ADVERTISEMENT

Judge better give Kyle his rifle back

So where did you stand on the rioters at the Capitol after 50+ court cases said there was no evidence of voter fraud?
And before you ask I don't believe either of these situations was right. Also nor were the rioters and looters, but those that were shot were not rioting or looting. The fact the judge let them be called that is a disgrace to the legal system.
If anyone violated our capitol building or any representative they should be prosecuted to the fullest. With that said, we have enough cameras and security there if anyone did anything they would have been prosecuted. Especially with a Democratic run government. My post was to question the cries for "Karma" to be the rule for the way we conduct ourselves.
 
We can only hope. I will chip in for their legal defense.
Clearly your true colors and black heart are showing....wanting harm to come to a young man who defended him person against a Child Rapist, attempted murder and a convicted felon illegally wielding a gun in a effort to kill him. You truly are anti-American and hate the idea that the System actually worked and that the Law's where upheld. Sad and a bit disgusting.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MIZZOU71
Skate boards and plastic bottles are scary.



You do know that Clubs and such kill way more than AR-15 right....oooppps you don't
 
Three people were shot. Not one. The judge “ended the trial” before it started.

He was the attacker and aggressor...they should of not raised a human piece of garbage as a son. He got what he had coming to him. Rittenhouse the victim the 2 killed and one shot the Thugs.
 
Kyle crossed state lines, got a powerful gun and shot three people. At least one of them was chasing him BECAUSE he shot someone.
If you think that makes him a hero and worthy of your defense, you are a sad mofo.

if he was obviously not guilty it wouldn’t have taken three and a half days to draw that conclusion. Obviously some had to have their arms twisted to agree with the verdict. He is a POS and anyone defending him is a POS.
It took that long because the Jury was scared of the Leftist mob going crazy that is a well established fact.

He went across state lines to help, he actually administered aid and was Maced in the face and did not respond with violence. It was only after he was threatened did he react. He clearly needed the gun for his protection from the Democratic Left wing thugs. Cause they was having none of him trying to help and put out fires. He legally could own that fire arm for protections as all citizens should.

You are one sick and warped person who sides with Child Molesters, Violent offenders and Felons. And believes the out right lies of the MSM ...




 
You can live vicariously thru your George Zimmermans and your Kyle Rittenhouses. But in your heart you know, if they hadn’t had a gun with them, no one would have died at either location. Those people wouldn’t have even looked at Kyle if he wasn’t packing that weapon. He wasn’t asked to be there. He had no authority. He wasn’t even old enough to be carrying that weapon.
Yes he was old enough to carry a weapon and yes anyone who threatens a armed person should expect to get shot and die. Don't threaten...don't act thuggish and move along and you live. That is the way it should be.

And no you are 100% wrong in your hubris of thinking no one would of died if he didn't have a weapon .....they had threatened verbally to kill him and then attempted to Kill him with a gun...a Deadly Club and a Jump Kick as well....All of those things kill people on a Daily bases. What type of Person ignores statistical reality? OH you do your that type of person.....



Also he was asked to be there by the owners of the car lot....get your information straight. He was asked to be there he had the legal right to be there Period, He could legally carry and own that weapon, and he could legally and willfully kill criminal's who attacked his person. You are not right about any of this....

See what you don't get is that he was found not guilty because he DIDN'T do anything wrong!! The Punk Molester, Violent attempted Murder and Felon are the criminals and The two that died deserved their deaths.
 
Maybe in your eyes he is old enough. Maybe in the judges eyes. But having taught thousands of 17 year olds, I know he wasn’t.

Justice wasn’t served but hopefully Karma will be out on the streets for Kyle one day.
Thank the heavens that you don't get to decide anything about legally matters ....... Your sample size is small and a statistical zero and clearly a twisted biased based opinion at a best.

Justice was 100% Served and really you taught children and you want Harm to Come to a young person who did everything in his power to avoid getting beaten and killed!!!

I'm being serious have you ever sought psychiatric help? If you truly feel this way!! I hope that is just some Hyperbolic Trumpesque statement......Rittenhouse is a true innocent...the others are the Criminals as their records and actions clearly show. And you want harm to come to him???
 
  • Like
Reactions: hb1025
So where did you stand on the rioters at the Capitol after 50+ court cases said there was no evidence of voter fraud?
And before you ask I don't believe either of these situations was right. Also nor were the rioters and looters, but those that were shot were not rioting or looting. The fact the judge let them be called that is a disgrace to the legal system.
I stand on arrest and prosecute them legally and fairly.....those who acted like dumb arse thugs...get the whole book thrown at them...those walking around like Buffoons taking selfie's and twittering get fined and community service.
 
I have been following even less, I am just asking a question.
Here is a analysis of how thing went down...pretty close to what the jury got but the jury got more footage and in greater detail with better resolution and even FBI drone footage all of which proved his innocence. Not to mention the prosecutions witnesses testimony ended up proving Rittenhouses innocence.






Clearly the issue is that a Average citizens can be armed and take action to protect their person against the Jack booted Leftist doing the bidding of those in control.
 
You literally swallow whole hog and share anything that supports your chosen narrative. What an easy mark for the disinformation propagandists. The only people who died there that night were shot by Kyle Rittenhouse. A punk scum bag.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HomeyR
When the judge would not allow the video of scumbag Kyle outside the cvs saying if he had his AR he would be picking those people off, he guaranteed the results of the trial.

He treated Kyle as his client. The video showed this kids state of mind. He was carrying that weapon for one reason. He dreamed of getting to shoot someone that night. No one else died. Just his victims.

Ever had your picture taken giving the white supremacy sign in a bar with a proud boy?
scumbag Kyle has.
 
Yes he was old enough to carry a weapon and yes anyone who threatens a armed person should expect to get shot and die. Don't threaten...don't act thuggish and move along and you live. That is the way it should be.

And no you are 100% wrong in your hubris of thinking no one would of died if he didn't have a weapon .....they had threatened verbally to kill him and then attempted to Kill him with a gun...a Deadly Club and a Jump Kick as well....All of those things kill people on a Daily bases. What type of Person ignores statistical reality? OH you do your that type of person.....



Also he was asked to be there by the owners of the car lot....get your information straight. He was asked to be there he had the legal right to be there Period, He could legally carry and own that weapon, and he could legally and willfully kill criminal's who attacked his person. You are not right about any of this....

See what you don't get is that he was found not guilty because he DIDN'T do anything wrong!! The Punk Molester, Violent attempted Murder and Felon are the criminals and The two that died deserved their deaths.
He didn't own the weapon, he borrowed it from a friend.
 
Kyle crossed state lines, got a powerful gun and shot three people. At least one of them was chasing him BECAUSE he shot someone.
If you think that makes him a hero and worthy of your defense, you are a sad mofo.

if he was obviously not guilty it wouldn’t have taken three and a half days to draw that conclusion. Obviously some had to have their arms twisted to agree with the verdict. He is a POS and anyone defending him is a POS.
So you think a dollar an hour raise is worth more than her health care coverage?
 
You literally swallow whole hog and share anything that supports your chosen narrative. What an easy mark for the disinformation propagandists. The only people who died there that night were shot by Kyle Rittenhouse. A punk scum bag.
Well they were attacking an innocent citizen and deserved to die so duh
So you think a dollar an hour raise is worth more than her health care coverage?
we offer good insurance through our company. They don't want to pay the premiums. Keep increasing government welfare nobody will want to work
 
You literally swallow whole hog and share anything that supports your chosen narrative. What an easy mark for the disinformation propagandists. The only people who died there that night were shot by Kyle Rittenhouse. A punk scum bag.
You can literally find out in a rather quick manner the thugs criminal record. You clearly are the easy mark....your sources are Twitter and tik tok. You can also without much effort find the unedited video showing the whole time line. It was entered into public record during the court case.
 
When the judge would not allow the video of scumbag Kyle outside the cvs saying if he had his AR he would be picking those people off, he guaranteed the results of the trial.

He treated Kyle as his client. The video showed this kids state of mind. He was carrying that weapon for one reason. He dreamed of getting to shoot someone that night. No one else died. Just his victims.

Ever had your picture taken giving the white supremacy sign in a bar with a proud boy?
scumbag Kyle has.
That video was not from that day.....and isn't it ironic you literally hope and wished for him to die and would actively pay for those who did so defense even with him being a innocent person.....and then you call him out for saying he wishes that some thief's at a CVS could be shot by him as being admissible as to his state of mind or intent days later. Jeez everyone with a smidge of judicial knowledge understands that off handed comments like that are not worth spit because people say stuff like that all the time.

He didn't even know who those people where.....Get your facts straight.
 
Last edited:
He didn't own the weapon, he borrowed it from a friend.

Nope the gun was just stored at his friends house...his friend purchased it for him using Rittenhouses money....hence the gun was his. He was going to get it once he turned 18 years old.
 
That video was not from that day.....and isn't it ironic you literally hope and wished for him to die and would actively pay for those who did so defense even with him being a innocent person.....and then you call him out for saying he wishes that some thief's at a CVS could be shot by him as being admissible as to his state of mind or intent days later. Jeez everyone with a smidge of judicial knowledge understands that off handed comments like that are not worth spit because people say stuff like that all the time.

He didn't even know who those people where.....Get your facts straight.
Dude. Do you ever think that other people might know more than you on some subjects? There have been many, many cases that have allowed such videos as evidence. I actually ran that by a defense attorney (my nephew who seldom agrees with me) and he gave me examples of such.

No one said it was that same day. You make for many an unpleasant conversation.
 
Well they were attacking an innocent citizen and deserved to die so duh

we offer good insurance through our company. They don't want to pay the premiums. Keep increasing government welfare nobody will want to work

Nope the gun was just stored at his friends house...his friend purchased it for him using Rittenhouses money....hence the gun was his. He was going to get it once he turned 18 years old.
He was not 18 at the time so I guess it was NOT his.
 
Dude. Do you ever think that other people might know more than you on some subjects? There have been many, many cases that have allowed such videos as evidence. I actually ran that by a defense attorney (my nephew who seldom agrees with me) and he gave me examples of such.

No one said it was that same day. You make for many an unpleasant conversation.
Yes...a lot of people know more than me on a lot of subjects. The issue is that most of what is posted on here is easily and quickly refuted. And when it comes to the law it can be very specific on things that are admitted into court. As I stated before one of my 3 degree's is in Criminal Justice...so I do have a bit of insight into this.

And How do I make for a unpleasant conversation you are the person who is always throwing out Barbs and backhanded comments. I just put forth information with receipts to back it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MIZZOU71
He could legally own and carry.....could not purchase. But I guess that is splitting hairs.
If you can't legally buy it how is it legal to won and carry it? We do have some strange laws on the books. o_O
 
If you can't legally buy it how is it legal to won and carry it? We do have some strange laws on the books. o_O
Simple answer and it's in the law......if a Adult want's to buy a Child a Rifle for protection or hunting or target practicing etc. and give it to them to posses then it's legal.

Examples:eek:f reason's why....Let's say your Mom/Dad's a Truck driver, in the Military, Traveling salesman etc. on gone from home a lot. So you buy your Child a gun for home protection and train them up on it. Or maybe your Child is a big time hunter or into target/skeet shooting and you purchase said gun for them to use for that recreation. If it's not legal for them to own and carry how are they suppose to use it in those situations?

See there is a whole lot of reason for this law and the exemptions. A 17 year old on his own can't just roll into a place and purchase a firearm.....but a Adult of good standing can for the reason's mentioned above purchase said firearm and gift/give it to them to posses and carry.

It's literally not very complicated.....I got my First Shotgun at age 13 yrs and my First Deer Rifle at 16yrs old. I'd say that use to be the Norm in a lot of area's....

Also you will note handguns can't be carried by those under 18 yrs of age. I have zero issue with this law.
 
What does that Meme have to do with this situation.....Literally the Constitution allows people the right to Bear Arms. For you to suggest that the Fundamental right of self defense and preservation of one's life .....for thuggish Criminals ...is in someway related to Slavery, Racism, or the Fight for equality is disgusting and of course do you straw man much in your spare time!
 
  • Like
Reactions: MIZZOU71
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT