ADVERTISEMENT

You have two choices. Which do you prefer?

Duck_walk

Well-Known Member
Oct 17, 2002
23,081
4,231
113
If you are faced with these two choices, which do you prefer? If you want a third option, go away and dont comment.

Option 1:

Trump agrees to resign by year's end in exchange for no prosecution of him nor his family members now or in the future.
We go ahead and throw Stone and company in prison for life.

Pence becomes president--unless he gets indicted also.

Option 2:

We indict Jared, Junior, Stone, and their helpers. Trump stays as president and we put up with him for the next two years. But as soon as he loses in 2020 and leaves office, we prosecute his arse for all his felonies.
 
If you are faced with these two choices, which do you prefer? If you want a third option, go away and dont comment.

Option 1:

Trump agrees to resign by year's end in exchange for no prosecution of him nor his family members now or in the future.
We go ahead and throw Stone and company in prison for life.

Pence becomes president--unless he gets indicted also.

Option 2:

We indict Jared, Junior, Stone, and their helpers. Trump stays as president and we put up with him for the next two years. But as soon as he loses in 2020 and leaves office, we prosecute his arse for all his felonies.
Tough decision. Let me ponder that for awhile.
 
Rubin's prediction. Trump will resign 10 minutes before the 2021 inauguration so Pence can pardon him.

 
You guys are really ate up with this stuff. You actually thing there is a there there.
Yesterday I watched the Sunday morning shows Fox and NBC. Both tried to make a case there was news in the Mueller thing bad for the President but Chuck Todd was so giddy i'm sure he peed his pants. When Angus King ("independent" Sen. from Maine) was asked what stood out to him, he said there wasn't anything noteworthy in the Cohen or Manafort dealings but was intrigued by the deal Flynn got. He thought that could indicate Flynn had given Mueller something substantial but time would tell. He also said any attempt to impeach Trump was just partisan politics and bad for the country. Rand Paul just kind of shrugged the whole thing off wondering what they thought was actually a crime here. The media commentators were all wrought up nonetheless without anything to support their excitement. You guys are the same way with giant expectations and no reasons.
 
You guys are really ate up with this stuff. You actually thing there is a there there.
Yesterday I watched the Sunday morning shows Fox and NBC. Both tried to make a case there was news in the Mueller thing bad for the President but Chuck Todd was so giddy i'm sure he peed his pants. When Angus King ("independent" Sen. from Maine) was asked what stood out to him, he said there wasn't anything noteworthy in the Cohen or Manafort dealings but was intrigued by the deal Flynn got. He thought that could indicate Flynn had given Mueller something substantial but time would tell. He also said any attempt to impeach Trump was just partisan politics and bad for the country. Rand Paul just kind of shrugged the whole thing off wondering what they thought was actually a crime here. The media commentators were all wrought up nonetheless without anything to support their excitement. You guys are the same way with giant expectations and no reasons.

How do you explain this Miller?

 
  • Like
Reactions: TJ_DUB
How do you explain this Miller?

PLEASE go back to doing what you CLAIM you were doing! You are the most ate up person alive!
When Trump answers questions, he answers what he thinks they are asking. He thought they were asking if there were connections regarding election interference since that was the claim. It would be stupid to think they were asking if they simply had ANY connections since they were WIDELY known. Trump openly talked about his relationships with Russia citing them as a positive.
You think there is some HUGE gotcha in there somewhere but there isn't a crime even involved in talking to, dealing with, or even COLLUDING with anyone from ANY country.
 
PLEASE go back to doing what you CLAIM you were doing! You are the most ate up person alive!
When Trump answers questions, he answers what he thinks they are asking. He thought they were asking if there were connections regarding election interference since that was the claim. It would be stupid to think they were asking if they simply had ANY connections since they were WIDELY known. Trump openly talked about his relationships with Russia citing them as a positive.
You think there is some HUGE gotcha in there somewhere but there isn't a crime even involved in talking to, dealing with, or even COLLUDING with anyone from ANY country.

You seem angry. FOURTEEN different associates had hook ups with russians.
If you think that is normal, then after all this time you are still in denial .

Lets see. I want to make 100 million off Trump Tower Moscow so I am going to set up my foreign policy to favor Putin. And I am going to praise him at every turn. Remember how puzzled everyone was when he kissed putins butt? Now we know why.
Thank you Mr Cohen.

My son in law is going to attempt to set up secret back channel communication so you comrades can help us with getting elected.
U help me win, I lift sanctions and then we
go for Ivanka Tower in Russia. My profit determines my policy, not what is best for my country. My followers are so stupid they will believe whatever I say. They will make excuses for everything I steal.
 
The way miller eats up t rump and his leadership, if he had been in Germany in the 30's he would have been one of Hitler's boys.
 
PLEASE go back to doing what you CLAIM you were doing! You are the most ate up person alive!
When Trump answers questions, he answers what he thinks they are asking. He thought they were asking if there were connections regarding election interference since that was the claim. It would be stupid to think they were asking if they simply had ANY connections since they were WIDELY known. Trump openly talked about his relationships with Russia citing them as a positive.
You think there is some HUGE gotcha in there somewhere but there isn't a crime even involved in talking to, dealing with, or even COLLUDING with anyone from ANY country.
Now it’s my turn to ask - give me names of who say collusion can’t get you into trouble? And if you say Rudy G., that’s as silly of an answer as my Andy and Barney.
 
PLEASE go back to doing what you CLAIM you were doing! You are the most ate up person alive!
When Trump answers questions, he answers what he thinks they are asking. He thought they were asking if there were connections regarding election interference since that was the claim. It would be stupid to think they were asking if they simply had ANY connections since they were WIDELY known. Trump openly talked about his relationships with Russia citing them as a positive.
You think there is some HUGE gotcha in there somewhere but there isn't a crime even involved in talking to, dealing with, or even COLLUDING with anyone from ANY country.
The only thing I've seen out of this is that Trump has been accused of violating campaign finance laws. That is a felony and IF proven he has a problem. I have no idea if they prove it but you just choose to ignore that claim against him.
 
Now it’s my turn to ask - give me names of who say collusion can’t get you into trouble? And if you say Rudy G., that’s as silly of an answer as my Andy and Barney.
I give.....who?
I said it wasn't a crime.
 
The only thing I've seen out of this is that Trump has been accused of violating campaign finance laws. That is a felony and IF proven he has a problem. I have no idea if they prove it but you just choose to ignore that claim against him.
Agreed. The thing is though, if paying people to sign a NDA is routine for Trump how can it be considered a campaign contribution? Trump paid for it out of his pocket and I think it is safe to assume this isn't the first time. How is it a felony to pay for a NDA?
 
Again I ask, other than Rudy ... ?
I don't know! I didn't know anyone was saying there wasn't "trouble" associated with collusion depending on what was colluded to do. I wouldn't think colluding to build a hotel would cause anyone concern while colluding to rig an election would. What colluding are you referring to?
 
You seem angry. FOURTEEN different associates had hook ups with russians.
If you think that is normal, then after all this time you are still in denial .

Lets see. I want to make 100 million off Trump Tower Moscow so I am going to set up my foreign policy to favor Putin. And I am going to praise him at every turn. Remember how puzzled everyone was when he kissed putins butt? Now we know why.
Thank you Mr Cohen.

My son in law is going to attempt to set up secret back channel communication so you comrades can help us with getting elected.
U help me win, I lift sanctions and then we
go for Ivanka Tower in Russia. My profit determines my policy, not what is best for my country. My followers are so stupid they will believe whatever I say. They will make excuses for everything I steal.
Why is it a concern that people who know Trump have dealt with Russians? How many people do you think Hillary knows with dealings with Russians? Bernie? Chuck and Nancy?

Do you have ANY proof of what you are accusing? Trump said repeatedly during the election how great a relationship he had with Russia and thought it was important for the US to also.
 
I don't know! I didn't know anyone was saying there wasn't "trouble" associated with collusion depending on what was colluded to do. I wouldn't think colluding to build a hotel would cause anyone concern while colluding to rig an election would. What colluding are you referring to?
You really need to pull your head out of the sand. Just keep telling yourself collusion is a-ok. Click you heels three times while you say it.
 
You really need to pull your head out of the sand. Just keep telling yourself collusion is a-ok. Click you heels three times while you say it.

You keep avoiding naming what collusion you are talking about......real or alleged.
Every football team colludes every play, is that wrong? Do you even know what collusion is?
 
Why is it a concern that people who know Trump have dealt with Russians? How many people do you think Hillary knows with dealings with Russians? Bernie? Chuck and Nancy?

Do you have ANY proof of what you are accusing? Trump said repeatedly during the election how great a relationship he had with Russia and thought it was important for the US to also.

Idiot. Hillary isn't president, neither is Bernie, nor Chuck, nor Nancy. BIG DIFFERENCE.
 
You keep avoiding naming what collusion you are talking about......real or alleged.
Every football team colludes every play, is that wrong? Do you even know what collusion is?
Conspiracy. When you dolts have to face reality with your godking it will be delicious
 
Agreed. The thing is though, if paying people to sign a NDA is routine for Trump how can it be considered a campaign contribution? Trump paid for it out of his pocket and I think it is safe to assume this isn't the first time. How is it a felony to pay for a NDA?
Maybe because it took place shortly before the election but the affair was a long time before that? Why didn't he pay her to keep quiet much sooner?I assume there prosecutors are not just taking Cohen's word for all this stuff. You can bet they have some kind of proof of what happened, be it emails or something else they ain't taking his word for it.
 
Maybe because it took place shortly before the election but the affair was a long time before that? Why didn't he pay her to keep quiet much sooner?I assume there prosecutors are not just taking Cohen's word for all this stuff. You can bet they have some kind of proof of what happened, be it emails or something else they ain't taking his word for it.
Is this hoping, trusting, believing, or what because it isn't knowing.
 
You keep avoiding naming what collusion you are talking about......real or alleged.
Every football team colludes every play, is that wrong? Do you even know what collusion is?
And you keep avoiding saying who, other than Rudy, says colluding with a foreign power to fix an election is not illegal. I’m not accusing anyone of anything with this statement. Just asking for name(s).
 
Basing USA foreign policy on personal business deals. Don’t you pay attention to current events?

Trust me. He does not keep up with current events. He never has. Then he fights you and wants you to explain what everyone else already knows from paying attention.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TJ_DUB
Basing USA foreign policy on personal business deals. Don’t you pay attention to current events?

You say Trump colluded with Russia to "basing USA foreign policy on personal business deals". Is that correct?
Other than not making sentence structure sense, what evidence do you have to support this? Is this a theory or do you have proof?
 
And you keep avoiding saying who, other than Rudy, says colluding with a foreign power to fix an election is not illegal. I’m not accusing anyone of anything with this statement. Just asking for name(s).
And I've answered several times.....who?
I'm not aware of Rudy or anyone saying colluding with Russia to "fix an election" is not illegal. What evidence is there that THIS happened?
I've acknowledged many times Trump "colluded" with Russia to do business deals BEFORE becoming President (as Trump bragged while running for President). THIS is not illegal or unethical. Collusion is not illegal unless you are colluding to do something illegal!
I'll answer this as many ways as possible.
I have no names.
Who.
I don't know.
I didn't know anyone has.

Am I missing the question you claim i'm avoiding? Why do you insist i'm not answering when i've answered EVERY time you repeatedly ask it?
 
Miller, turn off FOX and watch other news/current events. All the questions you’re asking are being answered on a daily basis by 100’s of news outlets. You really do sound silly with questions that have been being answered for weeks, if not months.
 
Miller, turn off FOX and watch other news/current events. All the questions you’re asking are being answered on a daily basis by 100’s of news outlets. You really do sound silly with questions that have been being answered for weeks, if not months.
As I knew, you refuse to answer questions by claiming I refuse to falsely.......exposed.
Just like Chuck and Nancy claim to want transparency while insisting the cameras be shut off.
 
As I knew, you refuse to answer questions by claiming I refuse to falsely.......exposed.
Just like Chuck and Nancy claim to want transparency while insisting the cameras be shut off.
What question did you ask that hasn’t been being answered on a daily basis?
 
What question did you ask that hasn’t been being answered on a daily basis?

None of them have been answered that i'm aware of except the unexplained "Russia" answer.
It should be quite simple to answer my questions since you think the answers are obvious but you dodge them claiming superiority shouting "Fox" as the rebuttal indicating you know nothing.
 
Defraud the people of the USA. Once again, keep up with current events.
Defraud them of what?
Anyone can make claims (even you). Supporting your claim with proof is much more challenging (especially for you......see, I can make insulting accusations too. Though the proof is everywhere on here).
 
Defraud them of what?
Anyone can make claims (even you). Supporting your claim with proof is much more challenging (especially for you......see, I can make insulting accusations too. Though the proof is everywhere on here).
I’m tired of going over this. Let’s let things play out and then we’ll know who was right and who was blinded by politics.
 
Is this hoping, trusting, believing, or what because it isn't knowing.
I don't know what Trump has or hasn't done but his lawyer is going to prison for illegal campaign contributions that he says he was told to do by Trump. You say it was not illegal but the prosecutors and a federal judge say otherwise and the money used to pay back Cohen for the deal with Stromy came from the Trump coporation. The Southern District of NY prosecutors, NOT Mueller, say Trump was knowingly involved and presented this to the judge. Judge Napolitano, a regular on Fox News, and not a liberal by any stretch, said today that Trump has committed a felony. He said by law the prosecutors cannot present such evidence to the judge unless they have evidence and intend to do something with it. If you think these folks are depending solely on the testimony of Cohen you just ain't been payin attention.
Oh btw, Trumps financial guru, Wieselberg who has been with the organization since daddy Trump was running it has immunity, not a plea deal, along with the head guy at the National Inquirer that bought the rights to McDougal's story about her affair with Trump and never published it has said he did it to help the Trump campaign, not the Trump corporation, the campaign! Wieselberg said the only other people that can sign checks for the Trump organization are Trump's adult children, so far they have not received immunity as far as I know.
I'm trying to figure out why the standard for impeachment says "high crimes and misdemeanors." Isn't a misdemeanor by definition something that is NOT a serious crime? Why is that even considered in an impeachment proceeding? I have no idea why dems in the new house would entertain the idea of impeachment knowing they couldn't get a conviction in the senate with what we know at this time. Let this play out then see what it looks like.
 
I don't know what Trump has or hasn't done but his lawyer is going to prison for illegal campaign contributions that he says he was told to do by Trump. You say it was not illegal but the prosecutors and a federal judge say otherwise and the money used to pay back Cohen for the deal with Stromy came from the Trump coporation.

He's going to prison for the other charges.
They could be illegal if the circumstances were right but, do you think TV personalities regularly buy silence? Big business types? Unless they can show this only happened for political reasons and was paid for by someone else with that intent, it's not a campaign finance issue.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT