Maxpreps Missouri Top Ten (Classes 1 to 6) going into the final week.

[JNsDaddyzDaddyIownU]

MAXPREPS TOP 10 RANKINGS GOING INTO THE FINAL REGULAR SEASON GAME
How the objective performance-based ranking is calculated: http://calpreps.com/ratings.htm


CLASS 6

1. Lee’s Summit North
2. Liberty North
3. De Smet
4. CBC
5. Rock
6. Lee’s Summit West
7. Nixa
8. Liberty
9. Oak Park
10. Jackson

CLASS 5

1. Cardinal Ritter
2. Lebanon
3. Helias
4. Grain Valley
5. Rockwood Summit
6. Webb
7. Republic
8. Platte County
9. St. Dominic
10. Fort Osage

CLASS 4

1. Lutheran North
2. Hillsboro
3. Kearney
4. Nevada
5. Hannibal
6. Parkway North
7. Smithville
8. Festus
9. Pleasant Hill
10. Savannah

CLASS 3

1. Blair Oaks
2. Seneca
3. Maryville
4. Ava
5. Odessa
6. Borgia
7. St. Pius X
8. Southern Boone
9. Mt. Vernon
10. Centralia

CLASS 2

1. South Shelby
2. Bowling Green
3. Lamar
4. East Buch
5. Valle
6. Fair Grove
7. Lafayette County
8. Adrian
9. New Madrid
10. Butler

CLASS 1

1. North Platte
2. Marionville
3. Milan
4. Portageville
5. Tipton
6. Thayer
7. Penney
8. St. Vincent
9. Polo
10. Van-Far

 

[J. Kane]

CLASS .5

1. North Platte
2. Marionville
3. Milan
4. Portageville
5. Tipton
6. Thayer
7. Penney
8. St. Vincent
9. Polo
10. Van-Far

 

[Veer2Eternity]

 

[KevAn92]

CLASS 4

1. Lutheran North
2. Hillsboro
3. Kearney
4. Nevada
5. Hannibal
6. Parkway North
7. Smithville
8. Festus
9. Pleasant Hill
10. Savannah

Savannah in the top 10? Laughable. Parkway North, Hannibal, and Nevada higher than Smithville? Just plain dumb.

This is what you get when you look at a California based company's take on MO high school football.

 

[JNsDaddyzDaddyIownU]

Savannah in the top 10? Laughable. Parkway North, Hannibal, and Nevada higher than Smithville? Just plain dumb.

This is what you get when you look at a California based company's take on MO high school football.

Completely objective. It is who you have played and how you have played them. Scores and relative comparisons. You really get punished for a weak schedule. Nevada has played four opponents rated higher than Smithville's third-best opponent.

 

[Veer2Eternity]

Completely objective. It is who you have played and how you have played them. Scores and relative comparisons. You really get punished for a weak schedule. Nevada has played four opponents rated higher than Smithville's third-best opponent.

WINS: #8728 Sarcoxie (MO) (42-6), #10184 Ash Grove (MO) (42-0), #10529 Diamond (MO) (41-8), #10519 Stockton/Sheldon (Stockton, MO) (12-7), #10977 Lighthouse Christian (Springfield, MO) (50-0), #11255 Central (Springfield, MO) (35-6), #12756 Pierce City (MO) (31-3), #13377 Willow Springs (MO) (70-6), LOSSES: none

 

[Boogie_Mane]

Joey been waiting to post this since the last game between Smithville and KMO. Looking for any inch to claim the superiority of KMO in any numbers advantage.

We get it, Joey, you love KMO, hate trolls, and probably like soggy waffles.

I hope they can remain healthy so the district championship can be enjoyable not one-sided rivalry it has been since 2018.

 

[Boogie_Mane]

Completely objective. It is who you have played and how you have played them. Scores and relative comparisons. You really get punished for a weak schedule. Nevada has played four opponents rated higher than Smithville's third-best opponent.

Who ranks these teams? I think some media personnel don't have a grasp on football as a scheme or week to week performances. Scores never show a full picture. For example, week 3 Sville and KMO you saw a clear divide due to the injuries on KMO.

I feel there should be a coaches ranking system combined with media to show a better picture.

 

[KevAn92]

Completely objective. It is who you have played and how you have played them. Scores and relative comparisons. You really get punished for a weak schedule. Nevada has played four opponents rated higher than Smithville's third-best opponent.

I get it. It is just crazy to me because if you watched any of these teams live and then compared this list would look quite different.

 

[KevAn92]

Who ranks these teams? I think some media personnel don't have a grasp on football as a scheme or week to week performances. Scores never show a full picture. For example, week 3 Sville and KMO you saw a clear divide due to the injuries on KMO.

I feel there should be a coaches ranking system combined with media to show a better picture.

Just a stats company. Based out of California. A fun talking point but rarely any substance

 

[Veer2Eternity]

Just a stats company. Based out of California. A fun talking point but rarely any substance

honestly it's better than MSHSAA's system of rewarding teams for playing crappy higher classification teams.

 

[JNsDaddyzDaddyIownU]

Just a stats company. Based out of California. A fun talking point but rarely any substance

But over 85% accurate on picks. Love to have this on a trip to Kansas for college and NFL games. Performance is performance.

 

[JNsDaddyzDaddyIownU]

Joey been waiting to post this since the last game between Smithville and KMO. Looking for any inch to claim the superiority of KMO in any numbers advantage.

We get it, Joey, you love KMO, hate trolls, and probably like soggy waffles.

I hope they can remain healthy so the district championship can be enjoyable not one-sided rivalry it has been since 2018.

Ah...look who is making excuses.

 

[JNsDaddyzDaddyIownU]

I love these newbies on here with their agendas. I've been putting Calpreps rankings on here for years, dare I say before Smithville was even halfway relevant. I love the trolls making excuses for rankings they don't like. Bhaaha

 

[KevAn92]

I love these newbies on here with their agendas. I've been putting Calpreps rankings on here for years, dare I say before Smithville was even halfway relevant. I love the trolls making excuses for rankings they don't like. Bhaaha

I am admittedly a Smithville fan, however, my qualms are not because I don't like these rankings in particular. I don't like rankings to begin with. Just like stats I feel they are for losers. I get it though, it is kind of the whole point of mosports to talk nonsense about MO high school football. Otherwise WHAT WOULD WE DO?!?!? I'd be more inclined to take your own rankings more seriously than some CBS affiliate from out of state.

 

[Boogie_Mane]

Ah...look who is making excuses.

I see no excuses. I'm trying to be partial to the fact I admit KMO has talent. I'll still take my Warriors regardless. I also know you have posted CalPreps. It just seems as of late the posting has been neigh since...yah know...KMO "isn't healthy" or "QB 53."

Rankings are that, just rankings. I find it odd that you waited this long to post when other polls rank teams (your team) differently. I just find it odd that you willingly post those rather than local media who has certain teams not even on the board.

I think a week to week cal preps ranking would be cool for the future. Is it a reasoning to post this mainly due to the depth of the season can garner more accurate info? If so, I get it.

I'm with KeVan on the part of rankings of HS teams using systems like CalPreps and media in general. Jaded views of games are driving the system. 85% accuracy is pretty neat though, I would have guessed higher.

 

[Treadmill]

Savannah in the top 10? Laughable. Parkway North, Hannibal, and Nevada higher than Smithville? Just plain dumb.

This is what you get when you look at a California based company's take on MO high school football.

And Kearney is also higher than Smithville and Smithville beat them head-to-head this year by 3 TDs.

 

[War355]

I don't get the difference between the Top 10 Rankings and their Project a Matchup . I am a Smithville fan and have followed the calpreps Project a Matchup pretty closely over the last 3 years. They do remarkably well. I would much rather have them on my side than not. Last week's projected score for Smithville v. Pittsburg was 35-12. Actual 36-18.

Here's some more as of today.

10/18/2023
Kearney	27	Savannah	21
Kearney	28	East Buchanan	24
Kearney	21	Maryville	28
Kearney	27	Smithville	28

Are we buying these projected scores?

Also, if margin of victory is a thing that sways the calculations, I doubt you would see Smithville running a trick play up 21 vs. Winnetonka.

 

[Veer2Eternity]

I don't get the difference between the Top 10 Rankings and their Project a Matchup . I am a Smithville fan and have followed the calpreps Project a Matchup pretty closely over the last 3 years. They do remarkably well. I would much rather have them on my side than not. Last week's projected score for Smithville v. Pittsburg was 35-12. Actual 36-18.

Here's some more as of today.

10/18/2023
Kearney	27	Savannah	21
Kearney	28	East Buchanan	24
Kearney	21	Maryville	28
Kearney	27	Smithville	28

Are we buying these projected scores?

Also, if margin of victory is a thing that sways the calculations, I doubt you would see Smithville running a trick play up 21 vs. Winnetonka.

View embedded media

they look accurate to me

 

[JNsDaddyzDaddyIownU]

And Kearney is also higher than Smithville and Smithville beat them head-to-head this year by 3 TDs.

Smithville beat Kearney without three all-state athletes on D who have been back since week 4, and without the starting DE and QB1 (who just got a D1 offer last week.) As you must know, K played a 3rd String JV QB3. In a 5 turnover game, they did outgain SV in total yards, regardless of the score.

With the bulk of their top shelf injured players back, they are moving up on Calpreps ratings because of performance. For example, blowing out Ruskin, Ray South and Grandview. Smithville was only up 21-12 on Grandview with a minute left. And only beat Ruskin 28-12. A good Grandview blowout would help the score, I'm sure.

I would also say the current version of the Bulldogs would have a much higher objective rating had they not been missing those players the first three games. The comparative performance ratings bare that out, and a 15 point uptick per game.

 

[ugaboz]

terrible

 

[JoeENorthlando]

Just a stats company. Based out of California. A fun talking point but rarely any substance

Bahaha. 24-21. Caplreps said. 28-26.

Please go on with your theory?

 

[JoeENorthlando]

I don't get the difference between the Top 10 Rankings and their Project a Matchup . I am a Smithville fan and have followed the calpreps Project a Matchup pretty closely over the last 3 years. They do remarkably well. I would much rather have them on my side than not. Last week's projected score for Smithville v. Pittsburg was 35-12. Actual 36-18.

Here's some more as of today.

10/18/2023
Kearney	27	Savannah	21
Kearney	28	East Buchanan	24
Kearney	21	Maryville	28
Kearney	27	Smithville	28

Are we buying these projected scores?

Also, if margin of victory is a thing that sways the calculations, I doubt you would see Smithville running a trick play up 21 vs. Winnetonka.

View embedded media

24-21 over Grandview??? What? Baha

 

[KevAn92]

Bahaha. 24-21. Caplreps said. 28-26.

Please go on with your theory?

Understood, Joey has no knack for football and must rely on Cali nerds to tell him what to think

 

[JNsDaddyzDaddyIownU]

Savannah in the top 10? Laughable. Parkway North, Hannibal, and Nevada higher than Smithville? Just plain dumb.

This is what you get when you look at a California based company's take on MO high school football.

Laughable now Jacktard?

Nevada 42 Grandview 0
Smithville 24 Grandview 21

 

[JNsDaddyzDaddyIownU]

Understood, Joey has no knack for football and must rely on Cali nerds to tell him what to think

Kev has no knack for knowing how to rate teams. Bahaha.

 

[KevAn92]

Kev has no knack for knowing how to rate teams. Bahaha.

3:30 in the morning and this is what you choose to do with your time? Put the bottle down and get some rest big fella. Good luck next week

 

[KevAn92]

Kev has no knack for knowing how to rate teams. Bahaha.

because, once again, ratings are for losers. Play the game, win or lose, the rest is just for us old washed up folks to discuss

 

[blindedbythelight]

Smithville beat Kearney without three all-state athletes on D who have been back since week 4, and without the starting DE and QB1 (who just got a D1 offer last week.) As you must know, K played a 3rd String JV QB3. In a 5 turnover game, they did outgain SV in total yards, regardless of the score.

With the bulk of their top shelf injured players back, they are moving up on Calpreps ratings because of performance. For example, blowing out Ruskin, Ray South and Grandview. Smithville was only up 21-12 on Grandview with a minute left. And only beat Ruskin 28-12. A good Grandview blowout would help the score, I'm sure.

I would also say the current version of the Bulldogs would have a much higher objective rating had they not been missing those players the first three games. The comparative performance ratings bare that out, and a 15 point uptick per game.

You keep talking about these mythical Allstate football players that have been hurt early in the season I looked at the coaches Allstate list from last year and I only saw one Junior from Kearney that made the list and he was third string I believe just exactly who are all these Allstate players on the Kearney roster or are they some of your vaunted track stars????

 

[JNsDaddyzDaddyIownU]

I see no excuses. I'm trying to be partial to the fact I admit KMO has talent. I'll still take my Warriors regardless. I also know you have posted CalPreps. It just seems as of late the posting has been neigh since...yah know...KMO "isn't healthy" or "QB 53."

Rankings are that, just rankings. I find it odd that you waited this long to post when other polls rank teams (your team) differently. I just find it odd that you willingly post those rather than local media who has certain teams not even on the board.

I think a week to week cal preps ranking would be cool for the future. Is it a reasoning to post this mainly due to the depth of the season can garner more accurate info? If so, I get it.

I'm with KeVan on the part of rankings of HS teams using systems like CalPreps and media in general. Jaded views of games are driving the system. 85% accuracy is pretty neat though, I would have guessed higher.

Since I’ve been here over a decade, I just love coming back to newb posts talking sh!t like this. FYI. The top 3 Calpreps had for C4 at the end of the season was dead on.

 

[cardsfan200306]

Since I’ve been here over a decade, I just love coming back to newb posts talking sh!t like this. FYI. The top 3 Calpreps had for C4 at the end of the season was dead on.

1 out of 7 classes ain't bad