Usually it's AOC not Biden that blurts out what Democrats are really thinking.
I love HW and son, the comments are priceless.
I love HW and son, the comments are priceless.
Usually it's AOC not Biden that blurts out what Democrats are really thinking.
I love HW and son, the comments are priceless.
It's going to crack me up when Trump gets 15-20% of the black vote.
LMAO gloating about hoping for 15% of black America's support
...I'm more worried about russia again
You're funny in a sad sorta way.That's some funny stuff there.
Unhinged, deranged and divorced from reality...but still funny in a sad sorta way.
LMAO gloating about hoping for 15% of black America's support
No way he picks up 15%, trumps No Blacks Allowed policy and lawsuit from trump properties will be brought up again, and blacks will see who is the real racist if they have forgotten.
You are also failing to recognize a much larger voter turnout with the anti trump vote. Count on it!!
The turnout is going to be lower in the next election. It was probably going to be so before WuFlu. Even more so now. Nobody is excited about voting for Biden. Much like last election there is a fair segment of the population that doesn’t like Trump but will vote for him anyway because the alternative is Biden.No way he picks up 15%, trumps No Blacks Allowed policy and lawsuit from trump properties will be brought up again, and blacks will see who is the real racist if they have forgotten.
You are also failing to recognize a much larger voter turnout with the anti trump vote. Count on it!!
We shall see, long way to go and a lot can happen, without a doubt Biden is in a better position than he was 4 months ago.
I believe all the premature anointing on here is from the trumpettes choir.
Biden led in the polls before he was even in the race and I don't recall seeing any poll that shows him behind Trump yet.#Bidenisracist and #YouAintBlack were just trending on Twitter yesterday. It took economic collapse (which could improve by late October) and an unavoidable global pandemic to "improve" Biden's chances.
Just wait until he has to speak in public regularly again.
Let's wait to see who he picks as a running mate before anointing him.
Biden led in the polls before he was even in the race and I don't recall seeing any poll that shows him behind Trump yet.
That sounds familiar...hmmmm.
Polls at this point are for idjuts anyway.
Here's a flashback for you forgetful folks, although it was much closer to the 2016 election than we are now in 2020.
Better start practicing your skyscreaming.
Another opinion.yawn. 2016 has literally no relation to 2020. This is a new ball game. College educated women will swarm the polls like cicadas on November 3rd and boot the orange orangutan like a rotten jack-o-lantern 4 days after Halloween
The "right thing" is a very subjective thing. It depends on what you think this country should be and how it should be run. I don't care what the name is or what party they come from, a guy like Trump is not fit for the 'office' of POTUS!!!
The "right thing" is a very subjective thing. It depends on what you think this country should be and how it should be run. I don't care what the name is or what party they come from, a guy like Trump is not fit for the 'office' of POTUS!!!
Also a subjective opinion. What happened to the idea that judges were impartial and used only the law and constitution for their opinions?I think his Supreme Court appointments will help direct this country in the right direction for the next 50 years. Hopefully he gets another term and is able to appoint 2 more Supreme Court Justices.
This country will be in good shape for the rest of my life if he does.
Law and Constitution is the right direction and the direction of Trumps appointees to date. I fail to see the conflict in Veermans post. Maybe you could point it out?Also a subjective opinion. What happened to the idea that judges were impartial and used only the law and constitution for their opinions?
Also a subjective opinion. What happened to the idea that judges were impartial and used only the law and constitution for their opinions?
You seriously need to retire from posting on here before you hurt yourself even more, bud.Also a subjective opinion. What happened to the idea that judges were impartial and used only the law and constitution for their opinions?
So there is no such thing a conservative activist?Judges are impartial. Having said that they're also human. I'd rather have a conservative Justice than some liberal activist.
I feel just fine but thanks for your concern.You seriously need to retire from posting on here before you hurt yourself even more, bud.
So there is no such thing a conservative activist?
Of course there is, but a "conservative justice" by definition is one who follows the Constitution and that is not activism.
A "progressive justice" by definition wants the Constitution to be a living document and wants to create and change law from the bench = activism.
It's really simple.
Bingo.
3R will attempt to twist that or act like he doesn't understand (maybe he doesn't, who knows?)
I'm gonna give 3R the benefit of the doubt on this one, pretty sure after he reads my well-presented and inarguable logic he will concede the point and join us in our effort to re-elect The Donald!
That makes no sense. You admit they can be activists but they ONLY go by the constitution in strict fashion?Of course there is, but a "conservative justice" by definition is one who follows the Constitution and that is not activism.
A "progressive justice" by definition wants the Constitution to be a living document and wants to create and change law from the bench = activism.
It's really simple.
You bet I'm all about electing Trump again!I'm gonna give 3R the benefit of the doubt on this one, pretty sure after he reads my well-presented and inarguable logic he will concede the point and join us in our effort to re-elect The Donald!
That makes no sense. You admit they can be activists but they ONLY go by the constitution in strict fashion?
Also a subjective opinion. What happened to the idea that judges were impartial and used only the law and constitution for their opinions?
That makes no sense. You admit they can be activists but they ONLY go by the constitution in strict fashion?