DOJ has two investigations ongoing

[Blondiee]

Into the origin of the Mueller investigation into claims that Trumps campaign was working with the Russian govt.

Since the detailed two year investigation by the best and brightest at the DOJ and FBI could find absolutily no evidence

How in the world could the FBI ever claim they had enough solid evidence to begin an investigation of a duly elected president???

In Central America it’s called an attempted coup,,,,,hopefully when these two investigations are done a lot of people go to jail so this never happens again

 

[3Rfan]

Into the origin of the Mueller investigation into claims that Trumps campaign was working with the Russian govt.

Since the detailed two year investigation by the best and brightest at the DOJ and FBI could find absolutily no evidence

How in the world could the FBI ever claim they had enough solid evidence to begin an investigation of a duly elected president???

In Central America it’s called an attempted coup,,,,,hopefully when these two investigations are done a lot of people go to jail so this never happens again

Could be because of what Manafort was doing. One could assume reasonably Trump knew and condoned his actions.

 

[millerbleach]

Could be because of what Manafort was doing. One could assume reasonably Trump knew and condoned his actions.

Evidence? We don't assume people are guilty we prove they are. You CAN assume anything.

 

[millerbleach]

The libs are really grasping at anything they can pretend is serious but this could actually produce convictions related to Russia and the election just not the ones they HOPED upon hope to produce with their witch hunt they propped Mueller up in front of.

 

[3Rfan]

Evidence? We don't assume people are guilty we prove they are. You CAN assume anything.

You surely have to 'think' someone is guilty of a crime when you START an investigation.

 

[DirtyDan17]

You surely have to 'think' someone is guilty of a crime when you START an investigation.

Or you just hate someone so much that you begin a 3 year fishing expedition trying to find a criminal offense.

 

[millerbleach]

You surely have to 'think' someone is guilty of a crime when you START an investigation.

Investigations are started because of accusations. Investigations are dropped all the time for lack of evidentiary support. You said reasonably assume Trump was involved in a crime not Trump was accused. There is a huge difference in believing a crime could have been committed and believing one was committed. The investigation is to see if a crime was committed not because of evidence but because of accusation. A charge is made if there is evidentiary proof. Trump hasn't been charged with anything.

 

[3Rfan]

Investigations are started because of accusations. Investigations are dropped all the time for lack of evidentiary support. You said reasonably assume Trump was involved in a crime not Trump was accused. There is a huge difference in believing a crime could have been committed and believing one was committed. The investigation is to see if a crime was committed not because of evidence but because of accusation. A charge is made if there is evidentiary proof. Trump hasn't been charged with anything.

You guys are just plain ridiculous when it come tp Trump. I'm quite sure you DO know according to some goofy DOJ standard a sitting president CAN'T be charged. I still have NO idea why that is since I've never heard of that being in the constitution but that's what they go by.