Can someone explain why Class 1 isn't the catch all? I'll admit I'm not a smart man, but the C5 catch-all has never made sense to me.
It was the way the majority of schools voted at the time.
I have an idea...why not do class 5 as catch all in one cycle and then one the next? What about putting the bottom 64 in one, next 64 in two. Top 32 in 6, next 64 in 5, next 64 in 4, and have class 3 the catch all? This is just one scenario but any class could be the catch all if you set it up that way...would really live up the system IMO.
I really don't care but what I do feel like is important is that we are giving schools similar chances. If you move the catch all it would move teams in classes a lot!! I think this would be nice. Many teams are stuck at the bottom of a class or some teams are fortunate to sit at the top of their class every single season knowing where the cut off is. This would eliminate that and create a lot of excitement as to classes and districts each year.
The only way to really increase parity in Class 1 is to move Valle up to Class 2 . Otherwise if Class 1 or Class 5 is the catch-all it won't make a lot of difference.
At the rate things are going the last few years we will soon be back to 5 classes with Class 5 and 6 being rolled back together.