Middle-Out Economics
- Thread starter Buck Commander
- Start date
Divert.
Divert.
Divert.
You haven't answered ANY questions.
You have made blatantly false statements about the OP.
You have not cited a source.
You have not cited any study that supports your assertions.
You think i'm dumb........OK chief.
You are dumb.
What study would you like me to cite? It's basic math if you sit down and look at it.
YOU have made false statements about the OP, I'm just chalking that up to your inability to comprehend what you read.
I refuse to argue with an idiot (you). Either figure out what the OP actually says and come back with a rational argument, and I'd be happy to address you. Or keep making assumptions and assertions that are baseless, and you can talk to yourself.
You are the king of making posts something they aren't and I'm not playing your game.
miller
How is trickle down better?
I'll try to make this as simple as possible for you and you'll still screw it up I'm sure.
How is trickle down better?
I'll try to make this as simple as possible for you and you'll still screw it up I'm sure.
What is this, the 4th time you've said this after your promised "extended" absense?
When your on OP is quoted to show you are 100% false you just keep on insisting.
Re: miller
Then you claim you aren't raising taxes on the rich when your bullit point says otherwise.
Better than what????? You have a title for a plan with no plan other than to raise taxes on the rich and give it to the middle class in the form of a minimum wage hike whe the middle class doesn't make minimum wage!
Then you claim you aren't raising taxes on the rich when your bullit point says otherwise.
Re: miller
How does raising taxes on the rich, or anyone else anyone, give that money to the middle class or minimum wage workers? Do you know something the rest of us don't? Is the government using our tax dollars to pay wages for Mickey D's and other employers that pay minimum wage?
How does raising taxes on the rich, or anyone else anyone, give that money to the middle class or minimum wage workers? Do you know something the rest of us don't? Is the government using our tax dollars to pay wages for Mickey D's and other employers that pay minimum wage?
Re: miller
Buck said:
-Create a truly progressive tax system. The richest citizens and the largest corporations pay a little more so that middle-class citizens and small businesses get the support they need to thrive. Loopholes are closed so wealthy individuals and the most profitable corporations actually pay more.
Then he said:
I'm actually advocating for raising the minimum wage. Henry Ford method.
This post was edited on 9/6 9:11 AM by millerbleach
It doesn't! That's my point! Just repeating his (or whoevers) plan.
Buck said:
-Create a truly progressive tax system. The richest citizens and the largest corporations pay a little more so that middle-class citizens and small businesses get the support they need to thrive. Loopholes are closed so wealthy individuals and the most profitable corporations actually pay more.
Then he said:
I'm actually advocating for raising the minimum wage. Henry Ford method.
This post was edited on 9/6 9:11 AM by millerbleach
Re: miller
Do you have a white board to connect all your crazy?
Wow you must be a Glenn Beck fan, you make some strange connections. Because those were separate posts.
Do you have a white board to connect all your crazy?
Re: miller
You should work for the Obama spin machine since they never spin anything but just deny it was ever said or ever happened.
Re: miller
You say he resembles the plagues..you voted for shrub. So what's the difference besides obama is shrinking the deficit and didn't allow 9/11?
Re: miller
I don't see much difference other than the defense costs have shrunk greatly and terrorists are on the rise greatly. One likely leads to the other.
So, you do think it's good what Obama is doing?
I don't see much difference other than the defense costs have shrunk greatly and terrorists are on the rise greatly. One likely leads to the other.
Re: miller
Terrorists are not on the rise greatly, the names have just changed. Al Qaeda is so desperate to be in the news again they announced they will open up shop in India so someone would talk about them again. Now about that budget deficit. Do you believe it's dropping yet or are you still in denial?
Terrorists are not on the rise greatly, the names have just changed. Al Qaeda is so desperate to be in the news again they announced they will open up shop in India so someone would talk about them again. Now about that budget deficit. Do you believe it's dropping yet or are you still in denial?
Re: miller
If we didn't spend anything on defense we could eliminate it but I wouldn't call that wise. We haven't grown our way out of the deficit. If we had, that would be something to crow about.
Sure, it's dropping. Never said it wasn't.....denial?
If we didn't spend anything on defense we could eliminate it but I wouldn't call that wise. We haven't grown our way out of the deficit. If we had, that would be something to crow about.
Re: miller
The deficit was dropping before we left Iraq and by pretty large percentage so I'll that as still being in denial. Why would we want to keep spending gazillions on defense when we spend more than every other country on the planet combined. We could still do away with the Department of Home Security and save a LOT more. It is a very redundant agency.
The deficit was dropping before we left Iraq and by pretty large percentage so I'll that as still being in denial. Why would we want to keep spending gazillions on defense when we spend more than every other country on the planet combined. We could still do away with the Department of Home Security and save a LOT more. It is a very redundant agency.
Re: miller
There are a lot more cuts besides those that could be made.
I guess i'll need more than you saying so on the deficit improving before we started to withdraw or cut defense.
There are a lot more cuts besides those that could be made.
Re: miller
Hint: you're wrong.
That's why you are a lockstep GOPer.
You should get some numbers to back up your opinion.
Hint: you're wrong.
That's why you are a lockstep GOPer.
Re: miller
I'm sure there are many other cuts that could be made but Homeland Security would save a bundle it sure as heck is NOT an agency we need. We have several 3 letter agencies that been around for a long time to do what Homeland does.
I'm sure there are many other cuts that could be made but Homeland Security would save a bundle it sure as heck is NOT an agency we need. We have several 3 letter agencies that been around for a long time to do what Homeland does.
Similar threads
