ADVERTISEMENT

Lets all agree on something

Duck_walk

Well-Known Member
Oct 17, 2002
23,081
4,231
113
Seriously. This might be a P-incorrect statement. But are you telling me that Charlie Rose strips down naked in front of you and you are so selfish/stupid (worried about being employed in the future) that you dont tell everyone in the world???? Stop it.

That just blows my mind.
 
Agreed. All of these women, only coming forward now, are much weaker than the women in my immediate family. I can say beyond a shadow of any doubt, if Rose were to do what I've read about, it would be ass whooping time. Not only that but a guy that does that BS is mentally ill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: millerbleach
Good luck getting miller to agree with you. He argues gas prices if the other side posts something.
 
I know I will never watch another Steven Seagal movie, even on free TV. Sounds like he is worse than Rose and as sick as Weinstein.
 
Seriously. This might be a P-incorrect statement. But are you telling me that Charlie Rose strips down naked in front of you and you are so selfish/stupid (worried about being employed in the future) that you dont tell everyone in the world???? Stop it.

That just blows my mind.
What if, instead of selfish/stupid, it's a cold, calculated view on how the world worked for the last 50 years?

When you read the quotes in that article from nonaccusers like his former producer...it's pretty clear that everyone around him knew that something like this was going on.

There is no way CBS and PBS didn't know about this, yet there he was as a star of their news departments making a boatload of cash every year. What were women supposed to think? What media was running accusations like this even 5 years ago?

He got fired yesterday because of PR, not because it's the first time his boss ever heard of this.
 
I know I will never watch another Steven Seagal movie, even on free TV. Sounds like he is worse than Rose and as sick as Weinstein.
He has been an absurd jackhole for a long time. Beat his wife, pals around with weird people, the worst SNL host in history, the bizarre claim that he can't be choked out, etc. Sexual harassment is just the icing on the cake.
 
The same standard should be applied to all these cases. Evidence/proof of some sort to show things happened. Everyone is innocent until.........
The fact that these claims are all arising now shows women had little faith they would be believed but the women in my family wouldn't care and these women shouldn't have either or shouldn't care now if it actually happened.
 
The same standard should be applied to all these cases. Evidence/proof of some sort to show things happened. Everyone is innocent until.........
The fact that these claims are all arising now shows women had little faith they would be believed but the women in my family wouldn't care and these women shouldn't have either or shouldn't care now if it actually happened.
You don't know if the women in your family would care or not unless it has already happened to them and you now know this for a fact. They can't know until they are faced with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vbsideout
The same standard should be applied to all these cases. Evidence/proof of some sort to show things happened. Everyone is innocent until.........
The fact that these claims are all arising now shows women had little faith they would be believed but the women in my family wouldn't care and these women shouldn't have either or shouldn't care now if it actually happened.
The workplace is not a court of law. You’re not innocent until proven guilty. Having it be more likely than not that you are harassing people is a reasonable basis for action.

With rose, those emails inviting people to his house plus the comments from people who worked there about warning women who were one on one with him strongly suggests that it would be pretty easy for an employer to find the complaints to be credible.
 
The workplace is not a court of law. You’re not innocent until proven guilty. Having it be more likely than not that you are harassing people is a reasonable basis for action.

With rose, those emails inviting people to his house plus the comments from people who worked there about warning women who were one on one with him strongly suggests that it would be pretty easy for an employer to find the complaints to be credible.
Sounds like evidence to me. May not be indisputable but pretty convincing.
 
Well boys, it must be true if Duck found a tweet about it.

For the love of God Duck, can you not think for yourself?
 
Rachel Maddow

Stephanie Ruhle

Chris Matthews

Chris Hayes

Wolf Blitzer

Mica Brzynsky

Joe Scarborough

Willie Guist

Laurance O'Donnell

Chuck Todd

Brian Williams

Jimmie Kimmel

James Colbert
All think Roy Moore is guilty. So it must be true!
 
Rachel Maddow

Stephanie Ruhle

Chris Matthews

Chris Hayes

Wolf Blitzer

Mica Brzynsky

Joe Scarborough

Willie Guist

Laurance O'Donnell

Chuck Todd

Brian Williams

Jimmie Kimmel

James Colbert
All think Roy Moore is guilty. So it must be true!

When the pastor who was on stage with Roy Moore a few weeks ago now says he "persued" young girls. It must be fake news.
 
Rachel Maddow

Stephanie Ruhle

Chris Matthews

Chris Hayes

Wolf Blitzer

Mica Brzynsky

Joe Scarborough

Willie Guist

Laurance O'Donnell

Chuck Todd

Brian Williams

Jimmie Kimmel

James Colbert
All think Roy Moore is guilty. So it must be true!
Doesn't matter what they think, what do you think?
 
Doesn't matter what they think, what do you think?


Remember when Don Jr meeting with the Russians was fake news before he admitted it? And remember when the meeting was about adoption until the email was released? And remember when the nothing burgers became indictments? The Wash Po
just made up Watergate too. These people are clueless Joe Jackson.
 
When the pastor who was on stage with Roy Moore a few weeks ago now says he "persued" young girls. It must be fake news.
That hasn't really been in doubt. The pastor said it as a virtue to show Roy wanted (and found) a young woman who hadn't experienced the bad things most older women had. He used the word pure to explain Moores actions as virtuous. To you that is creepy and wrong. To many it's just smart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackKnightIron5
It's now smart to go for 14 year olds

Coming from a guy who said in his 30s considered a 17 year old because her parents said it was fine.

Yuuuuuuuuuuppppppp. This is 2017 MURICA
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neutron Monster
It's now smart to go for 14 year olds

Coming from a guy who said in his 30s considered a 17 year old because her parents said it was fine.

Yuuuuuuuuuuppppppp. This is 2017 MURICA
What evidence is there that he "went for 14 yr olds"?

Since you wish to make it personal, when did I say I "considered it"?
I know you like to lie but doing it when there is proof makes you a stupid liar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coachperk
What evidence is there that he "went for 14 yr olds"?

Since you wish to make it personal, when did I say I "considered it"?
I know you like to lie but doing it when there is proof makes you a stupid liar.
Oh, my bad

You thought it would have been fine to act on it. But because of your good, christ-like values..... you didn't act on a minor in your 30s

Bravo
 
Oh, my bad

You thought it would have been fine to act on it. But because of your good, christ-like values..... you didn't act on a minor in your 30s

Bravo

Still a liar. I guess you can't help it. You need help.
I never said anything about good christ-like values.
Her parents thought it was fine, even desired. I passed. Apparently I was more mature then than you are now. Jr high behavior is better than habitual lying but neither are desirable. You really should get help.
 
Still a liar. I guess you can't help it. You need help.
I never said anything about good christ-like values.
Her parents thought it was fine, even desired. I passed. Apparently I was more mature then than you are now. Jr high behavior is better than habitual lying but neither are desirable. You really should get help.
I lied, by repeating your post and then using your holier than thou attitude to explain why you said no. Cry some more, cupcake. Better yet, tell us more about how incredible you are for not dating a minor in your 30s.
 
About 25 years ago I was in my early 30s and some friends of mine had a daughter who was 17. I knew her from childhood. For some reason she took an interest in me that was more than family friend. I ignored it because even though she was attractive, intelligent, and respectable in every way, she was in my mind too young (and she was). Her dad one day pulled me aside and said I shouldn't let her age bother me! He said she was very mature and they thought I would be great for her. I still ignored it and it went away. I don't think it would have been inappropriate to have acted on that though since all involved had good motives.

I tell that story to show that if Roy Moore was well respected in the community he could have had legitimate reasons at that time and place to date teen girls. If someone looking back now doesn't appreciate Judge Moore, it could be used against him.

Legit reasons for you and Moore to date minors.


Legitimate.....reasons......to date teen girls
 
Legit reasons for you and Moore to date minors.


Legitimate.....reasons......to date teen girls
Excuse me fan for answering out of turn.
#1.To be lectured by the Democrats and media elite on this issue is beyond laughable. The Legion of Dems, feigning moral horror makes me sick to my stomach. A 30 year old dating a 16 year old is the height partisanship that only the deepest of hypocrites can turn into the worst thing on earth.
#2. While I am uncomfortable with the thought of dating a teen in your 30s the partisan media is using alleged behavior that can't meet the simplest markers of credibility, to annihilate a human being stinks of the same smell made over gun control, abortion, Trump, seven year old gender changes, school lessons about homosexuality, and men in the ladies room.
#3. At the time of Moores search, the legal age was 16. Not only was it legal, it didn't violate the social mores of the province.
#4. The 14 year old that claims he molested her is the most credible story and perhaps the worst, but unless you prove it with an eyewitness or video I will write it off as another lie, that dirty politics uses as an alternative to electing the best candidate.
.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: millerbleach
#1.To be lectured by the Democrats and media elite on this issue is beyond laughable. The Legion of feigning moral outrage makes me sick to my stomach. A 30 year old dating a 16 year old is the height partisanship that only the deepest of hypocrites can turn into the worst thing on earth.
#2. While I am uncomfortable with the thought of dating a teen in your 30s the partisan media is using alleged behavior that can't meet the simplest markers of credibility, to annihilate a human being stinks of the same smell made over gun control, abortion, Trump, seven year old gender changes, school lessons about homosexuality, and men in the ladies room.
.

The media and liberals are annihilating a guy who has been impeached from 2 government jobs already? Riiiiight. Moral outrage like when Obama didnt wear a flag pin once? Or when he wore a brown suit?
You are morally outraged by everyone except Orange boy who is the biggest lying piece of trash to ever hold office in this country.
Clintons, Trumps and Blizzard. Three of a kind.
 
That hasn't really been in doubt. The pastor said it as a virtue to show Roy wanted (and found) a young woman who hadn't experienced the bad things most older women had. He used the word pure to explain Moores actions as virtuous. To you that is creepy and wrong. To many it's just smart.

Your trying to rationalize molestation is truly sickening.
 
The media and liberals are annihilating a guy who has been impeached from 2 government jobs already? Riiiiight. Moral outrage like when Obama didnt wear a flag pin once? Or when he wore a brown suit?
You are morally outraged by everyone except Orange boy who is the biggest lying piece of trash to ever hold office in this country.
Clintons, Trumps and Blizzard. Three of a kind.
You hyperventilate about silly allegations regarding any topic, You really are a desperate little man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: millerbleach
You hyperventilate about silly allegations regarding any topic, You really are a desperate little man.

Your outrage over their outrage is exactly what they want. Tool. Mueller in the mean time is laying low with no leaks, preparing to really drain the swamp. I cant wait to read your excuses when he drops the next indictment bombshells.
 
Your outrage over their outrage is exactly what they want. Tool. Mueller in the mean time is laying low with no leaks, preparing to really drain the swamp. I cant wait to read your excuses when he drops the next indictment bombshells.
Yawn.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT