Social Media: "oMg Th4t wuz TarGeTinG!!!"SEC REFS!!"
- Thread starter Veer2Eternity
- Start date
They big mad when it goes against them but that no call on assisting the runner that gave them a TD is not mentioned anywhere
It definitely was targeting. And as for the OL pulling the RB into the endzone - it was so obvious I assumed it was a different rule in college ball (it isn’t).
both should have been called but as was alluded to above:
People only cry about the calls (or no-calls) that go against who they are pulling for .
Say what you will about the rule, but the no call on targeting after reviewing it is one of the most egregious missed calls I've ever seen. It's either a rule or it isn't. You can't decide to call it sometimes and not call it others. One of the worst mistakes (which obviously wasn't a mistake since they had to purposely make the incorrect call) that I have ever seen and I am not exaggerating
That literally broke down nothing, Lol, the article says explaining why and then really didn't do that
You mean a call that happened 99.9% of the time throughout the rest of the season, isn’t called, and people were mad? Shocked. Arizona State walks out with a win and the SEC(Does Texas count now?) doesn’t have a team in the final four. We can’t have that.
Actually targeting reviews come back as no targeting more often than not. Hell on the UT interception ASU launches and uses forearm to head and neck area of UT receiver and they don't call targeting. Another non call that goes ASU way is their o lineman grabbing and flipping their RB into the endzone.
Anyone who thinks big 10 officials wanted Texas to play the winner of Oregon and Ohio st rather than ASU is using their heart and not their brain
