You are one weird dude with a very weird idea of justice. Get over your self righteousness, you sound like a recording with the same answer/question for everything that come up.
Last edited:
Alabama governor signs chemical castration bill into law
- Thread starter have an idea
- Start date
I really cannot hardly dissect your illegible response.
Is it ok to kill 50% innocent people?
100% ?
Do you support chemical castration or intensive therapy and treatment?
THAT was my question.
I'll put it it you where even YOU can understand. I HAVE NO OPINION ON THAT SUBJECT. I hadn't even heard about until I read it on here. I had heard it mentioned in the past but not recently. What I do NOT support is killing the offender and the victim like YOU do! Now go ahead and ask me again if you want.
Simply idiotic. No, you support killing innocent babies with your vote.
You have no opinion and yet you want to comment 40 times on something that has NOTHING to do with my stance or the original post. You're obtuse and just want to frustrate others instead of moving the conversation along. Typical trollish behavior.
Either forward the conversation or stop responding to everything I post.
You saying you think an offender AND their victim should be killed and that is the ONLY way to fix the problem has a LOT to do with the YOUR stance. YOU posted it more than once so live with it! You don't HAVE to read, or respond, to ANYTHING I post but I WILL post if I so choose mister high an mighty.
So I NEVER said that therapy and treatment would be beneficial? I NEVER said it was preferable to chemical castration?
Be honest, quit being an obstinately idiotic. You know that's not what I support, you're just being an @ss. Likely because you've been called out for supporting baby killing.
I am guessing you are probably responding to the panty waste who thinks we should all trade in our pickup trucks for a Prius. Bahahahaha. What a p&$$×. Tough guy wants to kill rape victims????
Last edited:
What the heck is an obstinately idiotic?
I'll repeat the question you obviously want to ignore.
So I NEVER said that therapy and treatment would be beneficial? I NEVER said it was preferable to chemical castration?
You did, in the same post as you said kill em all because that's the ONLY way to make sure. I ain't the one beating this subject to death. I'll give you a sort of an opinion on the Alabama thang. It sounds like torture to me and that just ain't legal in the U.S. last I heard.
Which did I say more often? Kill them all or provide therapy and treatment?
I'm beating it to death because YOU beat it to death misrepresenting what I said.
It's not torture, it's not even painful. But it also doesn't kill the urge because the urge is psychological not physical. Which is why I was pushing for treatment. Which you would already know if you were capable of understanding what you read.
Or if you weren't just deadset on disagreeing with everything I say regardless of if it makes sense or not.
No, I've agreed on several liberal positions. The position that we should focus on rehabilitation instead of punishment is a very liberal position. If you or Duck had said the exact same thing, 3R either wouldn't have responded or would have agreed with you. He sees me respond to a post and wants to disagree just because it was me who posted.
I'm quick to tell you snowflakes when we are in agreement. Gives me hope you're not all lost causes.
I don't know if it's painful or not but if you think for one minute there would be no mental torture with that procedure I have no idea what to tell ya.
Then what is the point? You asked me what I thought of some right wing nut signing a bill I knew nothing about before that. I've seen some strange things come out Alabama before, Roy Moore comes to mind. I didn't have vote in Alabama anymore than I do in NY or Cali.
Similar threads
