ADVERTISEMENT

Trump's financial records

kaskaskiakid

Well-Known Member
Nov 14, 2019
3,590
2,085
113
What's he hiding?? Remember in '16 debates when he promised to release his records when the IRS audit was completed?

The American public has the right to know if the president has economic interests in other countries and if those countries are getting special treatment in trump's foreign policy.
 
In all honesty, I think many are making a mountain out of a mole hill about this. I think what Trump is hiding is that everything he owns is leveraged badly and his "perceived" wealth is more of a house of cards. To Trump it is all about image and he wants people to think that he is one of the richest men ever, to release if financial records would probable prove otherwise.
 
In all honesty, I think many are making a mountain out of a mole hill about this. I think what Trump is hiding is that everything he owns is leveraged badly and his "perceived" wealth is more of a house of cards. To Trump it is all about image and he wants people to think that he is one of the richest men ever, to release if financial records would probable prove otherwise.

Absolutely agree, but I also suspect he has some shady deals in foreign countries with some shady characters.

DBTCA loaned Donald Trump a significant portion of the $2.5 billion total lent to him by Deutsche Bank. The breach report provided by Broeksmit is a inside look into DBTCA’s complete financials around the time DBTCA issued several of its largest loans to Trump. In 2012, DBTCA approved a $125 million loan to purchase the Trump Doral Resort in Florida. Also in 2012, Trump took out an additional loan on his Chicago property, and in 2015, yet another DBTCA loan, this one worth $170 million, allowed Trump to purchase a 60-year lease to the Old Post Office Building in Washington, D.C.

The subsidiary also had a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, the pedophile and sex trafficker who died under suspicious circumstances after his arrest in July, 2019. That relationship began in 2013, the same year Broeksmit was presented with the DBTCA breach report which documented massive liabilities to Russia.
 
In all honesty, I think many are making a mountain out of a mole hill about this. I think what Trump is hiding is that everything he owns is leveraged badly and his "perceived" wealth is more of a house of cards. To Trump it is all about image and he wants people to think that he is one of the richest men ever, to release if financial records would probable prove otherwise.
I will looking forward to your response on here when you find out different and you say, "well I'll be darn".
 
Bullit lives in denial.

No I just don't think the man is as rich as his ego thinks he is.... you might believe him when he talks about how much he is worth but I don't.
Yeah sure maybe he owes some money to somebody, but I have not seen anything he has done that says he is owned by the Russians. Was it not Obama's administration that allowed Russia to assume an interest in a Uranium mine and not saying that is wrong just saying what has Trumps administration done that comes close to that for the Russians? Yeah I would maybe have reason to be concerned if I had seen him or his administration doing something that put the United states interest into question...but so far I haven't seen that smoking gun any more so than when Obama was in office.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Chris Gardner
Absolutely agree, but I also suspect he has some shady deals in foreign countries with some shady characters.

DBTCA loaned Donald Trump a significant portion of the $2.5 billion total lent to him by Deutsche Bank. The breach report provided by Broeksmit is a inside look into DBTCA’s complete financials around the time DBTCA issued several of its largest loans to Trump. In 2012, DBTCA approved a $125 million loan to purchase the Trump Doral Resort in Florida. Also in 2012, Trump took out an additional loan on his Chicago property, and in 2015, yet another DBTCA loan, this one worth $170 million, allowed Trump to purchase a 60-year lease to the Old Post Office Building in Washington, D.C.

The subsidiary also had a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, the pedophile and sex trafficker who died under suspicious circumstances after his arrest in July, 2019. That relationship began in 2013, the same year Broeksmit was presented with the DBTCA breach report which documented massive liabilities to Russia.

I think the man is very shady and there are many that say that is how he got things done even going so far as to pay off the Mob to help him get things built. But yet he has not done anything with Russia so far that says to me he is compromised? Now that might not always be the case but so far I just don't see it.
 
“he has not done anything with Russia so far that says to me he is compromised?” Denial ain’t a river. Good freakin grief. Omg.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Veer2Eternity
Every president since Nixon have released their financial records even though there isn't a law requiring the president to do so. In Nixon's case, after parts of his financial records were secretly released, Nixon released his full records in the interest of transparency. Every president since has followed suit. Why could trump possibly be refusing to release his if everything is copacetic?

I don't care how much money he has or even how much he may owe. I think we have a right to know how much he is paying in taxes. But more importantly, in the interest of transparency, I find it important to know where and with whom any POTUS has done business with or still doing business with in his absence, especially with foreign countries. There can't be the slightest hint of conflict of interest and appearance of personal gains on decisions the POTUS makes with domestic or foreign policy. There is no way of knowing who he is doing business with overseas and if those people have interests not in America's best interests or if those people are involved in anything illegal or corrupt. We have the right to expect our president be making all decisions without the slightest possibility that his decision is influenced by personal gain, and that he is not involved with any foreign company with illegal ties. If nothing to hide, then why not disclose in the interest of transparency.
 
Every president since Nixon have released their financial records even though there isn't a law requiring the president to do so. In Nixon's case, after parts of his financial records were secretly released, Nixon released his full records in the interest of transparency. Every president since has followed suit. Why could trump possibly be refusing to release his if everything is copacetic?

I don't care how much money he has or even how much he may owe. I think we have a right to know how much he is paying in taxes. But more importantly, in the interest of transparency, I find it important to know where and with whom any POTUS has done business with or still doing business with in his absence, especially with foreign countries. There can't be the slightest hint of conflict of interest and appearance of personal gains on decisions the POTUS makes with domestic or foreign policy. There is no way of knowing who he is doing business with overseas and if those people have interests not in America's best interests or if those people are involved in anything illegal or corrupt. We have the right to expect our president be making all decisions without the slightest possibility that his decision is influenced by personal gain, and that he is not involved with any foreign company with illegal ties. If nothing to hide, then why not disclose in the interest of transparency.

To be honest I don't disagree with you I think it is nice to know. However it is not the law no matter who screams and cries about it.
The Legislation body could probable change that, hell I think everybody in government probable needs to let their tax returns be open, it would make everything more transparent. But right now that is not the law...it is not a right at this moment in time for anybody to know, however I don't disagree it probable needs to be changed
 
The leader of our country's financial records should be transparent and beyond reproach to eliminate any kind of conflict of interest or personal financial gain from decisions he makes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HomeyR
The leader of our country's financial records should be transparent and beyond reproach to eliminate any kind of conflict of interest or personal financial gain from decisions he makes.
So where do you draw the line then? Because the President is one thing. He may be squeaky clean. But doesn’t mean his son is. Or his brother. Or his wife. Or his cousin. Or nephew.

I think you get the hint.
 
The leader of our country's financial records should be transparent and beyond reproach to eliminate any kind of conflict of interest or personal financial gain from decisions he makes.
Normally, in a normal situation yes. But these are not normal times. But not for the creeps with a D.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hoopsrus6
Don't you think that a president who is not owned by the Russians would have made some sort of statement about the bounty on our troops?
 
To be honest I don't disagree with you I think it is nice to know. However it is not the law no matter who screams and cries about it.
The Legislation body could probable change that, hell I think everybody in government probable needs to let their tax returns be open, it would make everything more transparent. But right now that is not the law...it is not a right at this moment in time for anybody to know, however I don't disagree it probable needs to be changed
'Probably'. We had this discussion a long time ago, I thought by now you would have changed the way you spell it. I'm done, now carry on. :p
 
Don't you think that a president who is not owned by the Russians would have believed our intelligence over Putin?
 
Can you show where our intelligence believes the bounty story is reliable? I've not seen anything official to say it is accurate. Why would you want to start something over a rumor?

Because that is our intelligence agencies job. Would you rather they not investigate any rumor that harms America?
 
Because that is our intelligence agencies job. Would you rather they not investigate any rumor that harms America?

If there is a chance that it is true, do you use your influence to allow Putin to rejoin the G-8 summit?
Or do you look for an opportunity to apply sanctions? Everything he does goes back to Putin.
He bent the knee at Helsinki and humiliated himself. Weak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kaskaskiakid
Trump is still trying to pave the way for his Moscow Trump Towers project, the largest building in Europe at 100 stories, with his Russian mobster business associates. Every decision he makes is about how it benefits him.
 
That doesn't show where our intelligence thought it was reliable! That just says according to an ANONYMOUS leaker it is possible it happened. It also says every official who isn't anonymous says it was not deemed trustworthy and Trump wasn't involved.

Still I think it is our intelligence community's job to investigate any rumor involving a foreign entity that may be involved in espionage or subversive activity against the US.

Just like the Russian investigation, it is imperative for the US intelligence to investigate all rumors of foreign countries conspiring against the US.
 
Trump is still trying to pave the way for his Moscow Trump Towers project, the largest building in Europe at 100 stories, with his Russian mobster business associates. Every decision he makes is about how it benefits him.
What evidence do you have of this other than suspicion or gut beliefs?
 
Sure, but that doesn't mean retaliation is warranted. It is at this point unsubstantiated. There is no action Trump should take and at this point doesn't even rise to the level of his attention.

However, Trump's lack of response goes against the persona he likes to portray as the tough guy American president. This is the same guy that threatened to blow North Korea and Afghanistan back to the Stone Age. Why suddenly so quiet when it involves Russia?? Hint - follow the money!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: HomeyR
That doesn't show where our intelligence thought it was reliable! That just says according to an ANONYMOUS leaker it is possible it happened. It also says every official who isn't anonymous says it was not deemed trustworthy and Trump wasn't involved.
What the heck are you reading?
 
  • Like
Reactions: HomeyR
The incessant whining is ridiculous. Conservatives are so mistreated on here.
Receiving criticism is different from cancel culture. Cancel culture smears your reputation, goes after your livelihood, and gets you fired. This is happening all over the United States and has been happening for a long time. There are many many examples. But you are right, no whining should be allowed by anyone at any time. I agree.
 
Receiving criticism is different from cancel culture. Cancel culture smears your reputation, goes after your livelihood, and gets you fired. This is happening all over the United States and has been happening for a long time. There are many many examples. But you are right, no whining should be allowed by anyone at any time. I agree.
Nfl
Nba
Nascar

Cancel culture?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT