts in her purse and rejects the Republican bill out of hand though it had been worked on and writes a new bill by inserting random garbage. She then prevents any type of discussion by filibustering 3 separate times.
Now you can have a reasonable conversation in the oversight provisions on the loans to be provided by the treasury department. I've already posted my personal preference. We both know the banks are in the best position to decide who is going to survive and who isn't. I don't want politicians with no expertise in business deciding who and how these loans are handed out. I don't like Treasury doing it either. If the banks, backed by the Treasury, are taking the risk they're more likely to decide what is best. Certainly not these morons in congress particularly by the democrat side as shown clearly in their garbage bill and the debate they were having.
Because people with lupus and other diseases need these drugs for proven care, and morons are hoarding them for unproven treatments. He banned their use for COVID-19 outside of hospitals - if you go to the ER and the doctor wants to prescribe it to you, he or she can do so in Nevada. He didn't ban their use as treatment for the people who really need them.I just heard that the Nevada Governor banned/outlawed/stopped the use of this drug to treat Covid 19 patients. If true, how can that be? Is he/she a Dr?
There you go having to explain things to Millie again. She just doesn't understand plain English.Because people with lupus and other diseases need these drugs for proven care, and morons are hoarding them for unproven treatments. He banned their use for COVID-19 outside of hospitals - if you go to the ER and the doctor wants to prescribe it to you, he or she can do so in Nevada. He didn't ban their use as treatment for the people who really need them.
He made it so some idiotic doctor can't get 17 prescriptions for his family the next time they get the sniffles as a "preventive" measure or nonsense like that. That way if hospitals want them for COVID treatments, they have them, and the people who need to take it every day for autoimmune diseases also have them.
Because people with lupus and other diseases need these drugs for proven care, and morons are hoarding them for unproven treatments. He banned their use for COVID-19 outside of hospitals - if you go to the ER and the doctor wants to prescribe it to you, he or she can do so in Nevada. He didn't ban their use as treatment for the people who really need them.
He made it so some idiotic doctor can't get 17 prescriptions for his family the next time they get the sniffles as a "preventive" measure or nonsense like that. That way if hospitals want them for COVID treatments, they have them, and the people who need to take it every day for autoimmune diseases also have them.