There is absolutely no chance in hell that happens. Rays already said they want a bigger deal for Archer, alone, than they got for Garza.....which is how they got Archer
Don't want him at the cost they want. I'll take my chances what they have currently. Hell, there is a chance they could trade for Salazar.Cubs aint getting Archer, Bro.
Don't want him at the cost they want. I'll take my chances what they have currently. Hell, there is a chance they could trade for Salazar.
I'm fine wth the Heyward overpay. He doesn't hurt any future contracts, given that the key pieces are under control for a whileOther than overpaying Heyward the Cubs havent made many mistakes lately.
They have also been in a position where the farm system gave them loads of wins and payroll room. Player development has been exceptional to be sure. But the tougher decisions for the GM probably lie ahead when the core costs 50-75 M more a year.Other than overpaying Heyward the Cubs havent made many mistakes lately.
I seriously wonder what type of package it'd take to get Colome/Archer/Longoria. I know Longoria is a salary dump, and definitely not an attractive piece. Which I assume would lessen the haul for the Rays. But still have to think it'd be significant. I just have no idea what it is.
That's who I HOPE it is.Who do you think will be our 4th and 5th OFs in 2018? Bader and Jose?
That seems like a good guess right now, doesn't it? Surely Jose. And then they need someone who can play CF.Who do you think will be our 4th and 5th OFs in 2018? Bader and Jose?
You're getting a salary dump in Longoria. However, you're getting two pitchers with control for a while at a cheap rate.I seriously wonder what type of package it'd take to get Colome/Archer/Longoria. I know Longoria is a salary dump, and definitely not an attractive piece. Which I assume would lessen the haul for the Rays. But still have to think it'd be significant. I just have no idea what it is.
You're getting a salary dump in Longoria. However, you're getting two pitchers with control for a while at a cheap rate.
You're dumping the farm for that
3Archie would be here for 4 years minimum.
Not sure about Colome.
Archer has 4 years, $34M remaining with 2 additional club yearsArchie would be here for 4 years minimum.
Not sure about Colome.
Gimmie names that don't include Reyes. Weaver/Flaherty/Bader (Kelley) enough??? You have to throw in Gomber or Hudson too? I just have zero clue on stuff like this.You're getting a salary dump in Longoria. However, you're getting two pitchers with control for a while at a cheap rate.
You're dumping the farm for that
Tough to imagine it without one of the big 3 pitching prospects as a start. Two of them is probably too much. Probably somewhere in the middle, like Weaver/Bader/another Bader-level prospect like Gomber. They might also want a project like GrichukGimmie names that don't include Reyes. Weaver/Flaherty/Bader (Kelley) enough??? You have to throw in Gomber or Hudson too? I just have zero clue on stuff like this.
The first deal I'd be all in for. The second one, I'd struggle with. Which would tell me that I'm closer on the second than the first.
Just to be 100% level with youGimmie names that don't include Reyes. Weaver/Flaherty/Bader (Kelley) enough??? You have to throw in Gomber or Hudson too? I just have zero clue on stuff like this.
The first deal I'd be all in for. The second one, I'd struggle with. Which would tell me that I'm closer on the second than the first.
As long Pham and Fowler stay healthy you can rotate them in CF for days off.That seems like a good guess right now, doesn't it? Surely Jose. And then they need someone who can play CF.
I agree with Cards. Once you get beyond Colome I think the price will be too much for Gurst or MO or whoever is the deal maker to swallowJust to be 100% level with you
I don't think you ever see Archer without moving Reyes
But, just to try it out.....based somewhat on what the Cubs trade for Garza looked like, but you're going to have to deal more for Colome to be involvedGimmie names that don't include Reyes. Weaver/Flaherty/Bader (Kelley) enough??? You have to throw in Gomber or Hudson too? I just have zero clue on stuff like this.
The first deal I'd be all in for. The second one, I'd struggle with. Which would tell me that I'm closer on the second than the first.
I think Mo would not do that unless he got someone better than Archer. Being realistic here.Just to be 100% level with you
I don't think you ever see Archer without moving Reyes
Fowler is liable to spend 2 months on the DL, there needs to be some plan for another CF. Maybe that is the sixth OF from Memphis.As long Pham and Fowler stay healthy you can rotate them in CF for days off.
I agree with Cards. Once you get beyond Colome I think the price will be too much for Gurst or MO or whoever is the deal maker to swallow
I'm not talking Archer straight up. But in a package deal that also includes Colome just hitting Arbitration...... maybe Reyes stays, but you're throwing in an extra body from your top 10I think Mo would not do that unless he got someone better than Archer. Being realistic here.
That's way too much. Look at the Sale and Quintana trades for more recent examples.But, just to try it out.....based somewhat on what the Cubs trade for Garza looked like, but you're going to have to deal more for Colome to be involved
Flaherty, O'Neill/Bader(your pick), Perez, Grichuk & Kelly. That might get you a conversation going
Again, are we talking just Archer now?That's way too much. Look at the Sale and Quintana trades for more recent examples.
that's still way too much, Colome isn't that good and his value declines every year with arb awards.But, just to try it out.....based somewhat on what the Cubs trade for Garza looked like, but you're going to have to deal more for Colome to be involved
Flaherty, O'Neill/Bader(your pick), Perez, Grichuk & Kelly. That might get you a conversation going
Archer + Colome probably not more valuable than Sale.Again, are we talking just Archer now?
He's better than what you currently have and the Rays have no reason to move him. That is the issue you face.that's still way too much, Colome isn't that good and his value declines every year with arb awards.
I wouldn't trade Kelly straight up for Colome.
Yep. No doubt Fowler will miss time and I'm not sold on Pham for more than 130 games or him putting together a season like he did last year so anticipate the Memphis shuttle for Bader depending on where he is at on the number of times he can move .Fowler is liable to spend 2 months on the DL, there needs to be some plan for another CF. Maybe that is the sixth OF from Memphis.
There's still a lot of chatter that the Birds are strong on Wade Davis. I wonder if that affects their willingness to trade for Colome.
I think the bigger issue is actually Archer - there were a ton of relievers out there in FA. SP class is terrible. Cards can't be the only team who'd like someone like Archer.He's better than what you currently have and the Rays have no reason to move him. That is the issue you face.
And the guy had a 1.91 ERA with a sub 3 FIP in 2016. Was still respectable last season facing the AL East. He's not Jansen, but he's far from bad
The guys I listed above are not even remotely close to the same value as Moncada & Kopech.....And the Red Sox gave up more than thatArcher + Colome probably not more valuable than Sale.
Terrible?I think the bigger issue is actually Archer - there were a ton of relievers out there in FA. SP class is terrible. Cards can't be the only team who'd like someone like Archer.
Colome is less valuable in an offseason where teams could sign guys like Wade Davis, Yusmeiro Petit, etc.
I agree there is no Moncada, but Archer is no Sale.The guys I listed above are not even remotely close to the same value as Moncada & Kopech.....And the Red Sox gave up more than that
Kind of like Ducky is no VBI agree there is no Moncada, but Archer is no Sale.