Libertarians are fence-sitters. No one really knows what they want. I did think they were close friends with Republicans and hated the commies. Not sure what this makes you.
Trump spends another 1.4 trillion
- Thread starter Veer2Eternity
- Start date
Veer2Eternity isn't a Libertarian, Liberal, or Conservative. He's a troll. Period.
Agreed. Anyone that thinks Clinton was indicted don't have all their oars in the water
Surely by now you guys know that it is DOJ policy that sitting president cannot be indicted. That is a term used in law. Clinton was impeached and was Not tepid in a court of law. He could have been removed by the senate for it but he wasn't. I still say that DOJ policy should be tested and let it run thought he courts and find out if a president can be held accountable by the legal system, not just the political system of impeachment.
Bingo!
Veer hates whatever someone else likes. Name one thing he supports that isn't hating something else. He NEVER takes a stand FOR anything.
A grand jury indicts. That is the role of the special prosecutor (as libs have pointed out constantly) who recommends charges to the prosecutor (the House in this formula) who decides whether to prosecute the indictment. If the indictment is determined to be prosecutable it goes to trial (the Senate).
Since you are Veer you will say there weren't any indictments because that is what you do so call it what YOU want to. Charges were brought against Bill Clinton and they were actual definable crimes. Those charges never mention sex either which was your claim to start this nonsense.
The house does NOT indict a president, they impeach him. The DOJ is not involved in impeachment and according their own self made rules they will not indict. Mueller had several instances of obstruction of justice in his report but could not indict.
Read again.
I didn't say the House indicts and never mentioned the DOJ.
Just curious though, what would be the difference in indicting and impeaching? Aren't they both referrals to trial?
So, what is the difference? What is the different effect? What is the different outcome?
You said it was 12 indictments. Educate yourself son.
And shut up when you don't know what you're talking about.
You were wrong. Learn from it for a change
What is the legal term for an accusation, impeachment, charge?
What is a formal written statement framed by a prosecuting authority and found by a jury (such as a grand jury) charging a person with an offense?
I said 2 indictments (unless you are responsible for hitting 2 side by side keys at once by accident).
As soon as I don't know what i'm talking about I will.
What i've learned (actually already knew but you've confirmed) is you are a troll who likes to divert rather than answer questions.
If there were CRIMES as specified in the Constitution, both could send you to jail or remove you from office.
Find obstruction of Congress and abuse of power in the law books.
There is no question you won't answer the question.
Such a coward.
It's not even diverting. He likes to ask "gotcha" questions that he knows the answer to, but will lead the discussion the way he wants it to go and then treat people like morons for answering the question even remotely wrong.
Answer him correctly and he shuts up and hides immediately. Trolls don't like the light.
Cowardly troll:
Answer the questions and THEN I will show you AGAIN.
I know his MO better than most do.
I've made him hide multiple times but he is dumb enough to think he can win next time.
Once again you do NOT need to have 'crime' as defined in the legal system to impeach a president. I ain't gonna tell you that again, just go find Lindsey Graham talking about the impeachment of Bill Clinton.
Thank goodness! I'm sick of hearing you be wrong.
Bribery, treason, other high crimes and misdemeanors. Where is the part in the Constitution that says anything else?
He is one of the most powerful guys in the senate whether you like it or not.
