True true true see your president for proof.No one loses their job over embellishing news.
True true true see your president for proof.No one loses their job over embellishing news.
Who was the last reporter to lose their job because they got the story wrong?That's crap and you know it. Anonymous sources are not fake. Depending on the reporter, an anonymous source can be trusted, because they want to do the right thing, but they don't want to lose their job.
Name the ten along with sources, please.Who was the last reporter to lose their job because they got the story wrong?
It just doesn't happen. I can cite easily 10 reports that were false easily and none lost their jobs.
Let's start with an easy one, who lost their job for reporting "hands up don't shoot"?
Wow still demanding we find information for you!Who was the last reporter to lose their job because they got the story wrong?
It just doesn't happen. I can cite easily 10 reports that were false easily and none lost their jobs.
Let's start with an easy one, who lost their job for reporting "hands up don't shoot"?
The editor allowed it without proper sourcing yet still is there. Why?Wow still demanding we find information for you!
It doesn't happen. Here is one where probably had we had a functioning press secretary this would not have happened. Reporter was fired for writing a story about what Trump would be doing on Thanksgiving. When they kept it a secret what he would be doing on Thanksgiving., but hey "it just doesn't happen."
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...ed-for-trump-thanksgiving-story-blames-editor
WOW you are amazing. I am supposed to find that for you.The editor allowed it without proper sourcing yet still is there. Why?
How about the one I mentioned? There are MANY more.
WOW you are amazing. I am supposed to find that for you.
I found you one and you didn't even admit you were wrong.
Why should a reporter be fired for interviewing a witness at the scene who lied?
If we are going to start firing reporters for that, FOX news won't have anyone working there.
Every time DJT stands in front of a camera they are interviewing a liar.
If they reported it as witnesses are saying that wouldn't be a problem. When you report it as fact that is much different.WOW you are amazing. I am supposed to find that for you.
I found you one and you didn't even admit you were wrong.
Why should a reporter be fired for interviewing a witness at the scene who lied?
Still waiting (since Tuesday night) for you to “easily name 10 who haven’t been fired.” Maybe not as easy as you thought? Perhaps conveniently ignoring me in hopes that I’d forget?If they reported it as witnesses are saying that wouldn't be a problem. When you report it as fact that is much different.
https://newspunch.com/fake-news-stories-cnn/
Sally Kohn said that “thousands of Americans are marching in New York and Washington and across the country, demanding a justice system that applies the same to everybody and honors our values, and we want you to know our hearts are out there marching with them.”
This isn’t the first time CNN’s Kohn has repeated the claim that Michael Brown had his hands up before being shot:
Sally Kohn
✔@sallykohn
Many allegations swirling re #FergusonShooting. Only sure facts, according to police, is Mike Brown was unarmed and fleeing with hands up.
I guess if you count the underling reporter being fired, I was wrong. If you look at the name reporters who have been completely wrong and not fired, i'm not wrong.
derangement is when you find out you are worshiping a false god and you refuse to believe the truth.
Let's look at what everyone else posts shall we?
Duck: Anti-trump rhetoric, tweets, insults.
SadButTrue: Anti-trump rhetoric, insults.
3R: CNN talking points
MoscowMitch: Insults, anti-Trump rhetoric
And yet you ONLY call me out? News flash, I'm on your side on this issue. Trump goes to war with Iran and there is ZERO chance I vote for him. I try to be respectful to others, but people kind of get what they give, so yeah I fall short there sometimes. At least I'm willing to admit it.
Exactly, miller, if you want to hear the truth, Trump never lies....oh wait....my bad!!
That's crap and you know it. Anonymous sources are not fake. Depending on the reporter, an anonymous source can be trusted, because they want to do the right thing, but they don't want to lose their job.
If this a fake story, then why fight so hard to keep the records from being released. If he was a legit businessman, why not just prove it.
WOW you are amazing. I am supposed to find that for you.
I found you one and you didn't even admit you were wrong.
Why should a reporter be fired for interviewing a witness at the scene who lied?
If we are going to start firing reporters for that, FOX news won't have anyone working there.
Every time DJT stands in front of a camera they are interviewing a liar.
If you think trump"s lying needs to be proved you are dumber than a rock.
I used to do this (ask questions) and someone told me to stop it and now I see that same someone gave you a like for ... asking questions. HmmmI just ask questions. You'll never hear me say anyone else is wrong, but I will ask them to defend their assertions. What's wrong with that on a discussion board?
The like was given by Mrs Miller. She has the hots for veerman_12.I used to do this (ask questions) and someone told me to stop it and now I see that same someone gave you a like for ... asking questions. Hmmm
If you don't want to talk about the Michael Brown case, who got fired in the Nicholas Sandman case?Depending on the reporter, an anonymous source can be trusted, because they want to do the right thing, but they don't want to lose their job.
https://www.newsweek.com/journalist...ton-catholic-high-school-students-has-1299930If you don't want to talk about the Michael Brown case, who got fired in the Nicholas Sandman case?
The Jury must have missed CNN apologies and publicized story retractions. Funny how these mistakes keep benefiting one side.And I gave you an answer to Michael Brown, and same with Sandmann, they reported the facts aft the time, after more digging the truth came out, that is the 24 hour new cycles now, but don't let reality get in the way of your conspiracies.
What Jury? There are retractions and corrections all over the web, but that doesn't fit the narrative conservatives want to imply.The Jury must have missed CNN apologies and publicized story retractions. Funny how these mistakes keep benefiting one side.
The facts changed???? You mean the truth overwhelmed the reported story.And I gave you an answer to Michael Brown, and same with Sandmann, they reported the facts aft the time, after more digging the truth came out, that is the 24 hour new cycles now, but don't let reality get in the way of your conspiracies.
You must have missed the one about Sandmann, but hey don't ever admit you were wrong.The facts changed???? You mean the truth overwhelmed the reported story.
The story was reported wrong (on the left amazingly) and no one got fired in either case.
Agreed. Oh yea, they just gave in and said they were wrong. Rrright.The facts changed???? You mean the truth overwhelmed the reported story.
The story was reported wrong (on the left amazingly) and no one got fired in either case.
Agreed. Oh yea, they just gave in and said they were wrong. Rrright.
They totally backpedaled, refused to retract, never apologized and then settled. They viciously attacked him and if he were an adult his life would still be in ruins. He's lucky he's not been hurt by people that did something. Now he's rich, more 24 hour security but rich. . #Justice
To save time, we should just stipulate that the left is intolerant and any DNC news outlet is a lie.The rude, disrespectful little bastage is not rich. The amount was not disclosed. His lawyers probably got a decent wad of cash but that pathetic little punk is going to have to get a job like the rest of you slobs.
Wrong??? Who got fired? I may have missed it.You must have missed the one about Sandmann, but hey don't ever admit you were wrong.