Rand Paul is right

[bullitpdq68]

How many Americans have to die this year for you to admit killing the General was a stupid risk?

I won't to be honest, when you have had people close to you killed in the military at the hands of this man, I truly believe he got what he deserved.

 

[Veerman_12]

now that is relevant

It is. It establishes credibility and consistency. You don't care about "American lives", you're just politically opportunistic.

 

[Stop n Go]

question unanswered

He has already killed hundreds. Wounded thousands.

You're saying his killing was not justified?

 

[Veerman_12]

If you cared about American lives you would favor a universal health care system. So you are nothing more than a political hack yourself. You prefer to let kids die so your drug and insurance companies can keep their huge profits. You ain’t Jesus.

I never claimed to be. I have no issue with universal healthcare, I have an issue with who will have to pay for it.

 

[Veerman_12]

No. Didn’t say that. You keep stating false BS. Answer the question. How many more Americans must die before you will admit it was a huge mistake? Simple concept. Give me a number.

We've already established you don't care about American lives, why should anyone answer this hypocritical question?

 

[Stop n Go]

No. Didn’t say that. You keep stating false BS. Answer the question. How many more Americans must die before you will admit it was a huge mistake? Simple concept. Give me a number.

How many American's have died since his death?

Sounds like you're suggesting what I have stated. You don't think the killing was justified because you're worried about "future" killings that you have no clue will happen.

 

[Veerman_12]

Veer “let the kids die” Man. Fake follower of Jesus. Fake believer in the laws of the land, breaking out the abortion card on a daily basis.

You can toss out all the ad hominem red herrings you want, doesn't improve your position.

 

[Veerman_12]

claiming someone doesn’t care about American lives because they believe in a Supreme Court is decision is as tired and lazy as telling someone to go enlist for armed conflict. You can’t debate rationally so you “red herring” abortion. Tiresome and weak.

Not exactly, but whatever helps you avoid reality.

The mental gymnastics required to claim you're concerned about American lives and in the same breath say you don't care about other American lives just highlights your intellectual inconsistency.

Also, you respect a Supreme Court decision but deride an Executive decision? Both those decisions come from positions of authority and choosing to accept one but disregard or disrespect the other due to political convenience is the height of intellectual inconsistency.

It's ok to be a hypocrite, but at least own it.

 

[kaskaskiakid]

This thread is what is wrong in America. Too many people have bought into the Washington mentality of US vs. THEM. The lifetime politicians have us right where they want us. Their jobs are secure as long as they have their base hating the other side.

 

[Veerman_12]

This thread is what is wrong in America. Too many people have bought into the Washington mentality of US vs. THEM. The lifetime politicians have us right where they want us. Their jobs are secure as long as they have their base hating the other side.

No hate here. Not even remotely fired up. If anyone posting here has legitimate hate in their heart for anyone else on this board, they need to step away from the keyboard or put down the smartphone and seek help.

 

[Veerman_12]

Veerman, the pseudo intellectual, is using the Bush-Cheney “accuse them of something you are guilty of” method. He derided Obama for executive decisions and now he tries to say WE are the inconsistent ones because we trust a panel of 9 judges but not a lying conman.

Proof? I actually voted for Obama twice and would be quick to point out he used less Executive Orders than Reagan. Executive Orders are discretionary and even if you disagree with them the president has the right to use them.

As for the rest of your ad hominem response, proof?

 

[bullitpdq68]

question unanswered

Quit fighting under two names you fooling nobody.

 

[Nizmix]

If you cared about American lives you would favor a universal health care system. So you are nothing more than a political hack yourself. You prefer to let kids die so your drug and insurance companies can keep their huge profits. You ain’t Jesus.

No. But yes, he's not Jesus.

 

[Nizmix]

Veerman, the pseudo intellectual, is using the Bush-Cheney “accuse them of something you are guilty of” method. He derided Obama for executive decisions and now he tries to say WE are the inconsistent ones because we trust a panel of 9 judges but not a lying conman. I assume he is humoring himself by thinking he is a great debater and a superior follower of Christ, despite cheering the withholding of health care and food stamps from the poor. He loves Americans lives so, so much unless he is asked to chip in.

The only man to nuke men was affiliated with what party?

 

[Insideop]

Truman wouldn’t allow the CIA to murder dictators or overthrow the Iran government. That started under Eisenhower. Truman knew the can of worms it would unleash. Here we are 67 years later and still paying for that sin.

Um, you don't why WWI and II started? That's not helpful.

 

[bullitpdq68]

question unanswered

How is that a question unanswered. Yes you and your bother Trump have never sent anybody into battle for this country. I am sure it is easy for you to judge knowing none of your family or friends have been lost in battle.

But others of us know the sacrifice. A young man I coached as a youth was lost and I believe the man who cowardly hid behind a flag of another country and was responsible for his death deserved what he got. Hopefully this does not bring more war, but if that is what it takes then so be it.

 

[Veerman_12]

Lesson one: don’t fall into the trap of assuming people online have not lost someone in recent conflicts. Talking down to others like you are the lone ranger is nonsense.

Lesson Two: many of the people who have lost friends and family are completely against reigniting military battles right now and prefer diplomacy.

Look at that, we agree on something.

 

[bullitpdq68]

Lesson one: don’t fall into the trap of assuming people online have not lost someone in recent conflicts. Talking down to others like you are the lone ranger is nonsense.

Lesson Two: many of the people who have lost friends and family are completely against reigniting military battles right now and prefer diplomacy.

My look at the Pot trying to call out the kettle....LOL.

 

[Veerman_12]

My look at the Pot trying to call out the kettle....LOL.

I mean he's not wrong. Yes your individual loss is terrible, but it's not unique or terribly special in the grand scheme of things. This country has been at war for the last 20 consecutive years, everyone has loss. That doesn't minimize or marginalize your pain, but it doesn't give you the "high ground" so to speak.

 

[Nizmix]

When in doubt, play the abortion card.

Another update!
So far the opposite has happened in regards to a bazillion Dem. narratives.
Trumps USA winning. Dem gas light losers.....Farting sound.

 

[Bendtheknee]

Another update!
So far the opposite has happened in regards to a bazillion Dem. narratives.
Trumps USA winning. Dem gas light losers.....Farting sound.

So it is all over and we don’t have to worry any more. Thank god.

 

[bullitpdq68]

I mean he's not wrong. Yes your individual loss is terrible, but it's not unique or terribly special in the grand scheme of things. This country has been at war for the last 20 consecutive years, everyone has loss. That doesn't minimize or marginalize your pain, but it doesn't give you the "high ground" so to speak.

What? he is wrong! No high ground? What I am saying is I will not feel bad if this escalates because this man was killed. I answered his question! He is the one that kept pushing. Yes I did just put an emotional spin on it after he called me out again! However I went out and posted many things dated way before Trump ever took office that pointed to this man being responsible for many American deaths. General Patraeus even said they never had him on the X so they never had a chance to kill him, but they knew what he was doing and the deaths he was responsible for.

Petraeus is now saying Trump may have helped reestablish a deterrence by Killing Suleimani. If this turns out to be better than expected will he admit Trump was right?

 

[millerbleach]

Quit fighting under two names you fooling nobody.

How else can you claim to have people on ignore and not ignore them? He can save face while walking away to a "new" name anytime.

 

[Veerman_12]

Veerman, the pseudo intellectual, is using the Bush-Cheney “accuse them of something you are guilty of” method. He derided Obama for executive decisions and now he tries to say WE are the inconsistent ones because we trust a panel of 9 judges but not a lying conman. I assume he is humoring himself by thinking he is a great debater and a superior follower of Christ, despite cheering the withholding of health care and food stamps from the poor. He loves Americans lives so, so much unless he is asked to chip in.