https://www.stltoday.com/sports/bas...cle_6a676320-71ec-52e1-a2d3-455391b149b8.html
I assume this will lead to a robust boom in the offense???
I assume this will lead to a robust boom in the offense???
Kind of an odd deal. It was a weird pairing with he and Albert from the beginning. They have different philosophies. Some player's comments seem to say Buddha took a pretty simple approach. Albert's data driven approach is probably not as simple. Apparently friction had developed and Shildt decided he liked Albert better. We'll see how the players react. I doubt it changes much overall.https://www.stltoday.com/sports/bas...cle_6a676320-71ec-52e1-a2d3-455391b149b8.html
I assume this will lead to a robust boom in the offense???
https://www.stltoday.com/sports/bas...cle_6a676320-71ec-52e1-a2d3-455391b149b8.html
I assume this will lead to a robust boom in the offense???
I don't disagree with much of what you said, other than Shildt having any say in it. I just don't see that as the case. All of this is Mo. No chance a move like this gets made w/o it being Mo. He's trying to run everything since the TLR days. Basically trying to get everything data driven and cost-controlled. I wish I had more confidence in his decision making.Kind of an odd deal. It was a weird pairing with he and Albert from the beginning. They have different philosophies. Some player's comments seem to say Buddha took a pretty simple approach. Albert's data driven approach is probably not as simple. Apparently friction had developed and Shildt decided he liked Albert better. We'll see how the players react. I doubt it changes much overall.
I'm just going off what Shildt said. He said ultimately it was his decision. Not sure why he'd cover for Mo but who knows.I don't disagree with much of what you said, other than Shildt having any say in it. I just don't see that as the case. All of this is Mo. No chance a move like this gets made w/o it being Mo. He's trying to run everything since the TLR days. Basically trying to get everything data driven and cost-controlled. I wish I had more confidence in his decision making.
I get that. I just think Mo is trying to run everything. And he'd cover for Mo because he was Mo's hand-picked puppet.I'm just going off what Shildt said. He said ultimately it was his decision. Not sure why he'd cover for Mo but who knows.
https://www.stltoday.com/sports/bas...cle_31a2e7bd-a769-50b3-8734-3c2f67a1a315.html
I read that one. Thought it was really, really strange that Shildt tried to highlight it was his call. Almost like a tell that it totally wasn't his call. That said, I can't stand Shildt. He's not Matheny bad, but he's certainly no savant. You'd think someone with his background and lack of playing history would be an absolute savant.I'm just going off what Shildt said. He said ultimately it was his decision. Not sure why he'd cover for Mo but who knows.
https://www.stltoday.com/sports/bas...cle_31a2e7bd-a769-50b3-8734-3c2f67a1a315.html
I do think there had to be some issues or they wouldn't have made this move now. I don't think it was made lightly or just for a scapegoat. It had to be pretty severe to not put off until the off season.I get that. I just think Mo is trying to run everything. And he'd cover for Mo because he was Mo's hand-picked puppet.
I'm not sold on Shildt either. Is his record better then Mike's since he took over? It can't be much different. And he picked up an All-Star 1B who was supposed to be the hitter they've needed since Pujols left.I read that one. Thought it was really, really strange that Shildt tried to highlight it was his call. Almost like a tell that it totally wasn't his call. That said, I can't stand Shildt. He's not Matheny bad, but he's certainly no savant. You'd think someone with his background and lack of playing history would be an absolute savant.
If we can just get hot we can win this baby!!!You know what Doug says.
I don't think he's good at all. He's obviously not seeing it well, in a massive age decline, or not responding well to the Albert philosophy...or some combo of all of the above. I just don't really see a viable replacement for him, nor a real reason to replace him. Carp and Yadi crater the current lineup. Fowler has been ok lately, but for most of the season he's been pretty bad too. I'm just on board with trying something different. I hate Shildt's BS of "hey, something must be working, we're xxxxxx games out of 1st or in 1st". The bar is pretty low when you're judging yourself against the rest of the Central. I just don't see how replacing some hurt/ineffective aging vets will hurt things. I always go back to when The Skipper sat Rolen in favor of Spiezio in '06. Sometimes you get to a point where you just have to play who's going to be the most productive. It sucks, but it's fact.Bro, I don’t want to burst anyone’s bubble, but Goldie has been good for about 5 of the 20 weeks of this season. Otherwise he has been horrible. So many swings and misses.
If you think they ain't gonna play Molina down the stretch you're dreamin.If we can just get hot we can win this baby!!!
Oddly enough, I really thought the Blues had a chance. Bennington was the difference maker. The Blues took a chance on him and that 4th line...Shildt and Mo continue to play Carp, Fowler (he’s been BETTER but still isn’t very good), Molina, and run Wacha out there every fifth day or so. If nothing else, I’d love to see them get out of the missionary position and try something new.
CF Arozarena
2B Wong
1B Goldschmidt
LF Ozuna
SS Dejong
RF Thomas
C Weiters
3B Edman/Munoz combo
#1SP Flaherty
#2SP Mikolas
#3SP Waino
#4SP Hudson
#5SP Helsley/Gant opener combo...rely on Gallegos and Fernandez a little more in the pen to cover Gant.
I know...but it's the wrong call. Weiters is a better option, and I'm not sure it's really even a close call.If you think they ain't gonna play Molina down the stretch you're dreamin.
I think that's part of the dearth of information. And I agree. That's why I liked Big Mac so much in that role. Pick out the first good pitch you see and absolutely try to hammer it.I can't help but agree with Doug this morning. He brought up taking so many good pitches. Repeatedly they take the first pitch right down the middle and then end up swinging at worse pitches and striking out. I don't know if the pitch count theory is Albert's or whose but like so many things Doug is right again. Just be ready for and swing at the first good pitch you see. Who cares if it's the first pitch or not. It should be easier to hit a pitch down the middle than a slider off the plate regardless of which pitch number it is.
Weiters is still pretty dang good based on what I've seen of him.I know...but it's the wrong call. Weiters is a better option, and I'm not sure it's really even a close call.
Couldn’t agree more with all of this. It’s so spot on. I wasn’t a great hitter by any means. My coach for a lot of my youth was the #4 starter in the Astros organization with JR Richard, Mike Scott, and can’t remember the other guy. He was with them through AA. Guy knows baseball. Was basically his whole theory. With no strikes, unless we were in small ball mode, we hunted a fastball. With one strike, it was get a good one and hit it where it was pitched. With two strikes, get up on the plate, shorten up, and put the bat on it. I get legion and babe Ruth ball is different than the majors, but there’s some validity and carryover.I kind of like a pitching coach who says look for a freakin fastball down the middle on the first pitch and when you get it, take it for a ride. After that be a real hitter and hit the ball hard where it is pitched. With two strikes shorten up and put it in play.
Instead we have guys thinking about 15 different things, data driven guessing, Ks out the arse, and for two nights we cant buy a hit followed by a 13 run explosion on day three. And when we face a new pitcher for the first time, we are completely lost.