ADVERTISEMENT

Class 6 - High quality wins.

JNreturns

Well-Known Member
Aug 1, 2016
4,700
1,860
113
Kansas City, MO
DeSmet - 2

#153 Christian Brothers (St. Louis, MO) (42-14),
#796 Chaminade (St. Louis, MO) (32-31)
No one else in the top 1000

Liberty North - 5 (Four wins better than DeSmet's second best win)

#243 Park Hill (Kansas City, MO) (24-3)
#278 Staley (Kansas City, MO) (24-12)
#571 Blue Springs (MO) (31-14),
#700 Lee's Summit North (Lee's Summit, MO) (23-21)
#879 Lee's Summit West (Lee's Summit, MO) (31-0)


CBC - 3

#103 Winton Woods (Cincinnati, OH) (42-31)
#501 Edwardsville (IL) (44-27)
#796 Chaminade (St. Louis, MO) (56-26)

Joplin - 2

#316 Webb City (MO) (35-28),
#865 Carthage (MO) (56-55),

Ray Pec - 4
#571 Blue Springs (MO) (41-29),
#700 Lee's Summit North (Lee's Summit, MO) (17-14),
#700 Lee's Summit North (Lee's Summit, MO) (35-23),
#879 Lee's Summit West (Lee's Summit, MO) (28-21)

Park Hill - 3
ROck - 2
Howell - 0
Blue Springs - 2
Marquette - 0

 
DeSmet - 2

#153 Christian Brothers (St. Louis, MO) (42-14),
#796 Chaminade (St. Louis, MO) (32-31)
No one else in the top 1000

Liberty North - 5 (Four wins better than DeSmet's second best win)

#243 Park Hill (Kansas City, MO) (24-3)
#278 Staley (Kansas City, MO) (24-12)
#571 Blue Springs (MO) (31-14),
#700 Lee's Summit North (Lee's Summit, MO) (23-21)
#879 Lee's Summit West (Lee's Summit, MO) (31-0)


CBC - 3

#103 Winton Woods (Cincinnati, OH) (42-31)
#501 Edwardsville (IL) (44-27)
#796 Chaminade (St. Louis, MO) (56-26)

Joplin - 2

#316 Webb City (MO) (35-28),
#865 Carthage (MO) (56-55),

Ray Pec - 4
#571 Blue Springs (MO) (41-29),
#700 Lee's Summit North (Lee's Summit, MO) (17-14),
#700 Lee's Summit North (Lee's Summit, MO) (35-23),
#879 Lee's Summit West (Lee's Summit, MO) (28-21)

Park Hill - 3
ROck - 2
Howell - 0
Blue Springs - 2
Marquette - 0


Lol you have a weird obsession. No one is reading your post. You do know that NO ONE thinks that Ray Pec nor Liberty North is winning anything no matter how much you post about the alleged strength of schedule??
 
It's going to be interesting to see how KC does in Class 6. From the outside, it looks like all of the KC teams are just average and no team is great, especially offensively. Most of the games are close and pretty low scoring. Then Rockhurst lays it to CBC and Blue Springs South whips Holt and it makes you wonder if they're all good, especially defensively.
I have no idea what to think of them. I guess we'll just have to see how it all plays out.
 
DeSmet - 2

#153 Christian Brothers (St. Louis, MO) (42-14),
#796 Chaminade (St. Louis, MO) (32-31)
No one else in the top 1000


Liberty North - 5 (Four wins better than DeSmet's second best win)

#243 Park Hill (Kansas City, MO) (24-3)
#278 Staley (Kansas City, MO) (24-12)
#571 Blue Springs (MO) (31-14),
#700 Lee's Summit North (Lee's Summit, MO) (23-21)
#879 Lee's Summit West (Lee's Summit, MO) (31-0)


CBC - 3

#103 Winton Woods (Cincinnati, OH) (42-31)
#501 Edwardsville (IL) (44-27)
#796 Chaminade (St. Louis, MO) (56-26)

Joplin - 2

#316 Webb City (MO) (35-28),
#865 Carthage (MO) (56-55),

Ray Pec - 4
#571 Blue Springs (MO) (41-29),
#700 Lee's Summit North (Lee's Summit, MO) (17-14),
#700 Lee's Summit North (Lee's Summit, MO) (35-23),
#879 Lee's Summit West (Lee's Summit, MO) (28-21)

Park Hill - 3
ROck - 2
Howell - 0
Blue Springs - 2
Marquette - 0
So are you saying Jones and Co. will win state?
 
Lol you have a weird obsession. No one is reading your post. You do know that NO ONE thinks that Ray Pec nor Liberty North is winning anything no matter how much you post about the alleged strength of schedule??

He’s all silly projections, no bite. He has nothing.
 
Nothing? Liberty North has beaten more high-quality teams than anyone in the state. That's nothing to you? If it is, you are a moron.
Try reading knuckle dragger. Didn’t state a thing about your projections individually. Brushed them aside as a whole. They mean nothing. Games are decided on the field. I shouldn’t have to state common sense, but you do need it apparently.
 
Try reading knuckle dragger. Didn’t state a thing about your projections individually. Brushed them aside as a whole. They mean nothing. Games are decided on the field. I shouldn’t have to state common sense, but you do need it apparently.
He's not making projections? He's talking about wins...... in real games..... that were actually decided on the field......
 
KC: Blue Springs, Blue Springs South, Liberty, Rockhurst, Lees Summit West, Lees Summit will all tell you they are down. Park Hill offense is a mystery. Lees Summit North will tell you they thought they would be better than this.
After a few down years Ray Pec and Liberty North are returning to form and having good years. Could that be because of the down years the others are having?
Unless Staley wins, I think KC could be shut out again.
 
He's not making projections? He's talking about wins...... in real games..... that were actually decided on the field......

That don’t tell you what’s going to happen in the future. Past games don’t dictate future games. This is a post about previous criticism he’s received about using calpreps to prove his points about KC schools. Not everything is black and white. Captain obvious.
 
That don’t tell you what’s going to happen in the future. Past games don’t dictate future games. This is a post about previous criticism he’s received about using calpreps to prove his points about KC schools. Not everything is black and white. Captain obvious.
You are unreal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: revno
That don’t tell you what’s going to happen in the future. Past games don’t dictate future games. This is a post about previous criticism he’s received about using calpreps to prove his points about KC schools. Not everything is black and white. Captain obvious.
Go back and read the post slowly, or have someone read it to you... This is a list of quality wins. No projections, no guesses, hell, not even any mention of future games. Just a list of games that were played on the field, settled on the field, and won on the field, and then listed with the scores from those specific games.

I do applaud you though. Making JN look like the sane poster is challenging, yet you do it consistently well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: revno and MIZZOU71
Go back and read the post slowly, or have someone read it to you... This is a list of quality wins. No projections, no guesses, hell, not even any mention of future games. Just a list of games that were played on the field, settled on the field, and won on the field, and then listed with the scores from those specific games.

I do applaud you though. Making JN look like the sane poster is challenging, yet you do it consistently well.

None Of that determines who wins in the future. That’s the only argument I’m making. But by all means continue.
 
He’s all silly projections, no bite. He has nothing.

None Of that determines who wins in the future. That’s the only argument I’m making. But by all means continue.

Try reading knuckle dragger. Didn’t state a thing about your projections individually. Brushed them aside as a whole. They mean nothing. Games are decided on the field. I shouldn’t have to state common sense, but you do need it apparently.

Yeah, and you made the argument up with yourself? Literally no one else said anything else about projections. That was all you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: revno and MIZZOU71
Yeah, and you made the argument up with yourself? Literally no one else said anything else about projections. That was all you.

This isn’t the only post, or the only post this conversation has been had on. This is a follow up to previous arguments. You shouldn’t comment on things you don’t know about. I’m still making a point you aren’t apart of. Ok boomer?
 
This isn’t the only post, or the only post this conversation has been had on. This is a follow up to previous arguments. You shouldn’t comment on things you don’t know about. I’m still making a point you aren’t apart of. Ok boomer?
You haven't made a valid point since you joined, but by all means, do what ya gotta do I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: revno and MIZZOU71
You would have to put one hell of a convincing, fact based, scheme and personnel analyzing argument to me before I would bet against Jones this year
 
  • Like
Reactions: WPAlum2010
btw, what's up with the boomer? I really am stumped on that one.

You should capitalize the Btw. Next, it’s what generation you are in. So people have started the “ok boomer” response to people who say dumb things that are boomers.

Btw? Totally a boomer thing to ask. Thanks for being consistent. If anything lol
 
You should capitalize the Btw. Next, it’s what generation you are in. So people have started the “ok boomer” response to people who say dumb things that are boomers.

Btw? Totally a boomer thing to ask. Thanks for being consistent. If anything lol
Definitely not that old, but alrighty then. Glad you're getting a chance to practice you're name calling though. In this thread alone, knuckle dragger, captain obvious, loser, boomer, moron. That's a pretty good repertoire. I'm proud of you.
 
Definitely not that old, but alrighty then. Glad you're getting a chance to practice you're name calling though. In this thread alone, knuckle dragger, captain obvious, loser, boomer, moron. That's a pretty good repertoire. I'm proud of you.

O lines win games. Wow that’s literally never been stated before. Where did you come up with this amazing discovery?
 
Definitely not that old, but alrighty then. Glad you're getting a chance to practice you're name calling though. In this thread alone, knuckle dragger, captain obvious, loser, boomer, moron. That's a pretty good repertoire. I'm proud of you.
If you aren’t in the age group of a boomer? Then I’m concerned for you. This level of stupidity is concerning then.
 
If you aren’t in the age group of a boomer? Then I’m concerned for you. This level of stupidity is concerning then.
For a long time, I figured you were really a guy posing as a woman online, but to put up an argument that is this aggressive, yet has so few actual valid points, you have to be a woman. I believe it now.
 
For a long time, I figured you were really a guy posing as a woman online, but to put up an argument that is this aggressive, yet has so few actual valid points, you have to be a woman. I believe it now.

Sexist. Confirmed. But by all means continue. Opinions are like a$$holes. Everyone has one. Continue to state yours. I’m enjoying it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: O line wins games
You’ve stated some pretty off colored things about women on here. I’ve called you out, it doesn’t surprise me you couldn’t help but to add comments on this. You two are like peas in a pod.
Report, report, report. You are ridiculous. Going at everyone on here the way you are. Why don’t you go to another site and do this kind of thing.
 
You’ve stated some pretty off colored things about women on here. I’ve called you out, it doesn’t surprise me you couldn’t help but to add comments on this. You two are like peas in a pod.
Waaaaaah play the victim................:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: WPAlum2010
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT