MFloyd, you should clean out your mouth, It appears you are part of the unfairness and your head is in the sand. Why don't you talk with the present Sikeston coaching staff about the Sikeston-Richland investigation ( Back in 2001 ) and who tried to make the kid ineligible but has a closed mouth about the Sikeston transfers to SCC today. MFloyd, you might educate yourself by doing your homework. If fairness was an issue back in 2001, why isn't fairness an issue today? Why isn't this same person trying to make these Sikeston transfers to SCC ineligible today. If we are in the " Kid Business back in 2001 " Why can't we be in the kid business today?
There's big news in this post
- Thread starter metro-dude
- Start date
MFloyd, you should clean out your mouth, It appears you are part of the unfairness and your head is in the sand. Why don't you talk with the present Sikeston coaching staff about the Sikeston-Richland investigation ( Back in 2001 ) and who tried to make the kid ineligible but has a closed mouth about the Sikeston transfers to SCC today. MFloyd, you might educate yourself by doing your homework. If fairness was an issue back in 2001, why isn't fairness an issue today? Why isn't this same person trying to make these Sikeston transfers to SCC ineligible today. If we are in the " Kid Business back in 2001 " Why can't we be in the kid business today?
MFoyd, Train and Barkley, I am into fairness for all, not just a few. Many small schools have dreams of winning a district or a sectional and only get that chance a few time in a 50 year period. I want Macks Creek, Meadville, Stanberry, Risco, Advance and Glasgow to have a chance @ that dream. I want a level playing field for all not just a few like the Sikeston-SCC situation. If this continues, Risco and others will not be able to fulfill their dreams.
I have been in gyms in Missouri who have banners of a second place finish in districts in their gym. They are proud of that district second place finish. I think of these small schools and I want them to have an opportunity when their time comes. Yes, Barkley, Train and MFloyd. I have more feeling of fair play as I travel thru life.
OK now I'm concerned. You either can't read or you can't comprehend what I've posted or you are choosing not to care. Why should I bother to respond if you just regurgitate the same crap over and over?
MFloyd you need to read the MSHSAA rules. A parent going to work for a district does not make their child automatically eligible if athlete already had played for another school, unless the entire family changes address. Exception would be if the family/school can prove a hardship.
I'm not sure of the actual rule or the language of it but I know that students that live in one town are always eligible if their dad or mom coach or teach at another school. This has always been the case. So maybe not "automatically" are they eligible but lets say "almost always" are they eligible. The case of these two SCC players fits this description to my understanding. Metro-dude wants me to go out and personally run surveillance. That's not my job. Believe me, we would love to have all these all-state players on our team and added the Bobby Hatchetts and Sherome Coles of the world.
