ADVERTISEMENT

Kaep just killed Nike

Tough to admit you were wrong, huh.
Nike is going strong after you and the other racists predicted otherwise. Duck owns you.

liberalshout-racism-300x227.jpg
 
Kane you are going to be one of the prize winners................so is bullittpdq. Those are my first hints. They will be gift cards mailed out (privacy always assured) along with the NWCMO Pick Em ones in time for the holidays!
 
Yeah and I am analyzing veerman and ALL the doc guys. From here on out, though, I want a favor: when a political thread appears in the Football section please GIF 'em up............the more the merrier. And that includes if yours truly ever screws up and posts one!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RawMeat
Pigs in a blanket fry like bacon. What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want them? Now..............
Let's not forget (oh Lord here I go help me) who shot Steve Scalise..........and who he supported.
 
Let's not forget (oh Lord here I go help me) who shot Steve Scalise..........and who he supported.

Mr. Hannity, sir? Please keep this on the radio. It's beneath you to post on a high school sports forum.
 
Mr. Hannity, sir? Please keep this on the radio. It's beneath you to post on a high school sports forum.
The whole point is THIS does not belong on a high school sports forum! Are you telling me I cannot have an opinion.............and by the way I am not a Hannity fan at all. THIS belongs on the political crap forum.............but thanks for playing.
 
The whole point is THIS does not belong on a high school sports forum! Are you telling me I cannot have an opinion.............and by the way I am not a Hannity fan at all. THIS belongs on the political crap forum.............but thanks for playing.

Dude. I am just joshing about. A joke ceases to be funny when it's explained, but I'll explain it anyway just for the sake of clarification. To wit: You said a couple of things that are exact talking points of the aforementioned radio/TV host, whether in jest or in seriousness, who knows, but that actually doesn't matter. The joke was that he (the radio/TV host) was posting on this board, when in fact it was actually you! Now what's not funny about that? And, just to be completely, metacognitively clear, that last question was also a subtle joke about the non-funny nature of the joke before.
Also, just so everyone here knows, the "thanks for playing" thing doesn't actually mean you've "won," an argument, if that's the goal, anyway. Of course, in this situation there was no argument to "win," since I was only joking around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_utvqikut1knht
Dude. I am just joshing about. A joke ceases to be funny when it's explained, but I'll explain it anyway just for the sake of clarification. To wit: You said a couple of things that are exact talking points of the aforementioned radio/TV host, whether in jest or in seriousness, who knows, but that actually doesn't matter. The joke was that he (the radio/TV host) was posting on this board, when in fact it was actually you! Now what's not funny about that? And, just to be completely, metacognitively clear, that last question was also a subtle joke about the non-funny nature of the joke before.
Also, just so everyone here knows, the "thanks for playing" thing doesn't actually mean you've "won," an argument, if that's the goal, anyway. Of course, in this situation there was no argument to "win," since I was only joking around.
I did not initiate the thread. THAT is the root cause of the whole deal...............nobody is trying to win an argument, either. I just want it to go where it belongs............the Political Crap forum. Have a quality Friday, veer.
 
I did not initiate the thread. THAT is the root cause of the whole deal...............nobody is trying to win an argument, either. I just want it to go where it belongs............the Political Crap forum. Have a quality Friday, veer.

Good call, thank you, sir.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_utvqikut1knht
Dude. I am just joshing about. A joke ceases to be funny when it's explained, but I'll explain it anyway just for the sake of clarification. To wit: You said a couple of things that are exact talking points of the aforementioned radio/TV host, whether in jest or in seriousness, who knows, but that actually doesn't matter. The joke was that he (the radio/TV host) was posting on this board, when in fact it was actually you! Now what's not funny about that? And, just to be completely, metacognitively clear, that last question was also a subtle joke about the non-funny nature of the joke before.
Also, just so everyone here knows, the "thanks for playing" thing doesn't actually mean you've "won," an argument, if that's the goal, anyway. Of course, in this situation there was no argument to "win," since I was only joking around.
30652371931_70aac107ef_o.gif
 
I did not initiate the thread. THAT is the root cause of the whole deal...............nobody is trying to win an argument, either. I just want it to go where it belongs............the Political Crap forum. Have a quality Friday, veer.

The title of this board is “Football”.
Kaep was a “football” player who took his team to a Super Bowl, which is a “football” game. The controversy surrounding Kaep occurred because of his actions during pregame of a “football” game. There were several posts by various mosports posters criticizing Kaep because of these actions and I don’t recall you complaining about them. Those posts were followed up by other posts criticizing and predicting doom for Nike because of their use of Kaep in a commercial in which he is clearly a “football” player. You didn’t complain then either. Now that I point out how wrong people were about nike’s demise for using said “football” player you whine like our president.
 
The title of this board is “Football”.
Kaep was a “football” player who took his team to a Super Bowl, which is a “football” game. The controversy surrounding Kaep occurred because of his actions during pregame of a “football” game. There were several posts by various mosports posters criticizing Kaep because of these actions and I don’t recall you complaining about them. Those posts were followed up by other posts criticizing and predicting doom for Nike because of their use of Kaep in a commercial in which he is clearly a “football” player. You didn’t complain then either. Now that I point out how wrong people were about nike’s demise for using said “football” player you whine like our president.
giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_utvqikut1knht
The title of this board is “Football”.
Kaep was a “football” player who took his team to a Super Bowl, which is a “football” game. The controversy surrounding Kaep occurred because of his actions during pregame of a “football” game. There were several posts by various mosports posters criticizing Kaep because of these actions and I don’t recall you complaining about them. Those posts were followed up by other posts criticizing and predicting doom for Nike because of their use of Kaep in a commercial in which he is clearly a “football” player. You didn’t complain then either. Now that I point out how wrong people were about nike’s demise for using said “football” player you whine like our president.

Nike isn't interested in him for his ability to play football. He got his Nike deal after the NFL decided he was no longer worth the headache.

Meaning your post is of a political nature, with nothing really to do with football.

images
 
Nike isn't interested in him for his ability to play football. He got his Nike deal after the NFL decided he was no longer worth the headache.

Meaning your post is of a political nature, with nothing really to do with football.

images
Duck understands less about politics and patriotism than he does about football, and that’s not easy
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT