This explains the Quack
- Thread starter Blizzard2.0
- Start date
But Hillary or Bernie are not in the white house. If you're not elected POTUS you can break the law. If you're a Democrat that's elected POTUS, we never know you broke the law.
Quack and side just want justice. Lol...Right.
Your memory is about as good as your boy Agent Orange. I pushed for Hillary' s gang to be investigated for the foundation nonsense for most of 2016. I posted links, articles and tweets out my bum tearing into Hillary's shenanigans, fake liberalism and corporate sponsorship. Countries paid the Clintons off via the foundation for special favors repeatedly. I was relentless. So shut up.
I will give you that Duck, you knew who Hillary was, that's more than some of your liberal friends on here cough (wcowherd) cough knew.
Congrats ol' man
I reckon since she pretty much funded the DNC she should have had a some say in who did what there. They should have been up front about it but no one else could raise the money to keep the DNC running so what is the complaint?
THIS.
The guys complaining about money are the ones defending Hillary!
She funneled money (money that would have been limited by campaign contribution limits) through the DNC in the form of state contributions into her pockets.
I will tell you this 3R. When people go to the polls thinking one candidate is inevitable, many of them dont want to waste their vote and they select the inevitable candidate.
The huge lead Hillary had when they started publishing the superdelegate counts made Hillary seem inevitable, even though those votes hadnt actually been cast yet. People saw the numbers.
In my opinion, that is a rigged system.
Super delegates should not even exist.
Publishing their numbers when dozens of states hadnt voted yet is BS. A significant portion of the superdelegates are lobbyists.
THAT is a rigged party. Add to that Hillary controlling the purse strings and having more support on all the cable news shows every night and it was a done deal long before the primaries.
That's not going to happen, because he isn't.
However, she did point out what a lot of us already knew, Hillary and the Democratic Party are the biggest, lying , lowlifes on the planet.
Maybe that's why they control the whole governme..............oh, wait
Well I hear Donna forgot to mention all this grand bargain Clinton got for supplying the DNC a bunch of money was ONLY for the general election NOT the primary, so NONE this DNC stuff means squat about the race between her and Bernie. She would have a lot to say about who did what if she became the nominee anyway. Duck you me and Nancy Pelosi all agree that 'super delegates' should not exist but they've been around a LONG time and nobody has done anything about it. Why is it a big deal all of a sudden? People that don't have gumption enough to go vote because they think it's decided shouldn't have a say in the outcome to start with. I vote in elections in the state of Missouri, and Butler County, all the time knowing my vote probably won't change the outcome to the one I want in most races but I go vote every time anyway!
Hillary had a large lead in superdelegates in 2008. That didn't stop Obama. This claim feels out of touch with what Obama did.
Two things can be true:
- The DNC was in the tank for Hillary
- The race wasn't close enough for this to have been the deciding factor because Bernie never showed any real ability to get enough votes from minorities. The Dem primary contest was not very close.
The biggest question I have is if Biden could have done it if he had ran, not would Bernie have won if there weren't superdelegates or if the DNC weren't in the tank for Clinton.
Berns close association to the Democratic Party makes it likely he's Anthony Wieners go-to guy.
Last edited:
No it's the anniversary of when Clinton got 3 million more votes than Trump but lost.
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Cleveland 24, Pittsburgh 19.....................BOSKO bites the dust!- Latest: hangmanbobbyjaggers
-