You asked me to enlighten you. If you want to get into a game of semantics, so be it, but that is asking "why" for all intents and purposes.
Orange Nixon
- Thread starter Duck_walk
- Start date
You asked me to enlighten you. If you want to get into a game of semantics, so be it, but that is asking "why" for all intents and purposes.
STAR DATE 2020 - In the meantime, how about having the foresight to address the national debt we are leaving our children? That's real, and not chasing an imaginary enemy!! Waste of money!!
What part of "China and Russia are already setting their eyes on space" don't you understand? In 2015 Russia inacted their Space Force and China wasn't far behind them.
This isn't an "imaginary enemy" the threat from China and Russia is very real.
No one is Washington is serious about the national debt. That's reality and a non-starter in this debate, I wish it would be addressed, but it won't.
Bruh, Obama added 8.588 trillion to the national debt. A 74% increase from where it was when he took office!
Where were you then???
And trumpy is on pace to outspend Obama. The tax cut for the wealthy will cost $10 Trillion over 10 yrs alone. Biden will take care of the that, though.
No, he is not.
Trump plans to add $4.832 trillion to the debt in his first term.
That's a 24% increase from the $20.245 trillion debt at the end of Obama's last budget for FY 2017. If he remains in office for a second term, he plans to add $8.3 trillion for both terms.
Obama added $8.588 trillion, a 74% increase from the $11.657 trillion debt at the end of Bush’s last budget, FY 2009.
Crickets on the Russia, China threat...makes sense, chase an off topic red herring. Much easier to defend.
Twist the numbers all you want stopper, the tax cut alone is adding $1 Trillion per year!! And he campaigned on eliminating the debt!! Our course Mexico was going to pay for the wall, he had a healthcare plan the was beautiful and everyone was going to love, blah blah blah... continue spinning
I am not twisting any numbers. These are the figures that are out there. The tax cut is already factored into that amount.
Sorry this doesn't fit your agenda and you just can't accept them?
Lol you talk about spin, you can't credibly defend your anti-space program position because you recognize actual threats so you turn it into budgetary issues.
Deflect, deflect, deflect...
Remember who we are dealing with here, Veerman. A guy who loves to play the blame game and victim card but he didn't even vote last election.
My boogeymen who are actively seeking dominance in space? Who will have no qualms about shooting down our satellites and crippling our economy, our ability to defend ourselves, and our daily lives if we are unable to stop them from doing so?
The threat is real. Educate yourself if you don't believe me, but don't just plug your ears and say "Nuh uh" just because you don't like the messenger.
Ok, choose to be willfully ignorant then. You're old, hopefully you won't have to deal with it.
You're right...it's just a made up boogeyman with no basis in reality...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/5779315/russian-spacecraft-spy-satellite-space-force/?amp=true
And Martians could invade LMAO
https://www.zazzle.com/space_force_...8DcrzUcta9nCmYJRCE0KCPMkhKMtVQURoCwMAQAvD_BwE
https://www.zazzle.com/space_force_...8DcrzUcta9nCmYJRCE0KCPMkhKMtVQURoCwMAQAvD_BwE
Cute diversionary tactic. When you get proven wrong over and over you resort to jokes and trying to downplay how wrong you are.
You don't have to admit that you're wrong. Your deflections speak for you.
Big deal, so Russia was following one of our thousands of satellites, they haven't provoked us. You've proven nothing but you want to throw $$$billions at a fabricated threat with our present economy struggling. But by God, let's not worry about 15 million underfed children, families going bankrupt, or small businesses closing in our country, we need to arm ourselves for an potential space war with Russia , who doesn't want to go to war with us.
Good grief, beam me up Scottie, this idiotic conversation is over.
Good grief, beam me up Scottie, this idiotic conversation is over.
Lol get huffy because your shortsighted nonsense has been soundly refuted.
I don't blame you for being short sighted. If I was statistically likely to die in the next 20 years or so, I'd be focused on right now too.
As it is, if Russia or China develops a way to cripple us in space, a lot more than 15 million American children will go hungry.
Last edited:
Or course but little hypocritical to bash on Trump when you had no influence in that election.
Hopefully the candidate you’ll vote for will be awake and come out of his basement by then.
The big money bailouts in '08 were approved BEFORE Obama took office. You might remember he and McCain suspended their campaigns to return to Washington for the vote. You might also remember it was a VERY bipartisan vote!
You seem to want to forget the bailouts of '08 that were voted on a passed in a bipartisan vote BEFORE Obama took office.
Similar threads
