ADVERTISEMENT

ND over Virginia by 7. Boise over Virginia by 42.

Ucla isnt all that. Rosen is a media darling.

Rosen's numbers after the opening game are not good. I just know this. Boise totally outclassed Virginia. ND did not.

I wish we could outlaw polls until week 7 or so.
 
Last edited:
But ND is elite.

5 turnovers including interception for a touchdown on the very first play against Boise had a little to do with it. Virginia also had a bad call on intentional grounding in the endzone. Just one of those games nothing went right. Agree with FROG if ND runs the table they are more than likely in......
 
5 turnovers including interception for a touchdown on the very first play against Boise had a little to do with it. Virginia also had a bad call on intentional grounding in the endzone. Just one of those games nothing went right. Agree with FROG if ND runs the table they are more than likely in......

Did you watch the game as I did or just read the rundown? I just love hearing the opinion of someone who didn't see the line play and physical domination.
 
Did you watch the game as I did or just read the rundown? I just love hearing the opinion of someone who didn't see the line play and physical domination.


ND game yes Boise no. So your right, ND won but it shouldnt count because they didnt get 5 turnovers. Their line isnt as dominant nor is UCLAs so since they only scored 34 and 35 points they suck. Well Michigan must be freakin awesome because Boises only loss is to BYU whose getting smoked 31-0 to Michigan. Of course Im not watching that game either so who knows maybe Michigan has great line play and are showing physical domination unlike their Utah game I did watch. It was a bad game regardless of your excuse. 5 turnovers
 
ND game yes Boise no. So your right, ND won but it shouldnt count because they didnt get 5 turnovers. Their line isnt as dominant nor is UCLAs so since they only scored 34 and 35 points they suck. Well Michigan must be freakin awesome because Boises only loss is to BYU whose getting smoked 31-0 to Michigan. Of course Im not watching that game either so who knows maybe Michigan has great line play and are showing physical domination unlike their Utah game I did watch. It was a bad game regardless of your excuse. 5 turnovers

Comparing results on a one game scenario is silly IMO. Matchups matter. Over 4 or 5 games though it can tell some things
 
ND game yes Boise no. So your right, ND won but it shouldnt count because they didnt get 5 turnovers. Their line isnt as dominant nor is UCLAs so since they only scored 34 and 35 points they suck. Well Michigan must be freakin awesome because Boises only loss is to BYU whose getting smoked 31-0 to Michigan. Of course Im not watching that game either so who knows maybe Michigan has great line play and are showing physical domination unlike their Utah game I did watch. It was a bad game regardless of your excuse. 5 turnovers

I don't know why I waste my time with you.
What do you think caused the five turnovers? Pressuring the QB. Superior athletes. Knocking the snot out of the ball carrier. Having a swarming defense. Having discipline. Good god almighty. This is the last time I read your stupidity. You are now ignored. So don't bother posting.
 
Comparing results on a one game scenario is silly IMO[/B]. Matchups matter. Over 4 or 5 games though it can tell some things


DUCK READ AND COMPREHEND VEERs POST. Although im sure he didnt post to agree with me he does just that. Notre Dame is UNDEFEATED, Boise is not. So Boise gets after the QB a little more than Notre Dame does, congrats. NDs undefeated guessing Boise wishes they were. Your hate for the Domers grows with every Irish win...I think I love that more than Ice Cream.
 
DUCK READ AND COMPREHEND VEERs POST. Although im sure he didnt post to agree with me he does just that. Notre Dame is UNDEFEATED, Boise is not. So Boise gets after the QB a little more than Notre Dame does, congrats. NDs undefeated guessing Boise wishes they were. Your hate for the Domers grows with every Irish win...I think I love that more than Ice Cream.

I was agreeing.
I don't think ND is that good but they beat the crap they play.
 
I was talking to the Kansas D-bag.

Thats cute but as usual from you, petty. I said nothing against you personally just made a simple observation that they had 5 turnovers. You go on the attack as usual when someone makes a legit point. In case you missed it VEER agreed with me, he knows whom you were talking to. Just like in the WEBB Republic game. WEBB had 5 turnovers, they dont suck, they werent manhandled by a superior team, THEY PLAYED POORLY. It happens which is all I said in the first place. Get over yourself DUCK
 
But ND is elite.

Please let ND run the table and get into a major bowl against a good team just like a couple of years ago. Then the old joke can be recycled.
How many ND players does it take to change a flat tire? One, unless its a blow out, then the whole team shows up.
 
Please let ND run the table and get into a major bowl against a good team just like a couple of years ago. Then the old joke can be recycled.
How many ND players does it take to change a flat tire? One, unless its a blow out, then the whole team shows up.

Oh the irony if you're an MU fan. ND got beat by what, 20+ points by Bama in the NC? MU gets beat by that much by team(s) on a yearly basis. Yet you have no shame for making the SEC title game right?

Anybody who isn't a ND hater can see they play a schedule that is tough every year. They might not have that mighty SEC Least schedule(you know the one where Mizzou beat zero ranked teams and still won the conference division)
 
Oh the irony if you're an MU fan. ND got beat by what, 20+ points by Bama in the NC? MU gets beat by that much by team(s) on a yearly basis. Yet you have no shame for making the SEC title game right?

Anybody who isn't a ND hater can see they play a schedule that is tough every year. They might not have that mighty SEC Least schedule(you know the one where Mizzou beat zero ranked teams and still won the conference division)

Alabama 41- ND 14
Alabama 42- Mizzou 10.


Next.
 
Soooo, sagirin had ND SOS at 21 that year. Alabama at 19. #yourboy
 
Entertaining how ND is such a burr under your saddle. Historically, there is very little in common between Mizzou and ND. ND has stronger academics, better student profile, more athletic championships, arguably more high profile alumni, a larger by multiples endowment, a national following, their own television contract, etc.

Mizzou has had a nice little football run in the last 10 years or so, has a very good coach, sells out the stadium more often than not, has a nice campus, a good academic profile, and is in a financially nice position with its new conference. Why don't you enjoy your own positives? I'd be surprised if Mizzou was ever a topic on a ND board.
 
Entertaining how ND is such a burr under your saddle. Historically, there is very little in common between Mizzou and ND. ND has stronger academics, better student profile, more athletic championships, arguably more high profile alumni, a larger by multiples endowment, a national following, their own television contract, etc.

Mizzou has had a nice little football run in the last 10 years or so, has a very good coach, sells out the stadium more often than not, has a nice campus, a good academic profile, and is in a financially nice position with its new conference. Why don't you enjoy your own positives? I'd be surprised if Mizzou was ever a topic on a ND board.

ND is only a topic on every board in America because generations of fans have been brainwashed into believing there is some kind of mystique about them. NBC has been the most guilty. The media recruits for ND. And by the way based on several metrics used to measure these things, you completely over rate the academics at ND.
 
SEC is only a topic on every board in America because generations of fans have been brainwashed into believing there is some kind of mystique about them. ESPN has been the most guilty. The media recruits for SEC. And by the way based on several metrics used to measure these things, you completely over rate the academics in the SEC.
 
ND zero titles since 1988

SEC. Lotta.

Great post kenny.


One school versus a whole conference? Come on Veer your better than that. Are you only good if you WIN a National Championship? Having a very good record in multiple sports but not winning it all doesn't mean you don't have a great program.
 
Entertaining how ND is such a burr under your saddle. Historically, there is very little in common between Mizzou and ND. ND has stronger academics, better student profile, more athletic championships, arguably more high profile alumni, a larger by multiples endowment, a national following, their own television contract, etc.

Mizzou has had a nice little football run in the last 10 years or so, has a very good coach, sells out the stadium more often than not, has a nice campus, a good academic profile, and is in a financially nice position with its new conference. Why don't you enjoy your own positives? I'd be surprised if Mizzou was ever a topic on a ND board.
Mizzou has better looking women.

Ballgame.
 

I was agreeing.
I don't think ND is that good but they beat the crap they play.
If Nd is playing crap what exactly has Mizzou played the last 4 wks. Maybe the Tigers would like to play Central Methodist or Missouri Valley. I guarantee Mizzou is not a topic on the ND board.
 
One school versus a whole conference? Come on Veer your better than that. Are you only good if you WIN a National Championship? Having a very good record in multiple sports but not winning it all doesn't mean you don't have a great program.
Replying to kenny, peat. He used the SEC as an example.

BGI is easy trout. ND has played WHO that's any good? Ga Tech? Hhaaha they lost to duke. Umass? Texas? Uva? Please help me out here. I fail to see any legit playoff contenders on their schedule? How about mizzous?

Next private school powered failed argument.
 
Mizzou made it to the SEC championship game last year without beating a ranked opponent. #tough

Since 2013

National championships

FSU (1)
SEC (0)
 
If Nd is playing crap what exactly has Mizzou played the last 4 wks. Maybe the Tigers would like to play Central Methodist or Missouri Valley. I guarantee Mizzou is not a topic on the ND board.

I started this thread. It has nothing to do with Mizzou or the SEC. It was strictly about how over rated ND is year after year. It is frustrating how narrow minded, immature people turn every thread about college football into an attack on Mizzou. Discuss why ND is or is not over rated. Umass, Virginia, Ga. Tech, Texas. NONE of them are good teams right now. ND has beaten no one yet and should not be rated so high. This is exactly why I dislike them and their admirers.
 
Mizzou made it to the SEC championship game last year without beating a ranked opponent. #tough

Since 2013

National championships

FSU (1)
SEC (0)

And they got exposed ND style last year by OREGON HAHHAHAHA. That was pathetic.
Bama hung with OSU.

Mizzou ended up with an SOS of 10 while FSU was 21. That's why they were ranked behind Mizzou.

Before you say Arkansas lolz..what'd they do to texass in the bowl game?

Thank you for your interest in Mizzou sports
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT