I totally agree, to make class 1 64 teams is crazyI guess there will be another meeting soon but right now it will be 64 smallest in class 1 and 32 in class 6 and then class 2, 3, 4, 5 will split the rest of the teams. Class 5 had 35ish teams last year as the catch all but will have closer to 50 next year. The corresponding movement will effect all of class 2-5.
I’ll say this again - if they keep 64 in class 1, with all the schools going 8-man - and the smaller class 2 schools dropping down a class - it will encourage more schools to switch to 8-man.
There is a regulation that in class 2-5 that schools aren’t matched up with schools twice their size. But that will not be a factor in class 1. Personally, I think it should. If the smallest 11-man team has 94 in their three-class enrollment - then the biggest class 1 school shouldn’t have more than 188.
Personally, I think it should. If the smallest 11-man team has 94 in their three-class enrollment - then the biggest class 1 school shouldn’t have more than 188.
I don't see how they want class 1 be 64 if the highest class 1 school over 188? Class 1 will probably be catch-all
I agree, it will encourage more 8 man ball. Maybe that is what mshsaa wants?I guess there will be another meeting soon but right now it will be 64 smallest in class 1 and 32 in class 6 and then class 2, 3, 4, 5 will split the rest of the teams. Class 5 had 35ish teams last year as the catch all but will have closer to 50 next year. The corresponding movement will effect all of class 2-5.
I’ll say this again - if they keep 64 in class 1, with all the schools going 8-man - and the smaller class 2 schools dropping down a class - it will encourage more schools to switch to 8-man.
There is a regulation that in class 2-5 that schools aren’t matched up with schools twice their size. But that will not be a factor in class 1. Personally, I think it should. If the smallest 11-man team has 94 in their three-class enrollment - then the biggest class 1 school shouldn’t have more than 188.
That makes sense, but that is not what the regulation that was passed said.I don't see how they want class 1 be 64 if the highest class 1 school over 188? Class 1 will probably be catch-all