Anti?

[Duck_walk]

Does not agreeing with presidential policies (for example detaining children in cages or ignoring climate change, etc) make you anti-American?

Does disagreeing with some of Israel’s actions or disagreeing with the U.S. constantly catering to Israel make you an anti-Semite?

 

[Duck_walk]

Roe v Wade is the law of the land. If you are against abortion you should go back to your country of origin.

Don’t like gay marriage? Same.

 

[DirtyDan17]

Roe v Wade is the law of the land. If you are against abortion you should go back to your country of origin.

Don’t like gay marriage? Same.

Slavery used to be the law of the land. Laws change. If you're in favor of murdering babies then there's really no help for you.

 

[DirtyDan17]

Does not agreeing with presidential policies (for example detaining children in cages or ignoring climate change, etc) make you anti-American?

Does disagreeing with some of Israel’s actions or disagreeing with the U.S. constantly catering to Israel make you an anti-Semite?

Roe v Wade is the law of the land. If you are against abortion you should go back to your country of origin.

I'm sure you don't see how intellectually inconsistent you are (you're SUPER liberal, facts and logic don't matter) in one post you pretend to care about the welfare of children, in the VERY NEXT POST, you espouse your support for the state sponsored murder of babies.

You're either stupid or evil.

 

[millerbleach]

Does not agreeing with presidential policies (for example detaining children in cages or ignoring climate change, etc) make you anti-American?

Does disagreeing with some of Israel’s actions or disagreeing with the U.S. constantly catering to Israel make you an anti-Semite?

No.
If those kids were being kept in "cages" i'd be anti too.
No one is saying disagreeing is anti American.

 

[millerbleach]

Roe v Wade is the law of the land. If you are against abortion you should go back to your country of origin.

Don’t like gay marriage? Same.

Notice I (and Trump) both support more money to detain illegal children in better conditions and allowing children to be born as opposed to murdered.
Maybe you should evaluate your viewpoints consistency.

 

[millerbleach]

Dan, I think Duck may actually have an unbeatable stance on here. If you respond you look foolish talking to someone in a sound proof room. If you don't respond you are accused of ignoring him.

 

[DirtyDan17]

Dan, I think Duck may actually have an unbeatable stance on here. If you respond you look foolish talking to someone in a sound proof room. If you don't respond you are accused of ignoring him.

It's not about getting a response. He's a child and can't be reasoned with. It's about discussing my opinion on a discussion board.

 

[millerbleach]

It's not about getting a response. He's a child and can't be reasoned with. It's about discussing my opinion on a discussion board.

I understand and fully believe he has no one on ignore. This way, he doesn't have to defend his points while being able to throw out absurdities. If we don't respond it looks like we can't rebut him and if we do respond to his absurdities it looks like we are barking at the wind.

 

[DirtyDan17]

I understand and fully believe he has no one on ignore. This way, he doesn't have to defend his points while being able to throw out absurdities. If we don't respond it looks like we can't rebut him and if we do respond to his absurdities it looks like we are barking at the wind.

Oh no doubt. He doesnt have anyone on ignore, he's having a harder and harder time not engaging too.

 

[Duck_walk]

 

[bullitpdq68]

Does not agreeing with presidential policies (for example detaining children in cages or ignoring climate change, etc) make you anti-American?

Does disagreeing with some of Israel’s actions or disagreeing with the U.S. constantly catering to Israel make you an anti-Semite?

To disagree with something is one thing, I don't agree with what we are doing as a country to illegal immigrants, however at this point I don't see any other options. We cannot just let anybody walk across our border/s without being properly vetted. I disagree, but I think it is up to congress and the president to come up with a solution to fix this issue. It is clear that we do need a southern fence/wall whatever you want to call it to deter entry. We also need to speed up the process for those waiting, be it more courts and judges let's do it,

You should be able disagree with people ..I just feel that both sides want to have shouting match and not an honest conversation about what needs to be done.

 

[Duck_walk]

To disagree with something is one thing, I don't agree with what we are doing as a country to illegal immigrants, however at this point I don't see any other options. We cannot just let anybody walk across our border/s without being properly vetted. I disagree, but I think it is up to congress and the president to come up with a solution to fix this issue. It is clear that we do need a southern fence/wall whatever you want to call it to deter entry. We also need to speed up the process for those waiting, be it more courts and judges let's do it,

You should be able disagree with people ..I just feel that both sides want to have shouting match and not an honest conversation about what needs to be done.

The point sir is that it’s healthy to disagree. It’s right to disagree. It is ok to criticize.
But only one a-hole is calling people anti American for it. And he is only saying that about non-whites. He is fanning the flames of hate.

 

[bullitpdq68]

The point sir is that it’s healthy to disagree. It’s right to disagree. It is ok to criticize.
But only one a-hole is calling people anti American for it. And he is only saying that about non-whites. He is fanning the flames of hate.

I disagree, one congress person draped a terrorist flag around them once they one election. What would have happened if a white person had won a seat in congress and draped themselves in a confederate flag or even just the Israeli flag. You and every liberal would have come unhinged. That is the difference, you pick and chose who is racist based on their political party.

 

[Duck_walk]

I disagree, one congress person draped a terrorist flag around them once they one election. What would have happened if a white person had won a seat in congress and draped themselves in a confederate flag or even just the Israeli flag. You and every liberal would have come unhinged. That is the difference, you pick and chose who is racist based on their political party.

I know this is difficult for you to understand so I will type it slow. There is a mountain of difference between the influence of one first term rep and the leader of the free world. One can be ignored or laughed at. The other has to be taken seriously. Your focus is silly.
Show me an unaltered picture of a rep with a “terrorist flag”.

 

[bullitpdq68]

I know this is difficult for you to understand so I will type it slow. There is a mountain of difference between the influence of one first term rep and the leader of the free world. One can be ignored or laughed at. The other has to be taken seriously. Your focus is silly.
Show me an unaltered picture of a rep with a “terrorist flag”.

LOL, I think your focus is silly, I showed you I can be unbiased...but you are still focused on one thing. Why don't you actually answer a question with out throwing insults.

So my understanding of your view point is that nobody should question anybody in congress about their beliefs. Only the President's beliefs matters, is that correct?

 

[Duck_walk]

LOL, I think your focus is silly, I showed you I can be unbiased...but you are still focused on one thing. Why don't you actually answer a question with out throwing insults.

So my understanding of your view point is that nobody should question anybody in congress about their beliefs. Only the President's beliefs matters, is that correct?

There are congressmen all over the country I can’t stand. I hate their beliefs. But I can’t vote them out. So why waste energy worrying about them? Pelosi and McConnell are worthy of attention and scorn. Mccarthy and Schumer might actually be relevant to our lives. Betsy from the Bronx or Larry from Louisiana are not worthy of my concern.

 

[bullitpdq68]

There are congressmen all over the country I can’t stand. I hate their beliefs. But I can’t vote them out. So why waste energy worrying about them? Pelosi and McConnell are worthy of attention and scorn. Mccarthy and Schumer might actually be relevant to our lives. Betsy from the Bronx or Larry from Louisiana are not worthy of my concern.

You just pointed out the leaders which I agree with, and right now those 4 are trying to lead congress and the Dems in a different direction. So I think because of that it is worthy to look at their ideology and past decisions. Just as I think it is worthy to look at Trumps.

You need to take a hard look at the leaders. So these questions are legit.