https://www.foxnews.com/media/chris-wallace-robert-mueller-hearing-disaster-for-democrats
Well, just about anyone not suffering from TDS.
BAHAHAHAHA
Well, just about anyone not suffering from TDS.
BAHAHAHAHA
Who woulda thought?
- Thread starter 73 winch
- Start date
Seems to me he said Trump is guilty of crimes, what else did you think he could say? He wouldn't even talk about is financials.
He said he found Trump or no one on his team colluded with Russia.
It is over, as it has been for some time.
Mueller looked like a tired out of touch old man who didn’t have a clue what he was talking about. Kind of sad he was put in the position for both sides to be trying to use him to a political advantage
Like when he was asked if Trump “could be charged with a crime after he is not president “ and he said yes,,,,, of course he could be charged ,,anyone can be charged...they didn’t as him if Trump SHOULD be charged,,,the answer would have been no
How do you figure that? He also said today that Trump did not answer his written questions truthfully. That would mean he lied under oath when writing his answers.
Collusion is not a legal term NO ONE would have been 'charged' with that.
In Mueller's retirement speech, he said they never looked at Trump's financials.
But he also would not answer that question at the hearing. Not sure HE did, although thinks he did, but there are still ongoing investigations on the intel side of things.
He never said Trump was Guilty of any crime.
When asked if Trump COULD be charged he when he left office he said yes. Any citizen can be charged at any time. He never said Trump SHOULD be charged,,much less if he was guilty of anything.
Trump is the best thing that has happened to this country in 50 years
They can't or won't name specific crimes because Mueller doesn't cite any. They keep using things that could have happened as evidence something did happen.
They're too worried about their own job, but we all know Mitch won't let his folks vote to convict in the senate.
If there was a vote today in the senate about 1/3 of the Dens wouldn’t even vote to impeach. This is like talking about what color jerseys the Kansas Jayhawks are going to wear in the College Football Playoff next year.
Problem with that theory is that justice was that he was innocent. So since he was never found to have conspired with Russian govt people,,,any attempt to stop the investigation was promoting justice, not obstructing it
This all reminds of the “Webb could never hang with Rockhurst for 4 qtrs “threads from 12 years ago.
We all know how that turned out
What justice did he obstruct? What document was withheld? What witness did he not produce? What investigator did he fire? He COULD have done all that (and been within his LEGAL rights) but did NONE of it!
You have to have a crime to obstruct justice......what crime?
No because it would have been his coup de gras. Instead he hired his lackey Bill Barr to tarnish the facts of the report with a terrible spin.
I was thinking the same thing about you. For justice to be needed there has to be a crime. You can't obstruct justice (for that crime) if a crime hasn't been committed.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
I remember when kU* basketball could buy players but other teams couldn't- Latest: Veer2Eternity
-
-
