Did a little math, and someone might want to check this, but according to my math, out of 53 total innings in the WS....
Mets had a lead through 24 of them
It was tied after 16 of them
And Royals only led after 13 of them.
Does this speak to destiny, clutch hitting, statistical outlier, luck, or all of the above? I can't imagine a team winning the series in 5 games while being behind in the majority of innings played. Maybe it's more common than I think. Insight?
Mets had a lead through 24 of them
It was tied after 16 of them
And Royals only led after 13 of them.
Does this speak to destiny, clutch hitting, statistical outlier, luck, or all of the above? I can't imagine a team winning the series in 5 games while being behind in the majority of innings played. Maybe it's more common than I think. Insight?