I think the allegations are explosive and the Rs should be condemning potential involvement of hostile foreign governments in our election, but it's not like there's any evidence Trump and Manafort had anything to do with it.Is this Trump and Manafort's Watergate?
Russia owns Trump. The more that comes out the worse he will look (and not really on this petty issue).I think the allegations are explosive and the Rs should be condemning potential involvement of hostile foreign governments in our election, but it's not like there's any evidence Trump and Manafort had anything to do with it.
Dude, no offense, but what is a bigger deal, the Democratic party working on behalf of an American who is a member of their party to win an election or one of our biggest enemies working to try to stop an American from being elected because they believe that is in their interest? Think for a second. The latter is far more explosive and important.wait a minute, the democratic establishment is caught red handed trying to put the fix in on the primary process, but somehow its Trump that has an issue??
They are crying cause they got caught cheating, they get everything coming to them
It is bizarre how pro-Putin that Trump and his team are.Russia owns Trump. The more that comes out the worse he will look (and not really on this petty issue).
Follow the money boys.
If "throwing" an election is seeing if someone will ask Bernie about his religion in the South, then your definition needs some work.I believe 100% that Russian intelligence was probably behind it ( or their surrogates )
But to believe that Trump had anything to do with it is beyond stupid.
And yes I think what the democrats did was worse. I expect the Russians to do everything they can to screw with us ( hell Obama did everything he could to defeat Bibi)
I would hope that a party in our country would not try to throw an election for our president, I expect a hell of a lot more from our people than I do the Russians. Apparently that's not the case!!!
You need to reread what I wrote. I said the DNC did not throw the election. I did not say what they tried to do was right.Spin and deny
If the DNC intentionally tried to sway voters to support Hillary over Bernie is the problem.
Not who exposed their unethical behavior.
Do democrats EVER take responsibility?
Is there ANYBODY with a functioning brain that thinks Hillary didn't know about it?
Outside enemies are expected to undermine our elections, we shouldn't have to worry about our own parties doing it.
You need to reread what I wrote. I said the DNC did not throw the election. I did not say what they tried to do was right.
Why can't both things be a problem? It's not that hard.Spin and deny
If the DNC intentionally tried to sway voters to support Hillary over Bernie is the problem.
Not who exposed their unethical behavior.
Do democrats EVER take responsibility?
Is there ANYBODY with a functioning brain that thinks Hillary didn't know about it?
Outside enemies are expected to undermine our elections, we shouldn't have to worry about our own parties doing it.
Why can't both things be a problem? It's not that hard.
Since when are outside enemies supposed to undermine our elections? Can you name a single time this has ever happened before? This is unprecedented and astonishing. Both parties should be furious. This is far more important than anything in the DNC emails.
"we should expect our enemies to do so but it has never happened before" - don't you see how this viewpoint is incoherent? It's not like this is the first time we have ever had enemies. We should most certainly not expect it. It is not normal. It should be vigorously opposed by any sane political party.I did not say they were supposed to undermine our elections, I said as enemies, we should expect them to do whatever they can to cause us harm. They are our enemy, it should be expected. We should not however, expect our own political parties to undermine our elections.
I cannot off the top of my head site an example where a foreign entity changed or harmed our political process, but I would find it hard to believe it hasn't happened.
."we should expect our enemies to do so but it has never happened before" - don't you see how this viewpoint is incoherent? It's not like this is the first time we have ever had enemies. We should most certainly not expect it. It is not normal. It should be vigorously opposed by any sane political party.
The Democratic party can nominate whoever it wants to be President. It is your choice to vote or not vote for whomever comes out of whatever process they select in November. That's the election.
I'm not gasping in disbelief. I'm pointing out the deafening silence from one of our major political parties on Russia. its candidate four years ago claimed Russia was our #1 enemy..
I did not make the above statement. We should not expect our enemies to try to harm us?
You are the one that said it hasn't happened before, not me.
Once again, you are deflecting and denying the corruption in our own political parties, while you gasp in disbelief that our enemies would want to hurt us.
As you stated before, we can admit it is a terrible situation on both accounts.
I think the allegations are explosive and the Rs should be condemning potential involvement of hostile foreign governments in our election, but it's not like there's any evidence Trump and Manafort had anything to do with it.
hillary can say Russians but she can't say Islamic Extremist![]()
Lol not even close to what anyone is saying. Thanks for trying though. I know how hard it is for you to think about a complex situation. If it doesn't involve guns you can't figure out where to stand.Lol @ the thought process by a few of you. It's Russia's fault the DNC is corrupt.
Because Trump is not aggressive or strong on Russia!I see Cowherd and NM found out what the spin is!
First, we don't KNOW Russia is behind this.
Second, why would Russia want Trump (the more aggressive and strong) over Hillary?
3rd, it's WHAT they leaked not WHO leaked it.
4th, there will be much more.
Uh, because Trump is strangely infatuated with Putin?Second, why would Russia want Trump (the more aggressive and strong) over Hillary?
Obama didn't consistently praise Iran. Trump consistently praises Putin and other dictators.Didn't Obama say he would sit down with Iran and other nations and try a different approach to working out our differences back when he was running for President in 08? How is Trumps approach to Russia any different? Not saying I agree with his approach but I also did not agree with Obama's in 08.
He didn't pretend their leaders are awesome people. His point was that Bush acted as if war and antipathy were the only approaches to relations with other countries, and that he was going to take a more rational approach.Didn't Obama say he would sit down with Iran and other nations and try a different approach to working out our differences back when he was running for President in 08? How is Trumps approach to Russia any different? Not saying I agree with his approach but I also did not agree with Obama's in 08.