Biden pardons Hunter!!!

[blindedbythelight]

You can deflect, distract, excuse, and minimize all you want like your entire cult does, in the end he is a convicted FELON.

In the end he is President Elect of the United States of America

The fact that a state AG got elected running on a platform that she would put Trump in prison is beyond lawfare. Very good chance the New York conviction is thrown out and Trump brings federal racketeering charges against everyone involved

 

[Arcola]

So was Adolf Hitler in 1938.

Touche. Great point.

“Time has also addressed its selection of Hitler as “Man of the Year” for 1938 multiple times. A Time article in the Dec. 13, 2021, issue states that “The Person of the Year” title, which was “The Man of the Year” until 1999, goes to a person who most affected the news, opens new tab and lives of people for good or ill, and citing Hitler as an example, notes that the person need not be a hero.“

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/time-magazines-1938-man-year-choice-not-hitler-endorsement-2024-03-08/

 

[kaskaskiakid]

In the end he is President Elect of the United States of America

The fact that a state AG got elected running on a platform that she would put Trump in prison is beyond lawfare. Very good chance the New York conviction is thrown out and Trump brings federal racketeering charges against everyone involved

In the end, Trump was guilty of knowingly cooking the books of campaign finances to pay a hooker hush money weeks before the election. You and the MAGAs tap dance around that fact and refuse to admit he committed a crime.

 

[r14veer]

In the end he is President Elect of the United States of America

The fact that a state AG got elected running on a platform that she would put Trump in prison is beyond lawfare. Very good chance the New York conviction is thrown out and Trump brings federal racketeering charges against everyone involved

It is not "lawfare" to run on the idea of convicting a criminal of a crime when there is enough evidence for a jury to see fit to do so. Substitute the word "Trump" in that sentence with "people for whom there is copious evidence of crimes committed" and it's not too objectionable, is it?

 

[Expect2Win]

Are all of Trump's associates innocent as well?